William F Anderson1, Ruth M Pfeiffer, Margaret A Tucker, Philip S Rosenberg. 1. Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7244, USA. wanderso@mail.nih.gov
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest that cutaneous malignant melanomas (CMM) may arise through divergent cancer pathways that are linked to intermittent versus accumulated sun exposure. However, numerous questions remain regarding the timing and/or age of exposure. METHODS: The authors systematically examined the effect of aging on CMM incidence in data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute. Standard descriptive epidemiology was supplemented with mathematical models. The impact of advancing age on CMM incidence was assessed by sex, histopathologic classification (superficial spreading melanoma [SSM] or lentigo maligna melanoma [LMM]), and anatomic site (face, head, and neck [FHN] or lower extremity [LE]). RESULTS: Sex, histopathology, and anatomic site were age-specific effect modifiers for CMM that indicated divergent (bimodal) early-onset and late-onset cancer pathways. Early-onset melanomas were associated predominantly with women, SSM, and LE. Late-onset melanomas were correlated with men, LMM, and FHN. Early- and late-onset melanoma populations were confirmed with age-period-cohort models that were adjusted for period and cohort effects. Two-component mixture models also fit the data better than a single cancer population. CONCLUSIONS: The current results were consistent with a divergent and age-dependent solar hypothesis for CMM. Early-onset melanomas may represent gene-sun exposure interactions that occur early (and/or intermittently) in life among susceptible individuals. Late-onset melanomas may reflect accumulated, lifelong sun exposure in comparatively less susceptible individuals. Future analytical studies should be powered adequately to account for this age-dependent effect modification both for acknowledged melanoma risk factors (sex, histopathology, and anatomic site) and for suspected melanoma risk factors, such as constituent genetic variants.
BACKGROUND: Emerging data suggest that cutaneous malignant melanomas (CMM) may arise through divergent cancer pathways that are linked to intermittent versus accumulated sun exposure. However, numerous questions remain regarding the timing and/or age of exposure. METHODS: The authors systematically examined the effect of aging on CMM incidence in data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program of the National Cancer Institute. Standard descriptive epidemiology was supplemented with mathematical models. The impact of advancing age on CMM incidence was assessed by sex, histopathologic classification (superficial spreading melanoma [SSM] or lentigo maligna melanoma [LMM]), and anatomic site (face, head, and neck [FHN] or lower extremity [LE]). RESULTS: Sex, histopathology, and anatomic site were age-specific effect modifiers for CMM that indicated divergent (bimodal) early-onset and late-onset cancer pathways. Early-onset melanomas were associated predominantly with women, SSM, and LE. Late-onset melanomas were correlated with men, LMM, and FHN. Early- and late-onset melanoma populations were confirmed with age-period-cohort models that were adjusted for period and cohort effects. Two-component mixture models also fit the data better than a single cancer population. CONCLUSIONS: The current results were consistent with a divergent and age-dependent solar hypothesis for CMM. Early-onset melanomas may represent gene-sun exposure interactions that occur early (and/or intermittently) in life among susceptible individuals. Late-onset melanomas may reflect accumulated, lifelong sun exposure in comparatively less susceptible individuals. Future analytical studies should be powered adequately to account for this age-dependent effect modification both for acknowledged melanoma risk factors (sex, histopathology, and anatomic site) and for suspected melanoma risk factors, such as constituent genetic variants.
Authors: William F Anderson; Nilanjan Chatterjee; William B Ershler; Otis W Brawley Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: C M Balch; A C Buzaid; S J Soong; M B Atkins; N Cascinelli; D G Coit; I D Fleming; J E Gershenwald; A Houghton; J M Kirkwood; K M McMasters; M F Mihm; D L Morton; D S Reintgen; M I Ross; A Sober; J A Thompson; J F Thompson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-08-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Janet L Maldonado; Jane Fridlyand; Hetal Patel; Ajay N Jain; Klaus Busam; Toshiro Kageshita; Tomomichi Ono; Donna G Albertson; Dan Pinkel; Boris C Bastian Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-12-17 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: David C Whiteman; Peter Watt; David M Purdie; Maria Celia Hughes; Nicholas K Hayward; Adèle C Green Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-06-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Yoram Cohen; Eli Rosenbaum; Shahnaz Begum; David Goldenberg; Clemens Esche; Ofer Lavie; David Sidransky; William H Westra Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-05-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Erin X Wei; Abrar A Qureshi; Jiali Han; Tricia Y Li; Eunyoung Cho; Jennifer Y Lin; Wen-Qing Li Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2016-07-16 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Nathaniel H Fleming; Jiaying Tian; Eleazar Vega-Saenz de Miera; Heidi Gold; Farbod Darvishian; Anna C Pavlick; Russell S Berman; Richard L Shapiro; David Polsky; Iman Osman Journal: Oncology Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: David C Gibbs; Irene Orlow; Jennifer I Bramson; Peter A Kanetsky; Li Luo; Anne Kricker; Bruce K Armstrong; Hoda Anton-Culver; Stephen B Gruber; Loraine D Marrett; Richard P Gallagher; Roberto Zanetti; Stefano Rosso; Terence Dwyer; Ajay Sharma; Emily La Pilla; Lynn From; Klaus J Busam; Anne E Cust; David W Ollila; Colin B Begg; Marianne Berwick; Nancy E Thomas Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 13.506