Literature DB >> 19542601

Effects of multi-directional vibrotactile feedback on vestibular-deficient postural performance during continuous multi-directional support surface perturbations.

K H Sienko1, M D Balkwill, L I E Oddsson, C Wall.   

Abstract

Single-axis vibrotactile feedback of trunk tilt provided in real-time has previously been shown to significantly reduce the root-mean-square (RMS) trunk sway in subjects with vestibular loss during single-axis perturbation. This research examines the effect of multi-directional vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during continuous multi-directional surface perturbations when the subjects' eyes are closed. Eight subjects with vestibular loss donned a multi-axis feedback device that mapped body tilt estimates onto their torsos with a 3-row by 16-column array of tactile actuators (tactors). Tactor row indicated tilt magnitude and tactor column indicated tilt direction. Root-mean-square trunk tilt, elliptical fits to trunk sway trajectory areas, percentage of time spent outside a no vibrotactile feedback zone, RMS center of pressure, and anchoring index parameters indicating intersegmental coordination were used to assess the efficacy of the multi-directional vibrotactile balance aid. Four tactor display configurations in addition to the tactors off configuration were evaluated. Subjects had significantly reduced RMS trunk sway, significantly smaller elliptical fits of the trajectory area, and spent significantly less time outside of the no feedback zone in the tactors on versus the tactors off configuration. Among the displays evaluated in this study, there was not an optimal tactor column configuration for standing tasks involving continuous surface perturbations. Furthermore, subjects performed worse when erroneous information was displayed. Therefore, a spatial resolution of 90 degrees (4 columns) seems to be as effective as a spatial resolution of 22.5 degrees (16 columns) for control of standing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19542601

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vestib Res        ISSN: 0957-4271            Impact factor:   2.435


  31 in total

1.  Effects of biofeedback on secondary-task response time and postural stability in older adults.

Authors:  Stephanie Haggerty; Liang-Ting Jiang; Andrzej Galecki; Kathleen H Sienko
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Automatically Evaluating Balance: A Machine Learning Approach.

Authors:  Tian Bao; Brooke N Klatt; Susan L Whitney; Kathleen H Sienko; Jenna Wiens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  The effect of age on postural and cognitive task performance while using vibrotactile feedback.

Authors:  Chia-Cheng Lin; Susan L Whitney; Patrick J Loughlin; Joseph M Furman; Mark S Redfern; Kathleen H Sienko; Patrick J Sparto
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Directional postural responses induced by vibrotactile stimulations applied to the torso.

Authors:  Beom-Chan Lee; Bernard J Martin; Kathleen H Sienko
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Augmenting sensorimotor control using "goal-aware" vibrotactile stimulation during reaching and manipulation behaviors.

Authors:  Emmanouil Tzorakoleftherakis; Todd D Murphey; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The Use of Vibrotactile Feedback During Dual-Task Standing Balance Conditions in People With Unilateral Vestibular Hypofunction.

Authors:  Chia-Cheng Lin; Susan L Whitney; Patrick J Loughlin; Joseph M Furman; Mark S Redfern; Kathleen H Sienko; Patrick J Sparto
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Effects of vibrotactile feedback on human learning of arm motions.

Authors:  Karlin Bark; Emily Hyman; Frank Tan; Elizabeth Cha; Steven A Jax; Laurel J Buxbaum; Katherine J Kuchenbecker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 8.  Motor control and aging: links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects.

Authors:  Rachael D Seidler; Jessica A Bernard; Taritonye B Burutolu; Brett W Fling; Mark T Gordon; Joseph T Gwin; Youngbin Kwak; David B Lipps
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Automatically evaluating balance using machine learning and data from a single inertial measurement unit.

Authors:  Fahad Kamran; Kathryn Harrold; Jonathan Zwier; Wendy Carender; Tian Bao; Kathleen H Sienko; Jenna Wiens
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Biofeedback improves postural control recovery from multi-axis discrete perturbations.

Authors:  Kathleen H Sienko; M David Balkwill; Conrad Wall
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.