Literature DB >> 27074942

Augmenting sensorimotor control using "goal-aware" vibrotactile stimulation during reaching and manipulation behaviors.

Emmanouil Tzorakoleftherakis1, Todd D Murphey2,3, Robert A Scheidt4,5,6.   

Abstract

We describe two sets of experiments that examine the ability of vibrotactile encoding of simple position error and combined object states (calculated from an optimal controller) to enhance performance of reaching and manipulation tasks in healthy human adults. The goal of the first experiment (tracking) was to follow a moving target with a cursor on a computer screen. Visual and/or vibrotactile cues were provided in this experiment, and vibrotactile feedback was redundant with visual feedback in that it did not encode any information above and beyond what was already available via vision. After only 10 minutes of practice using vibrotactile feedback to guide performance, subjects tracked the moving target with response latency and movement accuracy values approaching those observed under visually guided reaching. Unlike previous reports on multisensory enhancement, combining vibrotactile and visual feedback of performance errors conferred neither positive nor negative effects on task performance. In the second experiment (balancing), vibrotactile feedback encoded a corrective motor command as a linear combination of object states (derived from a linear-quadratic regulator implementing a trade-off between kinematic and energetic performance) to teach subjects how to balance a simulated inverted pendulum. Here, the tactile feedback signal differed from visual feedback in that it provided information that was not readily available from visual feedback alone. Immediately after applying this novel "goal-aware" vibrotactile feedback, time to failure was improved by a factor of three. Additionally, the effect of vibrotactile training persisted after the feedback was removed. These results suggest that vibrotactile encoding of appropriate combinations of state information may be an effective form of augmented sensory feedback that can be applied, among other purposes, to compensate for lost or compromised proprioception as commonly observed, for example, in stroke survivors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choice reaction time; Multisensory enhancement; Optimal control; Redundancy; Sensory substitution

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27074942     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4645-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  35 in total

1.  Good vibrations: tactile feedback in support of attention allocation and human-automation coordination in event-driven domains.

Authors:  A E Sklar; N B Sarter
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.888

2.  The cerebellum and the timing of coordinated eye and hand tracking.

Authors:  R C Miall; G Z Reckess
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  The cerebellum coordinates eye and hand tracking movements.

Authors:  R C Miall; G Z Reckess; H Imamizu
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Multisensory gain within and across hemispaces in simple and choice reaction time paradigms.

Authors:  Simon Girard; Olivier Collignon; Franco Lepore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Influences of hand movements on eye movements in tracking tasks in man.

Authors:  P W Koken; C J Erkelens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Multisensory enhancement: gains in choice and in simple response times.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner; Avi Karni
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement?

Authors:  R S Nickerson
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Optimal integration of visual and proprioceptive movement information for the perception of trajectory geometry.

Authors:  Johanna Reuschel; Knut Drewing; Denise Y P Henriques; Frank Rösler; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex.

Authors:  J P Rauschecker
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 10.  Brain-machine interfaces: computational demands and clinical needs meet basic neuroscience.

Authors:  Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Lee E Miller
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.837

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effect of Dual Tasking on Vibrotactile Feedback Guided Reaching - a Pilot Study.

Authors:  Valay A Shah; Nicoletta Risi; Giulia Ballardini; Leigh A Mrotek; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Haptics (2018)       Date:  2018-06-05

2.  Supplemental vibrotactile feedback control of stabilization and reaching actions of the arm using limb state and position error encodings.

Authors:  Alexis R Krueger; Psiche Giannoni; Valay Shah; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 3.  Elucidating Sensorimotor Control Principles with Myoelectric Musculoskeletal Models.

Authors:  Sarah E Goodman; Christopher J Hasson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Spatial and temporal influences on discrimination of vibrotactile stimuli on the arm.

Authors:  Valay A Shah; Maura Casadio; Robert A Scheidt; Leigh A Mrotek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Vibrotactile Perception for Sensorimotor Augmentation: Perceptual Discrimination of Vibrotactile Stimuli Induced by Low-Cost Eccentric Rotating Mass Motors at Different Body Locations in Young, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults.

Authors:  Ella Pomplun; Ashiya Thomas; Erin Corrigan; Valay A Shah; Leigh A Mrotek; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-07-01

6.  The effect of tactile augmentation on manipulation and grip force control during force-field adaptation.

Authors:  Chen Avraham; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.262

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.