| Literature DB >> 35174055 |
Tipyapa Rattanamanee1, Putthapoom Lumjiaktase2, Nanthisa Kemawichanura2, Potjanee Kiewnga1, Wanlapa Jotikasthira1, Wiparat Manuyakorn1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: House dust mites (HDM) are the major causative allergen for allergic rhinitis. The sole disease-modifying therapy for allergic rhinitis is allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Rush immunotherapy is the accelerated build-up schedules to reach the target maintenance dose.Entities:
Keywords: Cytokines; Dust mite; Regulatory T cells; Rhinitis; Subcutaneous immunotherapy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35174055 PMCID: PMC8819415 DOI: 10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asia Pac Allergy ISSN: 2233-8276
Protocol for modified rush house dust mite allergen immunotherapy
| Rush (1-hour interval between injections) | Build-up | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 | Day 2 | ||||
| Concentration | Volume (mL) | Concentration | Volume (mL) | Concentration | Volume (mL) |
| 1:1000 vol/vol | 0.1 | 1:10 vol/vol | 0.1 | 1:10 vol/vol | 0.25 |
| 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.30 | |||
| 0.4 | 0.35 | ||||
| 0.40 | |||||
| 0.45 | |||||
| 0.50 | |||||
| 1:100 vol/vol | 0.1 | 1:1 vol/vol | 0.10 | ||
| 0.3 | 0.15 | ||||
| 0.5 | 0.20 | ||||
| 0.25 | |||||
| 0.30 | |||||
| 0.35 | |||||
| 0.40 | |||||
| 0.45 | |||||
| 0.50 | |||||
Fig. 1The gating strategy of the percentage of CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T (Treg) cells population Isotype (A), and test (B) were gated to allow determination of population densities. Data from the children patients (n = 12; with house dust mites subcutaneous immunotherapy) were acquired using The BD FACSCalibur. CD4+ population gated by SSC and CD4 FITC, then Treg gated from CD4+ by CD25+ Foxp3+ population. Histograms of CD25+ and Foxp3+ showed purity of CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ (Treg) cells population gating.
Characteristic of patients who had systemic reactions during rush allergen immunotherapy
| Age (yr) | Sex | Dose with reaction | Symptoms | Systemic reaction grading* | Treatments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Female | 1:10 v/v 0.2 mL | Acute urticaria | Grade 3 | IV antihistamine |
| Wheezing | Epinephrine IM | ||||
| Decreased PEFR | |||||
| 8 | Male | 1:10 v/v 0.2 mL | Acute urticaria | Grade 3 | IV antihistamine |
| Wheezing | Epinephrine IM | ||||
| Decreased PEFR | |||||
| 13 | Female | 1:10 v/v 0.1 mL | Flushing | Grade 2 | IV antihistamine |
| Decreased PEFR | Salbutamol nebulization | ||||
| 13 | Male | 1:10 v/v 0.1 mL | Acute urticaria | Grade 1 | Oral antihistamine |
| 7 | Female | 1:10 v/v 0.2 mL | Acute urticaria | Grade 1 | Oral antihistamine |
| 10 | Male | 1:10 v/v 0.1 mL | Acute urticaria | Grade 1 | Oral antihistamine |
| 5 | Male | 1:10 v/v 0.2 mL | Acute urticaria | Grade 1 | Oral antihistamine |
PEFR, peak expiratory flow rate; IM, intramuscular injection; IV, intraveouns injection.
*The World Allergy Organization Subcutaneous Immunotherapy Systemic Reaction Grading System.
Fig. 2Comparison of rhinitis symptom-free day changes after house dust mites (HDM) allergen immunotherapy (A) and serum specific IgE to HDM at baseline and 12 months after maintenance (MN) dose (MN 12 Mo) (B). MN 6 Mo, 6 months after MN dose.
Fig. 3Dynamic changes of the percentage of CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ (Treg) in CD4+ cells (A) at baseline, at maintenance (MN) dose, 6 months after MN dose (MN 6 Mo), and 12 months after MN dose (MN 12 Mo), serum IFN-γ (B), IL-4 (C), serum IL-13 (D), ratio of IFN-γ and IL-4 (E), and serum IL-10 (F).