| Literature DB >> 19543499 |
Hyo-Bin Kim1, Hyun-Seung Jin, So-Yeon Lee, Ja-Hyeong Kim, Bong-Seong Kim, Seong Jong Park, Soo-Jong Hong.
Abstract
Although the mechanisms are unclear, rush immunotherapy (RIT) may be effective to treat allergic diseases. We investigated the long-term modifications of cellular immunity as a mechanism of RIT. The RIT group, included 15 house dust mite (HDM)-sensitized asthmatic children, received RIT only with Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f) and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Der p), whereas the control group, consisted of 10 HDM-sensitized asthmatic children, did not receive RIT. The asthma symptom scores and the skin reactivities to Der f were measured. The cellular proliferative responses and intracellular interleukin (IL)-5 and interferon (IFN)-gamma productions from peripheral blood T cells were also measured before, 8 weeks and 1 yr after RIT. The symptom scores, skin reactivity to Der f and cellular proliferative responses to Der f were decreased significantly after 8 weeks and maintained until 1 yr of RIT. The IFN-gamma/IL-5 ratio of the CD3+ and CD4+ cells were increased significantly after 8 weeks and maintained until 1 yr of RIT, while there were no changes in the control group. These data indicate that the continuous functional modification from Th2 to Th1 phenotype of the CD4+ T cells are developed after RIT in the asthmatic children sensitized with HDM.Entities:
Keywords: Asthma; House Dust Mite; Interferon-γ; Rush Immunotherapy; T Cell
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19543499 PMCID: PMC2698182 DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.3.392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Korean Med Sci ISSN: 1011-8934 Impact factor: 2.153
Characteristics of patients before rush immunotherapy
All values are median (range).
P>0.05 between the patients with and without RIT.
RIT, rush immunotherapy; A/H ratio, Allergen/histamine ratio; mon, month.
Fig. 1Respiratory symptom scores (A) and skin test reactivity to Der f (B) were decreased significantly at 8 weeks after RIT and maintained until 1 yr after RIT in the RIT group, but not in control group.
Fig. 2The cellular proliferative responses (stimulation index, SI) were decreased significantly at 8 weeks after RIT (•) and maintained until 1 yr after RIT (□) compared to those before RIT (○) (A), whereas they were not suppressed in the control group (B).
Fig. 3The CD4(+) T cells were increased at 8 weeks after RIT, but these cells were decreased at 1 yr after RIT compared to the cell population at 8 weeks after RIT (A). There were no significant changes during 3 follow-up periods in the control group (B).
Fig. 4IFN-γ/IL-5 ratio from the peripheral CD4(+) T cells was increased at 8 weeks after RIT compared to before RIT and it was maintained at 1 yr after RIT (A). It was not changed in each follow-up period in the control group (B).