Literature DB >> 10409442

c-myc and chromosome 8 centromere studies of ovarian cancer by interphase FISH.

Z R Wang1, W Liu, S T Smith, R S Parrish, S R Young.   

Abstract

Forty tumor specimens from patients with ovarian cancer were studied for amplification of the c-myc oncogene relative to chromosome 8 centromere number using dual-color FISH. Interphase cytogenetic analysis showed amplification of the c-myc oncogene in 40% (16/40) of tumors using the standard oncogene:centromere ratio method of analysis. Eleven of these showed moderate amplification of c-myc, and 5 samples showed high amplification. Eight of the sixteen (50%) amplified tumors were polysomic centromere 8 as were 14 of the 24 (58%) non-amplified tumors. In previously reported work with these samples, the oncogene HER-2/neu, the chromosome 17 centromere, and the tumor suppressor gene p53 had been studied. When using the standard oncogene:centromere ratio criteria, 5 samples had amplification of both the c-myc and the HER-2/neu oncogenes, 5 samples had HER-2/neu amplification but not c-myc, 11 samples had c-myc amplification but not HER-2/neu, and 19 samples had neither oncogene amplified. The p53 gene was found to be deleted in 22.5% (9/40) of samples. The loss of the p53 gene did not appear to have any clinical correlation. The presence of an extra centromere 8 also did not appear to have any clinical correlation. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve for those patients who have c-myc amplification, while not statistically significant, appears to show a trend toward poorer survival. The survival curve for patients whose tumors have HER-2/neu amplification shows no clinical significance. It is of great interest, however, that the Kaplan-Meier plot of survival for patients whose tumors have amplification of both c-myc and HER-2/neu shows a significant difference (P = 0.047). The median survival times of the doubly amplified patient group and the non-doubly amplified groups were 12 and 43 months, respectively. This is the first study of the oncogene c-myc using FISH. The results suggest that the amplification of c-myc may indicate a poorer patient survival and that the amplification of both c-myc and HER-2/neu in combination may be a better prognostic indicator of poor patient survival. Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10409442     DOI: 10.1006/exmp.1999.2259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol        ISSN: 0014-4800            Impact factor:   3.362


  17 in total

1.  The genetic landscape of mutations in Burkitt lymphoma.

Authors:  Cassandra Love; Zhen Sun; Dereje Jima; Guojie Li; Jenny Zhang; Rodney Miles; Kristy L Richards; Cherie H Dunphy; William W L Choi; Gopesh Srivastava; Patricia L Lugar; David A Rizzieri; Anand S Lagoo; Leon Bernal-Mizrachi; Karen P Mann; Christopher R Flowers; Kikkeri N Naresh; Andrew M Evens; Amy Chadburn; Leo I Gordon; Magdalena B Czader; Javed I Gill; Eric D Hsi; Adrienne Greenough; Andrea B Moffitt; Matthew McKinney; Anjishnu Banerjee; Vladimir Grubor; Shawn Levy; David B Dunson; Sandeep S Dave
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  The MYC Oncogene Cooperates with Sterol-Regulated Element-Binding Protein to Regulate Lipogenesis Essential for Neoplastic Growth.

Authors:  Arvin M Gouw; Katherine Margulis; Natalie S Liu; Sudha J Raman; Anthony Mancuso; Georgia G Toal; Ling Tong; Adriane Mosley; Annie L Hsieh; Delaney K Sullivan; Zachary E Stine; Brian J Altman; Almut Schulze; Chi V Dang; Richard N Zare; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 27.287

3.  Amplification and overexpression of the L-MYC proto-oncogene in ovarian carcinomas.

Authors:  Rong Wu; Lin Lin; David G Beer; Lora H Ellenson; Barbara J Lamb; Jean-Marie Rouillard; Rork Kuick; Samir Hanash; Donald R Schwartz; Eric R Fearon; Kathleen R Cho
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Interrelationship between chromosome 8 aneuploidy, C-MYC amplification and increased expression in individuals from northern Brazil with gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Danielle-Queiroz Calcagno; Mariana-Ferreira Leal; Aline-Damaceno Seabra; Andre-Salim Khayat; Elizabeth Suchi Chen; Samia Demachki; Paulo Pimentel Assumpção; Mario Henrique Girão Faria; Silvia Helena Barem Rabenhorst; Márcia Valéria Pitombeira Ferreira; Marília de Arruda Cardoso Smith; Rommel-Rodríguez Burbano
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Combined array comparative genomic hybridization and tissue microarray analysis suggest PAK1 at 11q13.5-q14 as a critical oncogene target in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Peter Schraml; Georg Schwerdtfeger; Felix Burkhalter; Anna Raggi; Dietmar Schmidt; Teresa Ruffalo; Walter King; Kim Wilber; Michael J Mihatsch; Holger Moch
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.307

6.  Associations between ERBB2 amplification and progression-free survival and overall survival in advanced stage, suboptimally-resected epithelial ovarian cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  John Farley; Sartoru Fuchiuji; Kathleen M Darcy; Chunqiao Tian; William J Hoskins; William P McGuire; Parviz Hanjani; David Warshal; Benjamin E Greer; Jerome Belinson; Michael J Birrer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Prognostic value of HER-2/neu expression in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Dong Wang; Mulan Ren
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-07-20

8.  Induction of ovarian cancer by defined multiple genetic changes in a mouse model system.

Authors:  Sandra Orsulic; Yi Li; Robert A Soslow; Lynn A Vitale-Cross; J Silvio Gutkind; Harold E Varmus
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 31.743

9.  Prognostic relevance of c-MYC gene amplification and polysomy for chromosome 8 in suboptimally-resected, advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Kathleen M Darcy; William E Brady; Jan K Blancato; Robert B Dickson; William J Hoskins; William P McGuire; Michael J Birrer
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Modest effect of p53, EGFR and HER-2/neu on prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  P de Graeff; A P G Crijns; S de Jong; M Boezen; W J Post; E G E de Vries; A G J van der Zee; G H de Bock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.