Literature DB >> 15280756

Lumbar instability and clinical symptoms: which is the more critical factor for symptoms: sagittal translation or segment angulation?

Tetsuhiro Iguchi1, Aritetsu Kanemura, Koichi Kasahara, Keizo Sato, Akira Kurihara, Shinichi Yoshiya, Kotaro Nishida, Hiroshi Miyamoto, Minoru Doita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between radiologic instability and its symptoms is controversial. Previous authors consider flexion-extension radiographs to be of little value in evaluating instability; however, the current authors consider the variation of results in evaluating radiologic instability to be the result of limitations in previous researchers' methods.
METHODS: In this report, sagittal translation and angulation at the L4-L5 segment were measured in flexion-extension films in 1,090 outpatients with low back and/or leg pain using a three-landmark measuring method. The symptoms of four groups with and without 3-mm translation and with and without 10 degrees angulation were compared for all the patients and for 280 age-matched patients using a scoring system. The age-matched patients were followed up for 4.6 years.
RESULTS: Results showed that patients with > or = 3-mm translation had significantly lower scores, indicating a limitation in their daily activities due to pain, than patients < 3-mm translation; however, no difference was observed between the groups in terms of angulation. The group with > or = 3-mm translation and > or = 10 degrees angulation significantly demonstrated the lowest scores at both evaluations during the initial visit and follow-up. This group had been suffering from low back and/or leg pain the longest and had visited the hospital significantly more often than other groups.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, translation of the lumbar segment has a greater influence than angulation on lumbar symptoms. The presence of both radiologic factors could be an indicator for persistence of the symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15280756     DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000102473.95064.9d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  30 in total

1.  Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Semirigid (WavefleX) and Rigid System for the Lumbar Spine.

Authors:  Do-Keun Kim; Hyunkeun Lim; Dae Cheol Rim; Chang Hyun Oh
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2016-06-30

2.  Measurement Performance of a Computer Assisted Vertebral Motion Analysis System.

Authors:  Reginald J Davis; David C Lee; Chip Wade; Boyle Cheng
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

3.  Is increased segmental motion early after lumbar discectomy related to poor clinical outcome 5 years later?

Authors:  K Halldin; B Zoëga; J Kärrholm; B I Lind; P Nyberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-06-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  The effect of loading rate and degeneration on neutral region motion in human cadaveric lumbar motion segments.

Authors:  Ralph E Gay; Brice Ilharreborde; Kristin Zhao; Emir Boumediene; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 5.  Degenerative lumbar intervertebral instability: what is it and how does imaging contribute?

Authors:  Antonio Leone; Victor N Cassar-Pullicino; Giuseppe Guglielmi; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Intimate relationship between instability and degenerative signs at L4/5 segment examined by flexion-extension radiography.

Authors:  Tetsuhiro Iguchi; Takuma Ozaki; Takaaki Chin; Nobuhiro Tsumura; Aritetsu Kanemura; Koichi Kasahara; Ryosuke Kuroda; Minoru Doita; Kotaro Nishida
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Intrasubject repeatability of in vivo intervertebral motion parameters using quantitative fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Alexander Breen; Rebecca Hemming; Fiona Mellor; Alan Breen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Paradoxical motion in L5-S1 adult spondylolytic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh; Shen Liang; Danny Louange; Razmi Rahmat; Hwan-Tak Hee; V P Kumar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Increase or decrease in stability after nucleotomy? Conflicting in vitro and in vivo results in the sheep model.

Authors:  Sandra Reitmaier; David Volkheimer; Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Anita Ignatius
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Dynamic motion characteristics of the lower lumbar spine: implication to lumbar pathology and surgical treatment.

Authors:  Minfei Wu; Shaobai Wang; Sean J Driscoll; Thomas D Cha; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.