Diurnal variability of C-reactive protein in obstructive sleep apnea.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the diurnal variability of C-reactive protein (CRP) in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS AND MEASUREMENTS: Participants included 44 women and men with untreated OSA (mean apnea/hypopnea index = 37.5, SD +/- 28) and 23 healthy adults with no OSA. Sleep was monitored with polysomnography in the University of California San Diego General Clinical Research Center. Over a 24-h period, blood was collected every 2 h, and CRP levels were determined.
RESULTS: Adjusting for age, gender, and body mass index, a significant group by time interaction showed that patients with OSA had higher CRP levels during the daytime (8:00 a.m.-8:00 p.m.) versus the nighttime (10:00 p.m. until 6:00 p.m.; p < 0.001). Non-apneics showed no significant change in CRP levels during the 24 h.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that sleep apnea patients have disproportionately elevated CRP levels in the day versus the nighttime, possibly as a result of carryover effects of nighttime arousal into the daytime.

Introduction

Inflammation is a hallmark of the pathophysiology of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and represents a pathway linking OSA to increased cardiovascular morbidity [1-3]. C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute phase response protein implicated in broad range of cardiovascular diseases [4]. Through its effects on adhesion molecules and mononuclear cell recruitment and adhesion [5, 6], CRP plays an important role in atherosclerosis development [7].

Independent of age and body mass index (BMI), CRP levels are found to be elevated in OSA and associated with severity of apnea as indexed by the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) [8-11], although not all studies demonstrate this relationship [12]. These studies of CRP and OSA have relied on a single blood sample obtained in the morning or afternoon hours to determine CRP levels, with few, if any, utilizing multiple blood sampling to examine the diurnal variation of CRP in OSA.

Studies in healthy individuals have not demonstrated a diurnal variation of CRP. Meier-Ewert et al., for example, determined CRP concentrations in hourly blood samples in 13 healthy individuals and found no rhythmic diurnal variation over a 24-h period [13]. Of relevance to OSA are studies examining the effects of sleep disruption and/or deprivation on CRP levels. In 43 otherwise healthy women, Okun et al. showed that elevated CRP levels (single samples obtained anywhere between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m.) were associated with self-reported sleep disruptions [14]. Laboratory studies of sleep deprivation report inconsistent findings. Frey et al. studied the effects of 40 h sleep deprivation in 19 healthy individuals; sampling CRP every 30 min revealed a significant decrease in CRP in morning levels (between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m.) and in late night levels (between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m.) [15]. Meier-Ewert et al. examined the effects of extended (88 h) and partial (4 h) sleep deprivation on CRP levels in ten healthy individuals; blood sampling every 60 to 90 min revealed that sleep deprivation was associated with marked elevation of daily averages of CRP levels [16]. In contrast to these studies, Dimitrov et al. using an 8-h sleep deprivation in 15 healthy individuals with blood sampling every 1.5 or 3 h showed no effects on CRP levels [17]. Thus, it is fair to say that the literature is not consistent concerning effects of sleep disruption on CRP.

The purpose of this study is to examine the diurnal pattern of CRP in individuals with OSA and to compare that pattern to that observed in otherwise healthy individuals with normal sleep.

Materials and methods

Forty-four women and men with untreated OSA and 23 healthy adults with no OSA were recruited by advertising and word of mouth referral. Participants were excluded if they reported a history of major medical illnesses (other than OSA and hypertension), current psychiatric diagnoses, or if they were receiving psychotropic medication. Patients who were receiving anti-hypertensive medications had their medications tapered for 3 weeks prior to participation. The protocol was approved by the University of California San Diego (UCSD) Human Subjects Committee. After description of the study, written informed consent was obtained.

Participants arrived at the UCSD General Clinical Research Center Gillin Laboratory of Sleep and Chronobiology (GCRC-GLSC) at 5:00 p.m., at which time, a venous catheter was inserted. Starting at 6:00 p.m., a blood sample was collected every 2 h for the next 24 h. Blood samples were collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, placed on ice, spun in a refrigerated centrifuge, and the plasma was stored at −80°C until assayed. CRP was assayed by using the high sensitivity Denka-Seiken assay [18]. The assay’s intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) is <1.0%, the inter-assay CV is 1.6%, and the sensitivity is <0.05 mg/l. To minimize intra-assay variance, all 12 samples from a participant were analyzed in the same run.

Starting at 8:00 p.m. the following evening (i.e., upon completion of the 24-h blood sampling), participants were instrumented for standard polysomnography [19]. Lights were out at 10:00 p.m., and recording continued until 7:00 a.m. Polysomnography records were scored by trained sleep technicians for total sleep time, total minutes spent awake after sleep onset (WASO), and apneas and hypopneas. Apneas were defined as decrements in airflow of ≥90% from baseline for ≥10 s. Hypopneas were defined as decrements in airflow of ≥50% but <90% from baseline for ≥10 s. The numbers of apneas and hypopneas per hour of sleep were calculated to obtain the AHI. A diagnosis of OSA was given if AHI ≥10.

