Literature DB >> 19526493

Automatic quality assessment in structural brain magnetic resonance imaging.

Bénédicte Mortamet1, Matt A Bernstein, Clifford R Jack, Jeffrey L Gunter, Chadwick Ward, Paula J Britson, Reto Meuli, Jean-Philippe Thiran, Gunnar Krueger.   

Abstract

MRI has evolved into an important diagnostic technique in medical imaging. However, reliability of the derived diagnosis can be degraded by artifacts, which challenge both radiologists and automatic computer-aided diagnosis. This work proposes a fully-automatic method for measuring image quality of three-dimensional (3D) structural MRI. Quality measures are derived by analyzing the air background of magnitude images and are capable of detecting image degradation from several sources, including bulk motion, residual magnetization from incomplete spoiling, blurring, and ghosting. The method has been validated on 749 3D T(1)-weighted 1.5T and 3T head scans acquired at 36 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) study sites operating with various software and hardware combinations. Results are compared against qualitative grades assigned by the ADNI quality control center (taken as the reference standard). The derived quality indices are independent of the MRI system used and agree with the reference standard quality ratings with high sensitivity and specificity (>85%). The proposed procedures for quality assessment could be of great value for both research and routine clinical imaging. It could greatly improve workflow through its ability to rule out the need for a repeat scan while the patient is still in the magnet bore. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19526493      PMCID: PMC2780021          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  21 in total

1.  A comparison of C/B ratios from studies using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

Authors:  S B Cantor; C C Sun; G Tortolero-Luna; R Richards-Kortum; M Follen
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Flow and motion.

Authors:  D Saloner
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.266

3.  MRI quality control: six imagers studied using eleven unified image quality parameters.

Authors:  T Ihalainen; O Sipilä; S Savolainen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Motion artifact suppression: a review of post-processing techniques.

Authors:  M Hedley; H Yan
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Quality assurance of clinical MRI scanners using ACR MRI phantom: preliminary results.

Authors:  Chien-Chuan Chen; Yung-Liang Wan; Yau-Yau Wai; Ho-Ling Liu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  No-reference image quality metrics for structural MRI.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Woodard; Monica P Carley-Spencer
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2006

7.  Image analysis using mathematical morphology.

Authors:  R M Haralick; S R Sternberg; X Zhuang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 6.226

8.  Detection of degradation of magnetic resonance (MR) images: comparison of an automated MR image-quality analysis system with trained human observers.

Authors:  E A Gardner; J H Ellis; R J Hyde; A M Aisen; D J Quint; P L Carson
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Measuring signal-to-noise ratios in MR imaging.

Authors:  L Kaufman; D M Kramer; L E Crooks; D A Ortendahl
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  [Quality control in magnetic resonance for clinical use].

Authors:  F Podo
Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.663

View more
  56 in total

Review 1.  The Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: a review of papers published since its inception.

Authors:  Michael W Weiner; Dallas P Veitch; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Nigel J Cairns; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Enchi Liu; John C Morris; Ronald C Petersen; Andrew J Saykin; Mark E Schmidt; Leslie Shaw; Judith A Siuciak; Holly Soares; Arthur W Toga; John Q Trojanowski
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 21.566

Review 2.  Whitepapers on imaging infrastructure for research: Part 1: General workflow considerations.

Authors:  Bradley J Erickson; Tony Pan; Daniel S Marcus
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Sharing heterogeneous data: the national database for autism research.

Authors:  Dan Hall; Michael F Huerta; Matthew J McAuliffe; Gregory K Farber
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2012-10

Review 4.  Integrating ADNI results into Alzheimer's disease drug development programs.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Cummings
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 4.673

Review 5.  Function biomedical informatics research network recommendations for prospective multicenter functional MRI studies.

Authors:  Gary H Glover; Bryon A Mueller; Jessica A Turner; Theo G M van Erp; Thomas T Liu; Douglas N Greve; James T Voyvodic; Jerod Rasmussen; Gregory G Brown; David B Keator; Vince D Calhoun; Hyo Jong Lee; Judith M Ford; Daniel H Mathalon; Michele Diaz; Daniel S O'Leary; Syam Gadde; Adrian Preda; Kelvin O Lim; Cynthia G Wible; Hal S Stern; Aysenil Belger; Gregory McCarthy; Burak Ozyurt; Steven G Potkin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Automated image quality evaluation of structural brain MRI using an ensemble of deep learning networks.

Authors:  Sheeba J Sujit; Ivan Coronado; Arash Kamali; Ponnada A Narayana; Refaat E Gabr
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  The Healthy Brain Network Serial Scanning Initiative: a resource for evaluating inter-individual differences and their reliabilities across scan conditions and sessions.

Authors:  David O'Connor; Natan Vega Potler; Meagan Kovacs; Ting Xu; Lei Ai; John Pellman; Tamara Vanderwal; Lucas C Parra; Samantha Cohen; Satrajit Ghosh; Jasmine Escalera; Natalie Grant-Villegas; Yael Osman; Anastasia Bui; R Cameron Craddock; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.524

8.  Imputation Strategy for Reliable Regional MRI Morphological Measurements.

Authors:  Shaina Sta Cruz; Ivo D Dinov; Megan M Herting; Clio González-Zacarías; Hosung Kim; Arthur W Toga; Farshid Sepehrband
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2020-01

9.  Clinical Application of Automatic Segmentation of Medial Temporal Lobe Subregions in Prodromal and Dementia-Level Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Eske Christiane Gertje; John Pluta; Sandhitsu Das; Lauren Mancuso; Dasha Kliot; Paul Yushkevich; David Wolk
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.472

10.  Predicting clinical scores from magnetic resonance scans in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Cynthia M Stonnington; Carlton Chu; Stefan Klöppel; Clifford R Jack; John Ashburner; Richard S J Frackowiak
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.