| Literature DB >> 26552449 |
Koji Akeda1, Tomomi Yamada2, Nozomu Inoue3, Akinobu Nishimura4, Akihiro Sudo5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The progression of disc degeneration is generally believed to be associated with low back pain and/or degenerative lumbar diseases, especially in the elderly. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate changes in lumbar disc height using radiographic measurements and to investigate risk factors for development of disc height narrowing of the elderly.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26552449 PMCID: PMC4640385 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0798-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Disc height measurement. Ha: anterior disc height, Hp: posterior disc height, Ds: superior disc depth, Di: inferior disc depth. Disc height is expressed as the disc height index (DHI), which was calculated as: [(Ha + Hp)/(Ds + Di)] × 100
Anthropometric measurements
| Overall | Men | Women | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 197 | 62 | 135 |
| Age (years) | 70.1 ± 4.5 | 70.4 ± 4.1 | 69.9 ± 4.7 |
| Body height (cm) | 150.9 ± 7.3 | 158.0 ± 5.2* | 147.7 ± 5.6 |
| Body weight (kg) | 52.9 ± 7.5 | 57.7 ± 6.7* | 50.9 ± 7.0 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.2 ± 2.6 | 22.9 ± 2.3 | 23.3 ± 2.7 |
Anthropometric measurements at baseline are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD)
BMI body mass index
*p < 0.01 vs. men
Disc height index
| Disc level | Overall | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|---|
| L1-L2 | 21.9 ± 3.8 | 21.6 ± 3.9 | 22.1 ± 3.8 |
| L2-L3 | 24.0 ± 4.5 | 24.4 ± 4.6 | 23.7 ± 4.5 |
| L3-L4 | 26.2 ± 5.5 | 26.5 ± 5.0 | 26.0 ± 5.7 |
| L4-L5 | 26.9 ± 6.5 | 27.0 ± 6.1 | 26.8 ± 6.8 |
| L5-S1 | 27.9 ± 8.2 | 27.4 ± 8.6 | 28.0 ± 8.0 |
Disc height index (DHI) at baseline are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). There were no significant differences between men and women in the DHI of each disc level
Baseline characteristics of subjects
| Risk factors | Overall | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ( | |
| Low back pain | 97 (49) | 30 (48.3) | 67 (49.6) |
| Smoking | 27 (13.6) | 24 (38.7)* | 3 (2.2) |
| Knee pain | 95 (48) | 14 (22.6) | 61 (45.2) |
| Osteoporosis | 57 (28.8) | 5 (8.1) | 52 (38.5)* |
| Diabetes mellitusa | 7 (3.5) | 2 (3.2) | 5 (3.7) |
| Kidney disordera | 10 (5.1) | 1 (1.6) | 9 (6.7) |
| Liver disordera | 8 (4.0) | 2 (3.2) | 6 (4.4) |
| Gout a | 5 (2.5) | 2 (3.2) | 3 (2.2) |
| Hypertensiona | 79 (39.9) | 17 (27.4) | 62 (45.9) |
| Thyroid disordera | 8 (4.0) | 3 (4.8) | 5 (3.7) |
| Tuberculosisa | 9 (4.5) | 2 (3.2) | 7 (5.2) |
| Osteoporosisa | 27 (13.6) | 1 (1.6) | 26 (19.3)* |
| Knee OA | 44 (22.2) | 14 (22.6) | 52 (38.5)** |
| Calcification of AA | 83 (41.9) | 29 (46.8) | 54 (46.0) |
Data represent the number of subjects with the risk factor (percentage of total)
OA osteoarthritis, AA abdominal aorta
*p < 0.01, **p < 0.05 vs. men or women
atreatment history of the disease
Fig. 2Rate of change in disc height index (∆DHI). The ∆DHI shows a significant gradual decrease over the ten-year period (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3). An analysis of variance revealed no significant disc level and time-point interactions (p = 0.63). The ∆DHI at each level shows similar changes over ten years that did not differ significantly among the disc levels (p = 0.78)
Fig. 3Percentage of discs classified as severely and mildly decreased at each disc level by rate of change in disc height index (∆DHI). At each disc level, the severely decreased group was approximately 30% and the mildly decreased group was approximately 70%
Fig. 4Number of subjects with severely decreased disc height by disc level. The graph shows the number of subjects whose lumbar discs was identified as severely decreased at each level. The illustration below the graph is a representative image of the severely decreased degeneration pattern by number of subjects
Disc height measurement
| Variables | Odds ratio | 95 % CIs | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female gender | 2.59 | 1.14–4.76 | 0.0006 |
| Knee OA | 2.21 | 1.13–4.34 | 0.0197 |
| Low back pain | 2.11 | 1.20–3.69 | 0.0253 |
Disc height is expressed as the disc height index (DHI), which was calculated as: [(Ha + Hp)/Ds + Di] × 100
Ha anterior disc height, Hp posterior disc height, Ds superior disc depth, Di inferior disc depth