Statistical analysis

Means and standard deviations or frequencies were calculated for demographic and apnea-related variables. Subject characteristics data were compared between apneics and non-apneics by one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables. Box-plots and histograms were used to examine distributions of CRP levels. Line-plots of CRP levels over a 24-h period for each subject were also graphed to assess trends in marker levels. Based on these graphs, we used a linear mixed-effects model approach to characterize the time-course of CRP levels over the 24-h period. These models were fitted with restricted maximum likelihood methods [20]. This modeling strategy was adopted because it is a flexible approach that can account for correlations between repeated measures on an individual, include patient-specific intercept and slope terms (referred to as random effects), adjust for potentially confounding covariates (referred to as fixed-effects), and allow for unbalanced data (i.e., different individuals can have different numbers of observations). Regarding unbalanced data, four participants did not have all 12 CRP data points (one OSA patient had nine, one OSA patient had ten, one control had nine, and one control had 11).

The model included a random effect at the patient level (random intercept term in the model) to allow for variability in initial CRP levels between individuals. The following covariates (fixed-effects) were also included in the models: OSA status (present versus absent: reference was participant’s without OSA), time (12 time points at the 2-h intervals with the analysis starting at the 10:00 p.m. time point), and potential confounders (age, BMI, and gender). Two separate models were run, one with time as a continuous variable and the other with time as a categorical night versus day variable. A likelihood ratio test was used to test the significance of the interaction between time and OSA status to assess whether profiles of CRP levels over the day varied by OSA status. Residual plots and quantile–quantile plots were used to assess adequacy of fit of the models. Data were analyzed using the R statistics software package (http://cran.stat.ucla.edu). CRP values were log-transformed prior to analysis to better approximate a Gaussian distribution. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Sample characteristics

Sample characteristics are presented in Table 1. The OSA group was older (F = 5.1, p < 0.05), had a greater BMI (F = 5.23, p < 0.5), as well as higher systolic (F = 15.1, p < 0.001) and diastolic (F = 4.43, p < 0.05) blood pressure. By definition, the AHI index was greater in those with OSA (F = 20.8, p < 0.001). OSA patients spent approximately 44.5 fewer minutes asleep (F = 13.3, p < 0.01). There was a marginally significant group difference for WASO (F = 3.54, p = 0.065), with OSA patients spending more time awake after the onset of sleep. Unadjusted mean 24-h CRP levels were marginally higher in sleep apneics (t = 1.91, p = 0.06). We also examined correlations between (log-transformed) CRP levels and AHI among all participants. Across the 12 individual CRP time points, correlations with AHI ranged from a low of r = 0.26 (p = 0.10) at the 8:00 p.m. time point to a high of r = 0.34 (p = 0.04) at the 4:00 p.m. time point. The mean CRP value correlated with AHI at r = 0.28, p ≤ 0.05.

Table 1

Sample characteristics

Variables (mean ± SD)	OSA	No OSA
Number	44	23
Age (years)a	50.4 (8)	46.1 (7.5)
Body mass index (kg/m2)a	30.4 (5.4)	27.4 (4.3)
Gender (number of women)	9	9
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg)b	132.9 (18.6)	116.6 (11.6)
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg)a	78.8 (9.5)	74.0 (8.2)
Number of cigarette smokers	6	5
Apnea/hypopnea indexb	37.5 (28.8)	4.78 (3.1)
Total sleep time (hours)b	6.17 (.74)	6.86 (.50)
Wake after sleep onset (minutes)	53.9 (24.9)	39.4 (29.2)

a p < 0.05

b p < 0.01

Diurnal rhythm

The CRP levels throughout the day are graphed in Figs. 1 and 2 according to group. Model results, including regression coefficients, slope, and p values, are presented in Table 2 for the two models that were fit. Model I was a mixed model starting time at 10:00 p.m. with time as a continuous variable. There were significant main effects of BMI (with higher BMI being associated with higher CRP levels; regression coefficient = 0.094, p < 0.001) and gender (with CRP levels being somewhat higher in women; regression coefficient = 0.667, p = 0.04) for the 24-h period. There was not a significant main effect (p = 0.27) or interaction (p = 0.13) for OSA group status.

Fig. 1

Individual participant’s 24-h CRP levels in OSA and healthy controls every 2 h starting at 10:00 p.m., with daytime denoted as 8:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m. and nighttime denoted as 10:00 p.m. until 6:00 a.m.

