Literature DB >> 21460117

Bifidobacterial diversity and the development of new microbial source tracking indicators.

Elisenda Ballesté1, Anicet R Blanch.   

Abstract

Many studies suggest a close relationship between species of Bifidobacterium and their hosts. Thus, species such as B. adolescentis and B. thermacidophilum subsp. porcinum have been proposed as potential indicators of human and porcine fecal pollution. The diversity of bifidobacteria in wastewaters (human and animal) and slurries is analyzed using nested PCR followed by denaturant gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). The sewage samples showed similar DGGE patterns. The predominant bands were recognized as B. adolescentis, B. longum, and two unidentified species related to B. adolescentis. A single band detected in poultry samples was identified as B. saeculare. Bifidobacterial diversity was higher within porcine and bovine samples. The main bands in porcine samples were identified as B. minimum, an unknown species, and B. thermophilum/B. thermacidophilum subsp. porcinum. The latter species was also identified among the main bands in bovine samples together with B. pseudolongum and B. ruminantium. We then attempted to isolate the host-specific strains. DGGE bands were examined to develop specific probes to screen environmental samples by colony hybridization and further isolation of strains from positively hybridized colonies. Bifidobacterial strains that are host associated by DGGE bands to human and pig were successfully isolated from the environment: B. adolescentis from human sewage samples and the unidentified species related to pig from slurries and slaughterhouse wastewater. Neither the poultry-associated B. saeculare nor the ruminant-associated B. pseudolongum could be isolated with the current methodology, suggesting either a low prevalence in the samples or failure of the culture to grow in the media used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21460117      PMCID: PMC3126448          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02198-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  60 in total

1.  The effect of reducing agents on the recovery of injured Bifidobacterium cells.

Authors:  Yolanda Nebra; Joan Jofre; Anicet R Blanch
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 2.  Molecular ecological analysis of the gastrointestinal microbiota: a review.

Authors:  Erwin G Zoetendal; Chad T Collier; Satoshi Koike; Roderick I Mackie; H Rex Gaskins
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Tracking the origin of faecal pollution in surface water: an ongoing project within the European Union research programme.

Authors:  Anicet R Blanch; Luis Belanche-Muñoz; Xavier Bonjoch; James Ebdon; Christophe Gantzer; Francisco Lucena; Jakob Ottoson; Christos Kourtis; Aina Iversen; Inger Kühn; Laura Moce; Maite Muniesa; Janine Schwartzbrod; Sylvain Skraber; George Papageorgiou; Huw D Taylor; Jessica Wallis; Joan Jofre
Journal:  J Water Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.744

4.  Development of microbial and chemical MST tools to identify the origin of the faecal pollution in bathing and shellfish harvesting waters in France.

Authors:  M Gourmelon; M P Caprais; S Mieszkin; R Marti; N Wéry; E Jardé; M Derrien; A Jadas-Hécart; P Y Communal; A Jaffrezic; A M Pourcher
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 11.236

5.  Integrated analysis of established and novel microbial and chemical methods for microbial source tracking.

Authors:  Anicet R Blanch; Lluís Belanche-Muñoz; Xavier Bonjoch; James Ebdon; Christophe Gantzer; Francisco Lucena; Jakob Ottoson; Christos Kourtis; Aina Iversen; Inger Kühn; Laura Mocé; Maite Muniesa; Janine Schwartzbrod; Sylvain Skraber; Georgios T Papageorgiou; Huw Taylor; Jessica Wallis; Joan Jofre
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  A novel galactooligosaccharide mixture increases the bifidobacterial population numbers in a continuous in vitro fermentation system and in the proximal colonic contents of pigs in vivo.

Authors:  George Tzortzis; Athanasios K Goulas; Jennifer M Gee; Glenn R Gibson
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Use of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron-specific alpha-1-6, mannanase quantitative PCR to detect human faecal pollution in water.

Authors:  H Yampara-Iquise; G Zheng; J E Jones; C Andrew Carson
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  Comparison of four polymerase chain reaction methods for the rapid detection of human fecal pollution in marine and inland waters.

Authors:  Dave S Bachoon; Cortney M Miller; Christen P Green; Ernesto Otero
Journal:  Int J Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-05

9.  Multiplex PCR with 16S rRNA gene-targeted primers of bifidobacterium spp. to identify sources of fecal pollution.

Authors:  X Bonjoch; E Ballesté; A R Blanch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Spatial and temporal variation of the intestinal bacterial community in commercially raised broiler chickens during growth.

Authors:  P W J J van der Wielen; D A Keuzenkamp; L J A Lipman; F van Knapen; S Biesterveld
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 4.552

View more
  9 in total

1.  Complete genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. longum KACC 91563.

Authors:  Jun-Sang Ham; Taeheon Lee; Mi-Jeong Byun; Kyung-Tae Lee; Min-Kyung Kim; Gi-Sung Han; Seok-Geun Jeong; Mi-Hwa Oh; Dong-Hun Kim; Heebal Kim
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  New molecular quantitative PCR assay for detection of host-specific Bifidobacteriaceae suitable for microbial source tracking.

Authors:  Marta Gómez-Doñate; Elisenda Ballesté; Maite Muniesa; Anicet R Blanch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Discovering new indicators of fecal pollution.

Authors:  Sandra L McLellan; A Murat Eren
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 4.  Waterborne pathogens: detection methods and challenges.

Authors:  Flor Yazmín Ramírez-Castillo; Abraham Loera-Muro; Mario Jacques; Philippe Garneau; Francisco Javier Avelar-González; Josée Harel; Alma Lilián Guerrero-Barrera
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2015-05-21

5.  Evaluation of five microbial and four mitochondrial DNA markers for tracking human and pig fecal pollution in freshwater.

Authors:  Xiwei He; Peng Liu; Guolu Zheng; Huimei Chen; Wei Shi; Yibin Cui; Hongqiang Ren; Xu-Xiang Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The Development of a Novel qPCR Assay-Set for Identifying Fecal Contamination Originating from Domestic Fowls and Waterfowl in Israel.

Authors:  Shoshanit Ohad; Shifra Ben-Dor; Jaime Prilusky; Valeria Kravitz; Bareket Dassa; Vered Chalifa-Caspi; Yechezkel Kashi; Efrat Rorman
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Anaerobic bacteria in wastewater treatment plant.

Authors:  Marcin Cyprowski; Agata Stobnicka-Kupiec; Anna Ławniczek-Wałczyk; Aleksandra Bakal-Kijek; Małgorzata Gołofit-Szymczak; Rafał L Górny
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Assessment of Bacterial Diversity of Industrial Poultry Wastewater by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) and the Cultivation Method in Order to Inform Its Reuse in Agriculture.

Authors:  Amira Oueslati; Wafa Hassen; Ali Ellafi; Sana Alibi; Ahlem Jaziri; Sarra Bachkouel; Imen Oueslati; Mejdi Snoussi; Mohd Adnan; Mitesh Patel; Abdelbaset Mohamed Elasbali; Hedi Ben Mansour
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.246

9.  Development of new host-specific Bacteroides qPCRs for the identification of fecal contamination sources in water.

Authors:  Marta Gómez-Doñate; Arnau Casanovas-Massana; Maite Muniesa; Anicet R Blanch
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.139

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.