BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy results in a number of changes in clinical, inflammatory, and immunologic parameters. However, the basis for the specificity of this form of therapy is unknown, especially in the context of changes in T- and B-lymphocyte function after desensitization to specific allergens. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the immunologic consequences of rush immunotherapy. METHODS: We studied 10 patients who had positive skin test responses to the house dust mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dpt) and cat dander extract. Each received rush immunotherapy to mite, but not cat dander, over a 2- to 4-week period until maintenance was achieved. Patients were evaluated before and when maintenance was achieved for skin test and nasal reactivity to mite and cat dander; antibody levels to the allergen were monitored, as were lymphocyte proliferative responses and cytokine production. RESULTS: Rush immunotherapy to house dust mite resulted in a significant reduction in skin and nasal reactivity to mite allergen, but not to cat allergen, in 10 of 10 patients. This was accompanied by a rise in serum anti-Dpt IgE, whereas anti-cat IgE was not altered (7 of 7 patients). In seven of seven patients there was an increase in anti-Dpt IgG4 levels. T-cell proliferative responses to mite antigen were suppressed, and numbers of CD8+ T cells increased in frequency. There was a marked increase in interferon-gamma production, particularly by CD4+ T cells in 10 of 10 patients. The correlation between the increases in interferon-gamma production and the changes in cutaneous reactivity was highly significant. CONCLUSION: We show that rush immunotherapy is immunologically specific in eliciting changes in T- and B-cell responses to the desensitization antigen. The specificity and potential benefit of immunotherapy may be linked to the increase in interferon-gamma production by allergen-activated CD4+ T lymphocytes.
BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy results in a number of changes in clinical, inflammatory, and immunologic parameters. However, the basis for the specificity of this form of therapy is unknown, especially in the context of changes in T- and B-lymphocyte function after desensitization to specific allergens. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine the immunologic consequences of rush immunotherapy. METHODS: We studied 10 patients who had positive skin test responses to the house dust mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (Dpt) and cat dander extract. Each received rush immunotherapy to mite, but not cat dander, over a 2- to 4-week period until maintenance was achieved. Patients were evaluated before and when maintenance was achieved for skin test and nasal reactivity to mite and cat dander; antibody levels to the allergen were monitored, as were lymphocyte proliferative responses and cytokine production. RESULTS: Rush immunotherapy to house dust mite resulted in a significant reduction in skin and nasal reactivity to mite allergen, but not to cat allergen, in 10 of 10 patients. This was accompanied by a rise in serum anti-Dpt IgE, whereas anti-cat IgE was not altered (7 of 7 patients). In seven of seven patients there was an increase in anti-Dpt IgG4 levels. T-cell proliferative responses to mite antigen were suppressed, and numbers of CD8+ T cells increased in frequency. There was a marked increase in interferon-gamma production, particularly by CD4+ T cells in 10 of 10 patients. The correlation between the increases in interferon-gamma production and the changes in cutaneous reactivity was highly significant. CONCLUSION: We show that rush immunotherapy is immunologically specific in eliciting changes in T- and B-cell responses to the desensitization antigen. The specificity and potential benefit of immunotherapy may be linked to the increase in interferon-gamma production by allergen-activated CD4+ T lymphocytes.
Authors: Jenna L Van Gramberg; Michael J de Veer; Robyn E O'Hehir; Els N T Meeusen; Robert J Bischof Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Suzanne C Morris; Charles Perkins; Crystal Potter; David Parsons; Richard Schuman; Marat V Khodoun; Unni Samavedam; Richard Strait; Fred D Finkelman Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 14.290