Fig. 2

Unadjusted 24-h CRP levels in OSA and healthy controls every 2 h starting at 10:00 p.m. (mean ± SEM). In an analysis adjusting for age, gender, and body mass index, patients with sleep apnea were found to have higher CRP levels during the daytime (8:00 a.m. until 8:00 p.m.) versus the nighttime (10:00 p.m. until 6:00 a.m.; p < 0.001); whereas, non-apneics showed no significant change in CRP levels during the 24 h

Table 2

Mixed-effects model results

	Beta slope	Std. Error	t-Statistic	p value
Model I (time modeled as a continuous linear variable)
Age	0.0202	0.016	1.285	0.20
BMI	0.094	0.025	3.770	<0.001
Gender	0.667	0.312	2.140	0.04
OSA group	0.328	0.294	1.115	0.27
Time	0.001	0.003	0.168	0.87
Time by OSA interaction	0.006	0.004	1.522	0.13
Model II (time modeled as a categorical day versus night variable)
Age	0.020	0.016	1.285	0.20
BMI	0.094	0.025	3.770	<0.001
Gender	0.667	0.312	2.140	0.04
OSA group	0.316	0.294	1.077	0.29
Daytime/nighttime	−0.020	0.024	−0.806	0.43
Daytime/nighttime by OSA interaction	0.081	0.030	2.738	0.01

Model II, also starting with the 10:00 p.m. sample, had time as categorical variable, with night from 10:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. and day from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. In addition to the same main effects for BMI and gender, a significant group by time interaction (regression coefficient = 0.081, p = 0.01) indicated that in the apneic group, mean CRP levels were higher during the day than at night (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in day versus night CRP levels for the group with no sleep apnea.

We also conducted several sensitivity analyses to assess the adequacy of our fitted models. First, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, as well as smoking status were added to the mixed-effects models and were not significantly associated with CRP levels and did not change the observed association between OSA and 24-h CRP levels. In other sensitivity analyses, we also fitted cosinor models [21] which are a well-established method for modeling sleep-wake circadian rhythms. Residual plots and Akaike information criteria indicated that the cosinor models did not fit the CRP data well, as would be expected given the reasonably stable CRP levels during the 24-h period evidenced in line-plots, especially among non-apneics.

Discussion

CRP is an important risk factor and biomarker for cardiovascular diseases [4-7]. Prior studies using morning or afternoon sampling found CRP to be elevated in individuals with OSA compared to non-OSA adults [8-11]. We found 24-h mean CRP levels to be marginally higher in the patients with OSA. By obtaining samples every 2 h during the 24-h period, we were able to demonstrate a diurnal difference in CRP levels in OSA, with daytime levels being significantly higher than nighttime levels. We observed this interaction in an analytic model with time as a categorical night versus day variable and not an analytic model with time as a continuous variable. We suspect that the categorical analysis, when the two groups had the maximum difference in CRP levels, gave us the best power to discern the interaction. The p value of the interaction for the time as a continuous variable was p = 0.13, and with a larger sample-size, a significant interaction might have emerged.

OSA is characterized by repeated disruptions of sleep. More periodic sleep disruptions, as assessed by subjective report, have been associated with elevated CRP levels [14]. Studies of more significant sleep disruption, i.e., sleep deprivation, report conflicting findings on CRP levels, including a decrease [15], increase [16], and no change [17] in CRP levels. Consistent with one prior study to examine this issue, we found no evidence of diurnal variation of CRP in healthy individuals not experiencing disrupted sleep [13], raising the question whether it is the disturbed sleep associated with apneas and hypopneas in OSA patients or some other characteristic of apnea patients that is the responsible for the effect on CRP diurnal rhythm.

A limitation of this study is that we characterized night as starting at 10:00 p.m. (when the lights were turned off in the GCRC-GLSC) and ending at 6:00 a.m. This definition of night would not have universally applied to the night/day schedule for all of the participants.

What mechanisms might underlie the effect of OSA on inducing a diurnal rhythm of CRP? Sleep disruption and partial sleep deprivation are both associated with sympathetic activation [22, 23]. Sleep apneics show elevated norepinephrine levels as compared to non-apneics [24]. The repeated disruption of sleep as determined by the number of apneic events and/or the severity of nocturnal hypoxia are directly associated with the elevated norepinephrine levels [25-27]. Some of the earliest observations with catecholamines indicated that nighttime sympathetic over-activity in OSA carried over to the daytime when apnea events were not occurring [26, 28]. Elevations in catecholamines are associated with elevations in CRP levels via hepatocyte β-adrenergic receptors triggering CRP biosynthesis and release [29, 30]. Another possible mechanism is inflammatory cytokines. CRP synthesis in the liver is controlled by interleukin-6 (IL-6) as well as by tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) [31]. A study by Entzian et al. in OSA reported no evidence of circadian rhythm change in ex vivo levels of IL-6 from cultured blood samples [32], although studies do indicate that circulating IL-6 levels are elevated in OSA [33]. Entzian et al. did report that the circadian rhythm of ex vivo TNF-α was disturbed in OSA such that the nocturnal physiologic peaks were absent but that an additional daytime peak was evident [32]. Thus, in addition to catecholamines, an additional potential mechanism of our findings is an effect of OSA on the diurnal rhythm of TNF-α.

What might be the significance of greater daytime than nighttime CRP levels in OSA? Studies link elevations in daytime CRP with other markers of increased cardiovascular risk, including with greater nighttime blood pressure variability and with non-dipping of blood pressure [34, 35]. Studies in OSA show increased risk for cardiovascular events in the daytime, and this risk is attributed to several mechanisms, including local and systemic inflammation [36, 37]. Regardless, our data suggests that in order to better understand inflammatory variables in OSA, fine-grained chronobiological analyses with frequent blood sampling will be invaluable.