Literature DB >> 19525545

The effect of stimulus delivery technique on perceived intensity functions for taste stimuli: implications for fMRI studies.

Lori Haase1, Barbara Cerf-Ducastel, Claire Murphy.   

Abstract

Classic psychophysical studies have provided significant information on the psychophysical functions for taste stimuli. With the advent of fMRI, studies are being conducted that provide insight into central processing of gustation in humans. However, fMRI experiments impose physical limitations on stimulus delivery. In the present study, we compared psychophysical functions relating perceived intensity to concentration, derived from previous studies that used the traditional sip-and-spit and dorsal flow delivery techniques, to psychophysical functions generated in this study using a simulated stimulus delivery technique (SSDT). The SSDT delivered minute quantities of taste stimuli to the dorsal surface of the tongue, just as in an fMRI scanner. As was hypothesized, the results indicated that slopes of intensity functions were dependent on the type of stimulus delivery technique. The SSDT resulted in slopes that were more similar to those generated by dorsal flow than by sip-and-spit stimulus delivery techniques, suggesting the importance of considering the influence of stimulus delivery on psychophysical response in designing and interpreting experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19525545      PMCID: PMC2853372          DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.5.1167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  22 in total

1.  Taste mixtures: is mixture suppression related to compression?

Authors:  L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1975-05

2.  Valid across-group comparisons with labeled scales: the gLMS versus magnitude matching.

Authors:  L M Bartoshuk; V B Duffy; B G Green; H J Hoffman; C-W Ko; L A Lucchina; L E Marks; D J Snyder; J M Weiffenbach
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-08

3.  Mixtures of substances with similar tastes. A test of a psychophysical model of taste mixture interactions.

Authors:  L M Bartoshuk; C T Cleveland
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1977-05

4.  Mutual action of taste and olfaction.

Authors:  C Murphy; W S Cain; L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1977-05

5.  Taste intensity as a function of area and concentration: differentiation between compounds.

Authors:  D V Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1971-02

6.  Bitterness of sweeteners as a function of concentration.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; B J Booth; M L Losee; S D Pecore; Z S Warwick
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Taste synergism between monosodium glutamate and disodium 5'-guanylate.

Authors:  B Rifkin; L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1980-06

8.  Taste and olfaction: independence vs interaction.

Authors:  C Murphy; W S Cain
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1980-03

9.  Bitter taste of saccharin related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil.

Authors:  L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Cortical activation in response to pure taste stimuli during the physiological states of hunger and satiety.

Authors:  Lori Haase; Barbara Cerf-Ducastel; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  5 in total

1.  Effects of selective adaptation on coding sugar and salt tastes in mixtures.

Authors:  Marion E Frank; Holly F Goyert; Bradley K Formaker; Thomas P Hettinger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Age-related functional changes in gustatory and reward processing regions: An fMRI study.

Authors:  Aaron Jacobson; Erin Green; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Effect of Magnitude Estimation of Pleasantness and Intensity on fMRI Activation to Taste.

Authors:  B Cerf-Ducastel; L Haase; C Murphy
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.833

4.  An fMRI study on the influence of sommeliers' expertise on the integration of flavor.

Authors:  Lionel Pazart; Alexandre Comte; Eloi Magnin; Jean-Louis Millot; Thierry Moulin
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Regional Variation of Bitter Taste and Aftertaste in Humans.

Authors:  Molly J Higgins; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 3.160

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.