Literature DB >> 19524285

Prognostic relevance of c-MYC gene amplification and polysomy for chromosome 8 in suboptimally-resected, advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Kathleen M Darcy1, William E Brady, Jan K Blancato, Robert B Dickson, William J Hoskins, William P McGuire, Michael J Birrer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) examined the prognostic relevance of c-MYC amplification and polysomy 8 in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).
METHODS: Women with suboptimally-resected, advanced stage EOC who participated in GOG-111, a multicenter randomized phase III trial of cyclophosphamide+cisplatin vs. paclitaxel+cisplatin, and who provided a tumor block through GOG-9404 were eligible. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with probes for c-MYC and the centromere of chromosome 8 (CEP8) was used to examine c-MYC amplification (> or =2 copies c-MYC/CEP8) and polysomy 8 (> or =4 CEP8 copies).
RESULTS: c-MYC amplification, defined as > or =2 copies c-MYC/CEP8, was observed in 29% (28/97) of EOCs and levels were ranged from 2.0-3.3 copies of c-MYC/CEP8. c-MYC amplification was not associated with patient age, race, GOG performance status, stage, cell type, grade, measurable disease status following surgery, tumor response or disease status following platinum-based combination chemotherapy. Women with vs. without c-MYC amplification did not have an increased risk of disease progression (hazard ratio [HR]=1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.65-1.64; p=0.884) or death (HR=1.08; 95% CI=0.68-1.72; p=0.745). c-MYC amplification was not an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (HR=1.03, 95% CI=0.57-1.85; p=0.922) or overall survival (HR=1.01, 95% CI=0.56-1.80; p=0.982). Similar insignificant results were obtained for c-MYC amplification categorized as > or =1.5 copies c-MYC/CEP8. Polysomy 8 was observed in 22 patients without c-MYC amplification and 3 with c-MYC amplification, and was associated with age and measurable disease status, but not other clinical covariates or outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: c-MYC amplification and polysomy 8 have limited predictive or prognostic value in suboptimally-resected, advanced stage EOC treated with platinum-based combination chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19524285      PMCID: PMC5806536          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  77 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of transcriptional repression by Myc.

Authors:  D Kleine-Kohlbrecher; S Adhikary; M Eilers
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 2.  The Oscar-worthy role of Myc in apoptosis.

Authors:  Natalie Meyer; Sam S Kim; Linda Z Penn
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 15.707

Review 3.  Transcriptional regulation and transformation by Myc proteins.

Authors:  Sovana Adhikary; Martin Eilers
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 4.  Conditional transgenic models define how MYC initiates and maintains tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Constadina Arvanitis; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 15.707

5.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of c-myc amplification in stage TNM prostate cancer in Japanese patients.

Authors:  Hirotaka Sato; Sadatsugu Minei; Takahiko Hachiya; Toshio Yoshida; Yukie Takimoto
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.369

6.  c-myc and chromosome 8 centromere studies of ovarian cancer by interphase FISH.

Authors:  Z R Wang; W Liu; S T Smith; R S Parrish; S R Young
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.362

7.  The Myc negative autoregulation mechanism requires Myc-Max association and involves the c-myc P2 minimal promoter.

Authors:  L M Facchini; S Chen; W W Marhin; J N Lear; L Z Penn
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Transcriptional activation by the human c-Myc oncoprotein in yeast requires interaction with Max.

Authors:  B Amati; S Dalton; M W Brooks; T D Littlewood; G I Evan; H Land
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Oncogene patterns in breast and ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  B Csókay; J Papp; I Besznyák; P Bösze; Z Sárosi; J Tóth; Z Zalay; E Oláh
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  C-myc, not HER-2/neu, can predict recurrence and mortality of patients with node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Claus M Schlotter; Ulf Vogt; Ulrich Bosse; Berthold Mersch; Katja Wassmann
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-01-13       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Translational research in the Gynecologic Oncology Group: evaluation of ovarian cancer markers, profiles, and novel therapies.

Authors:  Kathleen M Darcy; Michael J Birrer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Modeling high-grade serous ovarian carcinogenesis from the fallopian tube.

Authors:  Alison M Karst; Keren Levanon; Ronny Drapkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sequential treatment with aurora B inhibitors enhances cisplatin-mediated apoptosis via c-Myc.

Authors:  Yaxi Ma; Handi Cao; Siyue Lou; Xuejing Shao; Wen Lv; Xiaotian Qi; Yujia Liu; Meidan Ying; Qiaojun He; Xiaochun Yang
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Gene expression profile for predicting survival in advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer across two independent datasets.

Authors:  Kosuke Yoshihara; Atsushi Tajima; Tetsuro Yahata; Shoji Kodama; Hiroyuki Fujiwara; Mitsuaki Suzuki; Yoshitaka Onishi; Masayuki Hatae; Kazunobu Sueyoshi; Hisaya Fujiwara; Yoshiki Kudo; Kohei Kotera; Hideaki Masuzaki; Hironori Tashiro; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Ituro Inoue; Kenichi Tanaka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Synthetic lethal screens as a means to understand and treat MYC-driven cancers.

Authors:  Silvia Cermelli; In Sock Jang; Brady Bernard; Carla Grandori
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 6.915

6.  The polyoma virus large T binding protein p150 is a transcriptional repressor of c-MYC.

Authors:  Chang Kyoo Sung; Hyungshin Yim; Hongcang Gu; Dawei Li; Erik Andrews; Sekhar Duraisamy; Cheng Li; Ronny Drapkin; Thomas Benjamin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  c-MYC Copy-Number Gain Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Kyu Sang Lee; Yoonjin Kwak; Kyung Han Nam; Duck-Woo Kim; Sung-Bum Kang; Gheeyoung Choe; Woo Ho Kim; Hye Seung Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  miRNA profiling along tumour progression in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Olga Vaksman; Helene Tuft Stavnes; Janne Kaern; Claes G Trope; Ben Davidson; Reuven Reich
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  JQ1 suppresses tumor growth through downregulating LDHA in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Haifeng Qiu; Amanda L Jackson; Joshua E Kilgore; Yan Zhong; Leo Li-Ying Chan; Paola A Gehrig; Chunxiao Zhou; Victoria L Bae-Jump
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-03-30

Review 10.  DNA methylation profiles in ovarian cancer: implication in diagnosis and therapy (Review).

Authors:  Ourania Koukoura; Demetrios A Spandidos; Alexandros Daponte; Stavros Sifakis
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.