Literature DB >> 31555935

In vitro cytogenetic assessment and comparison of vildagliptin and sitagliptin.

Ceren Börçek Kasurka1, Mehmet Elbistan2, Ayşegül Atmaca3, Zülal Atlı Şekeroğlu4.   

Abstract

Vildagliptin and sitagliptin are commonly used antidiabetic drugs. Chromosomal aberration (CA), sister chromatid exchange (SCE) and cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assays were employed to assess and compare cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of these drugs. Peripheral lymphocytes were exposed to 125 μg/ml, 250 μg/ml and 500 μg/ml of vildagliptin and 250 μg/ml, 500 μg/ml and 1000 μg/ml of sitagliptin for 24 h and 48 h with and without exogenous metabolic activation. At the end of the study, it was determined that these drugs and their metabolites had no genotoxic effects on CA, SCE and CBMN. On the other hand, parallel to the increase in dose, vildagliptin showed weak cytotoxicity on the mitotic index, and depending on its increase in dose; sitagliptin caused potential cytotoxicity and cytostatic effect on the mitotic index, nuclear division index and proliferation index. Due to their cytotoxic and cytostatic potential, these drugs inhibit cell proliferation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antidiabetic; Comparison; In vitro genotoxicity; Sitagliptin; Vildagliptin

Year:  2019        PMID: 31555935      PMCID: PMC6874628          DOI: 10.1007/s10616-019-00345-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytotechnology        ISSN: 0920-9069            Impact factor:   2.058


  35 in total

1.  Genotoxicity evaluation of metformin and glimepiride by micronucleus assay in exfoliated urothelial cells of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Authors:  M K Harishankar; S Logeshwaran; S Sujeevan; K N Aruljothi; M A Dannie; A Devi
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 2.  Long-term studies of treatments for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  A Enrique Caballero
Journal:  Postgrad Med       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 3.  In vitro genotoxicity testing-Can the performance be enhanced?

Authors:  Raffaella Corvi; Federica Madia
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 6.023

4.  Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition: linking chemical properties to clinical safety.

Authors:  E Matteucci; O Giampietro
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  The in vitro micronucleus technique.

Authors:  M Fenech
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2000-11-20       Impact factor: 2.433

6.  On the mechanism of differential Giemsa staining of BrdU-substituted chromatids.

Authors:  G González-Gil; M H Navarrete
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Evaluation of Anti Cancer Effects of DPP-4 Inhibitors in Colon Cancer- An Invitro Study.

Authors:  C A Amritha; Punnagai Kumaravelu; D Darling Chellathai
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 8.  On the origin of serum CD26 and its altered concentration in cancer patients.

Authors:  Oscar J Cordero; Francisco J Salgado; Montserrat Nogueira
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 6.968

9.  Investigation of cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of the antihistaminic drug, loratadine, on human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Seval Kontaş; Zülal Atlı Şekeroğlu
Journal:  Drug Chem Toxicol       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 10.  Cancer biology in diabetes.

Authors:  Shi Sen; Yanzheng He; Daisuke Koya; Keizo Kanasaki
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.232

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.