Literature DB >> 19540722

Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias clarify measurement and conceptual perspectives on response shift.

Frans J Oort1, Mechteld R M Visser, Mirjam A G Sprangers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Response shift is generally associated with a change in the meaning of test scores, impeding the comparison of repeated measurements. Still, different researchers have different views of response shift. From a measurement perspective, response shift can be considered as bias in the measurement of change, whereas from a more conceptual perspective, it can be considered as bias in the explanation of change. We propose definitions to accommodate both interpretations of response shift. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Formal definitions of measurement bias and explanation bias serve to define response shift in measurement and conceptual perspectives. Examples from the field of health-related quality of life research illustrate the definitions.
RESULTS: Definitions of response shifts as special cases of either measurement bias or explanation bias clarify different interpretations of response shift and lead to different research methods. Different structural equation models are suggested to investigate biases and response shifts in each of the two perspectives.
CONCLUSION: It is important to distinguish between measurement and conceptual perspectives as they involve different ideas about response shift. Definitions from both perspectives help to resolve conceptual and methodological confusion around response shift and to further its research.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19540722     DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  29 in total

1.  Philosophical perspectives on response shift.

Authors:  Leah McClimans; Jerome Bickenbach; Marjan Westerman; Licia Carlson; David Wasserman; Carolyn Schwartz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Pitfalls in subgroup analysis based on growth mixture models: a commentary on Van Leeuwen et al. (2012).

Authors:  Cameron N McIntosh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-10       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Guidelines for secondary analysis in search of response shift.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Sara Ahmed; Richard Sawatzky; Tolulope Sajobi; Nancy Mayo; Joel Finkelstein; Lisa Lix; Mathilde G E Verdam; Frans J Oort; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  The impact of second-line agents on patients' health-related quality of life in the treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arijit Ganguli; Phillip Wiegand; Xin Gao; John A Carter; Marc F Botteman; Saurabh Ray
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  In prospective study using Specific Quality of Life & Outcomes Response-Venous (SQOR-V) questionnaire the recall bias had the same magnitude as the minimally important difference.

Authors:  Fedor Lurie; Robert L Kistner
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Introduction to special section on response shift at the item level.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  An Analysis of Response Shifts in Teacher Reports Associated with the Use of a Universal School-Based Intervention to Reduce Externalising Behaviour.

Authors:  Aja Louise Murray; Tom Booth; Manuel Eisner; Denis Ribeaud; Karen McKenzie; George Murray
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2019-11

8.  Influence of explanatory and confounding variables on HRQoL after controlling for measurement bias and response shift in measurement.

Authors:  Pranav K Gandhi; L Douglas Ried; Carole L Kimberlin; Teresa L Kauf; I-Chan Huang
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Quality of life in women following various surgeries of body manipulation: organ transplantation, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction.

Authors:  M Angeles Pérez-San-Gregorio; Eduardo Fernández-Jiménez; Agustín Martín-Rodríguez; Mercedes Borda-Más; M Esther Rincón-Fernández
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2013-09

10.  Do not throw out the baby with the bath water: build on current approaches to realize conceptual clarity. Response to Ubel, Peeters, and Smith.

Authors:  Mirjam A G Sprangers; Carolyn E Schwartz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.