OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effectiveness of a 5-year trial of a comprehensive school-based program designed to prevent substance use, violent behaviors, and sexual activity among elementary-school students. METHODS: We used a matched-pair, cluster-randomized, controlled design, with 10 intervention schools and 10 control schools. Fifth-graders (N = 1714) self-reported on lifetime substance use, violence, and voluntary sexual activity. Teachers of participant students reported on student (N = 1225) substance use and violence. RESULTS: Two-level random-effects count models (with students nested within schools) indicated that student-reported substance use (rate ratio [RR] = 0.41; 90% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25, 0.66) and violence (RR = 0.42; 90% CI = 0.24, 0.73) were significantly lower for students attending intervention schools. A 2-level random-effects binary model indicated that sexual activity was lower (odds ratio = 0.24; 90% CI = 0.08, 0.66) for intervention students. Teacher reports substantiated the effects seen for student-reported data. Dose-response analyses indicated that students exposed to the program for at least 3 years had significantly lower rates of all negative behaviors. CONCLUSIONS:Risk-related behaviors were substantially reduced for students who participated in the program, providing evidence that a comprehensive school-based program can have a strong beneficial effect on student behavior.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effectiveness of a 5-year trial of a comprehensive school-based program designed to prevent substance use, violent behaviors, and sexual activity among elementary-school students. METHODS: We used a matched-pair, cluster-randomized, controlled design, with 10 intervention schools and 10 control schools. Fifth-graders (N = 1714) self-reported on lifetime substance use, violence, and voluntary sexual activity. Teachers of participant students reported on student (N = 1225) substance use and violence. RESULTS: Two-level random-effects count models (with students nested within schools) indicated that student-reported substance use (rate ratio [RR] = 0.41; 90% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25, 0.66) and violence (RR = 0.42; 90% CI = 0.24, 0.73) were significantly lower for students attending intervention schools. A 2-level random-effects binary model indicated that sexual activity was lower (odds ratio = 0.24; 90% CI = 0.08, 0.66) for intervention students. Teacher reports substantiated the effects seen for student-reported data. Dose-response analyses indicated that students exposed to the program for at least 3 years had significantly lower rates of all negative behaviors. CONCLUSIONS: Risk-related behaviors were substantially reduced for students who participated in the program, providing evidence that a comprehensive school-based program can have a strong beneficial effect on student behavior.
Authors: Richard F Catalano; J David Hawkins; M Lisa Berglund; John A Pollard; Michael W Arthur Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Alicia C Merline; Patrick M O'Malley; John E Schulenberg; Jerald G Bachman; Lloyd D Johnston Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: W Alex Mason; Rick Kosterman; J David Hawkins; Todd I Herrenkohl; Liliana J Lengua; Elizabeth McCauley Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Isaac J Washburn; Alan Acock; Sam Vuchinich; Frank Snyder; Kin-Kit Li; Peter Ji; Joseph Day; David DuBois; Brian R Flay Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2011-09
Authors: Enrique Chaux; Madeleine Barrera; Andrés Molano; Ana María Velásquez; Melisa Castellanos; Maria Paula Chaparro; Andrea Bustamante Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2017-10
Authors: Tim A Bruckner; Thurston Domina; Jin Kyoung Hwang; Julie Gerlinger; Christopher Carpenter; Sara Wakefield Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2013-09-07 Impact factor: 5.012