Literature DB >> 19535363

Mutagenicity testing for chemical risk assessment: update of the WHO/IPCS Harmonized Scheme.

David A Eastmond1, Andrea Hartwig, Diana Anderson, Wagida A Anwar, Michael C Cimino, Ivan Dobrev, George R Douglas, Takehiko Nohmi, David H Phillips, Carolyn Vickers.   

Abstract

Since the publication of the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) Harmonized Scheme for Mutagenicity Testing, there have been a number of publications addressing test strategies for mutagenicity. Safety assessments of substances with regard to genotoxicity are generally based on a combination of tests to assess effects on three major end points of genetic damage associated with human disease: gene mutation, clastogenicity and aneuploidy. It is now clear from the results of international collaborative studies and the large databases that are currently available for the assays evaluated that no single assay can detect all genotoxic substances. The World Health Organization therefore decided to update the IPCS Harmonized Scheme for Mutagenicity Testing as part of the IPCS project on the Harmonization of Approaches to the Assessment of Risk from Exposure to Chemicals. The approach presented in this paper focuses on the identification of mutagens and genotoxic carcinogens. Selection of appropriate in vitro and in vivo tests as well as a strategy for germ cell testing are described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19535363     DOI: 10.1093/mutage/gep014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  34 in total

1.  In vitro cytogenetic assessment and comparison of vildagliptin and sitagliptin.

Authors:  Ceren Börçek Kasurka; Mehmet Elbistan; Ayşegül Atmaca; Zülal Atlı Şekeroğlu
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Integration of in vivo genotoxicity and short-term carcinogenicity assays using F344 gpt delta transgenic rats: in vivo mutagenicity of 2,4-diaminotoluene and 2,6-diaminotoluene structural isomers.

Authors:  Naomi Toyoda-Hokaiwado; Tomoki Inoue; Kenichi Masumura; Hiroyuki Hayashi; Yuji Kawamura; Yasushi Kurata; Makiko Takamune; Masami Yamada; Hisakazu Sanada; Takashi Umemura; Akiyoshi Nishikawa; Takehiko Nohmi
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Chrysotile and rock wool fibers induce chromosome aberrations and DNA damage in V79 lung fibroblast cells.

Authors:  Yan Cui; Ji Ma; Wei Ye; Zhixia Han; Faqin Dong; Jianjun Deng; Qingbi Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Comparison of in vitro test systems using bacterial and mammalian cells for genotoxicity assessment within the "health-related indication value (HRIV) concept.

Authors:  Eva-Maria Prantl; Meike Kramer; Carsten K Schmidt; Martina Knauer; Stefan Gartiser; Aliaksandra Shuliakevich; Julia Milas; Hansruedi Glatt; Walter Meinl; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 5.  Mode of action-based risk assessment of genotoxic carcinogens.

Authors:  Andrea Hartwig; Michael Arand; Bernd Epe; Sabine Guth; Gunnar Jahnke; Alfonso Lampen; Hans-Jörg Martus; Bernhard Monien; Ivonne M C M Rietjens; Simone Schmitz-Spanke; Gerlinde Schriever-Schwemmer; Pablo Steinberg; Gerhard Eisenbrand
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 6.  Architecture in 3D cell culture: An essential feature for in vitro toxicology.

Authors:  Sophie A Lelièvre; Tim Kwok; Shirisha Chittiboyina
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 7.  Present state and future perspectives of using pluripotent stem cells in toxicology research.

Authors:  Anna M Wobus; Peter Löser
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Dose-response assessment of four genotoxic chemicals in a combined mouse and rat micronucleus (MN) and Comet assay protocol.

Authors:  Leslie Recio; Cheryl Hobbs; William Caspary; Kristine L Witt
Journal:  J Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.196

9.  Evaluation of potential carcinogenicity of organic chemicals in synthetic turf crumb rubber.

Authors:  Alaina N Perkins; Salmaan H Inayat-Hussain; Nicole C Deziel; Caroline H Johnson; Stephen S Ferguson; Rolando Garcia-Milian; David C Thompson; Vasilis Vasiliou
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 10.  Solution by dilution?--A review on the pollution status of the Yangtze River.

Authors:  Tilman Floehr; Hongxia Xiao; Björn Scholz-Starke; Lingling Wu; Junli Hou; Daqiang Yin; Xiaowei Zhang; Rong Ji; Xingzhong Yuan; Richard Ottermanns; Martina Roß-Nickoll; Andreas Schäffer; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.