Literature DB >> 27928753

Comparison of in vitro test systems using bacterial and mammalian cells for genotoxicity assessment within the "health-related indication value (HRIV) concept.

Eva-Maria Prantl1,2, Meike Kramer3, Carsten K Schmidt3, Martina Knauer4, Stefan Gartiser4, Aliaksandra Shuliakevich5, Julia Milas5, Hansruedi Glatt6, Walter Meinl6, Henner Hollert5.   

Abstract

In numerous cases, the German health-related indication value (HRIV) concept has proved its practicability for the assessment of drinking water relevant trace substances (Umweltbundesamt 2003). The HRIV is based on the toxicological profile of a substance. An open point of the HRIV concept has been the assignment of standardized test procedures to be used for the assessment. The level of the HRIV is at its lowest as soon as the genotoxicity of the substance is detected. As a single test on its own, it is not sufficient enough to assess the human toxicological relevance of a genotoxic effect or exclude it in the case of a negative result; a reasonable test battery was required, technically oriented towards the already harmonized international, hierarchical evaluation for toxicological assessment of chemicals. Therefore, an important aim of this project was to define a strategy for the genotoxicological assessment of anthropogenic trace substances. The basic test battery for genotoxicity of micropollutants in drinking water needs to fulfill several requirements. Although quick test results are needed for the determination of HRIV, a high degree of transferability to human genotoxicity should be ensured. Therefore, an in vitro genotoxicity test battery consisting of the Ames fluctuation test with two tester strains (ISO 11350), the umu test and the micronucleus test, or from the Ames test with five tester strains (OECD 471) and the micronucleus test is proposed. On the basis of selected test substances, it could be shown that the test battery leads to positive, indifferent, and negative results. Given indifferent results, the health authority and the water supplier must assume that it is a genotoxic substance. Genetically modified tester strains are being sensitive to different chemical classes by expression of selected mammalian key enzymes for example nitroreductase, acetyltransferase, and glutathione-S-transferase. These strains may provide valuable additional information and may give a first indication of the mechanism of action. To check this hypothesis, various additional strains expressing specific human-relevant enzymes were investigated. It could be shown that the additional use of genetically modified tester strains can enhance the detectable substance spectrum with the bacterial genotoxicological standard procedures or increase the sensitivity. The additional use provides orienting information at this level as a lot of data can be obtained quite quickly and with little effort. These indications of the mechanism of action should be however verified with a test system that uses mammalian cells, better human cells, to check their actual relevance. The selection of appropriate additional tester strains has to be defined from case to case depending on the molecular structure and also still requires some major expertise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drinking water; Genotoxicity; Germany; HRIV concept; Risk assessment; Test battery; Tox-Box

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27928753     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-8166-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  48 in total

1.  International round-robin study on the Ames fluctuation test.

Authors:  G Reifferscheid; H M Maes; B Allner; J Badurova; S Belkin; K Bluhm; F Brauer; J Bressling; S Domeneghetti; T Elad; S Flückiger-Isler; H J Grummt; R Gürtler; A Hecht; M B Heringa; H Hollert; S Huber; M Kramer; A Magdeburg; H T Ratte; R Sauerborn-Klobucar; A Sokolowski; P Soldan; T Smital; D Stalter; P Venier; Chr Ziemann; J Zipperle; S Buchinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Activation and inactivation of carcinogenic dihaloalkanes and other compounds by glutathione S-transferase 5-5 in Salmonella typhimurium tester strain NM5004.

Authors:  T Shimada; H Yamazaki; Y Oda; A Hiratsuka; T Watabe; F P Guengerich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Analysis of trifluorothymidine-resistant (TFTr) mutants of L5178Y/TK+/- mouse lymphoma cells.

Authors:  M M Moore; D Clive; J C Hozier; B E Howard; A G Batson; N T Turner; J Sawyer
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 4.  The SOS regulatory system of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J W Little; D W Mount
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Salmonella typhimurium mutagenicity tester strains that overexpress oxygen-insensitive nitroreductases nfsA and nfsB.

Authors:  C C Carroll; D Warnakulasuriyarachchi; M R Nokhbeh; I B Lambert
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  A sensitive umu test system for the detection of mutagenic nitroarenes in Salmonella typhimurium NM1011 having a high nitroreductase activity.

Authors:  Y Oda; T Shimada; M Watanabe; M Ishidate; T Nohmi
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Reproducibility of microbial mutagenicity assays: II. Testing of carcinogens and noncarcinogens in Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  V C Dunkel; E Zeiger; D Brusick; E McCoy; D McGregor; K Mortelmans; H S Rosenkranz; V F Simmon
Journal:  Environ Mutagen       Date:  1985

8.  Genotoxic activation of the environmental pollutant 3,6-dinitrobenzo[e]pyrene in Salmonella typhimurium umu strains expressing human cytochrome P450 and N-acetyltransferase.

Authors:  Yoshimitsu Oda; Teruhisa Hirayama; Tetsushi Watanabe
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 4.372

9.  Species differences in testicular necrosis and DNA damage, distribution and metabolism of 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP).

Authors:  M Låg; E J Søderlund; G Brunborg; J E Dahl; J A Holme; J G Omichinski; S D Nelson; E Dybing
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  1989-10-02       Impact factor: 4.221

10.  Mutagenicity of an aged gasworks soil during bioslurry treatment.

Authors:  Christine L Lemieux; Krista D Lynes; Paul A White; Staffan Lundstedt; Lars Oberg; Iain B Lambert
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.216

View more
  1 in total

1.  Editorial: Special Issue "Effect-related evaluation of anthropogenic trace substances-concepts for genotoxicity, neurotoxicity and endocrine effects".

Authors:  Tamara Grummt; Thomas-Benjamin Seiler; Thomas Braunbeck; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.