Literature DB >> 19522976

Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density.

Paolo Trisi1, Giorgio Perfetti, Edoardo Baldoni, Davide Berardi, Marco Colagiovanni, Giuseppe Scogna.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Measuring peak insertion torque in relation to different bone densities, the present study seeks to determine whether micromotion at the interface is related to primary stability achieved by increasing insertion torque.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 120 Ti-Bone implants were placed in fresh bovine bone samples representing three density categories: hard, normal and soft (HNS). Five groups of peak insertion torque (20, 35, 45, 70 and 100 N/cm) were evaluated in the three bone density categories noted. Customized electronic equipment connected to a PC was used to register the peak and other insertion torque data. A loading device, consisting of a digital force gauge and a digital micrometer, was used to measure the micromovements of the implant during the application of 20, 25 and 30 N lateral forces. The data were analyzed for statistical significance by ANOVA and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient tests.
RESULTS: A statistically significant difference between implant micromobility placed with different levels of torque and in different bone densities was demonstrated by ANOVA. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient showed a high dependency between the peak insertion torque and the observed micromovement. Particularly, in soft bone, it was not possible to achieve more than 35 N/cm of peak insertion torque.
CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that increasing the peak insertion torque reduces the level of implant micromotion. In addition, micromotion in soft bone was found to be consistently high, which could lead to the failure of osseointegration. Thus, immediate functional loading of implants in soft bone should be considered with caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19522976     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01679.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  25 in total

1.  Relation between insertion torque and bone-implant contact percentage: an artificial bone study.

Authors:  Cheng Liu; Ming-Tzu Tsai; Heng-Li Huang; Michael Yuan-Chien Chen; Jui-Ting Hsu; Kuo-Chih Su; Chih-Han Chang; Aaron Yu-Jen Wu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation.

Authors:  Fawad Javed; Hameeda Bashir Ahmed; Roberto Crespi; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Interv Med Appl Sci       Date:  2013-12-20

Review 3.  Corrosion of Metallic Biomaterials: A Review.

Authors:  Noam Eliaz
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 4.  Osseodensification -- A systematic review and qualitative analysis of published literature.

Authors:  Ninad Milind Padhye; Ashvini Mukul Padhye; Neel B Bhatavadekar
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-11-02

Review 5.  On the fate of particles liberated from hydroxyapatite coatings in vivo.

Authors:  C F Dunne; J Gibbons; D P FitzPatrick; K J Mulhall; K T Stanton
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 1.568

6.  Differences in crestal bone-to-implant contact following an under-drilling compared to an over-drilling protocol. A study in the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  Omer Cohen; Zeev Ormianer; Haim Tal; Daniel Rothamel; Miron Weinreb; Ofer Moses
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  In-vitro development of a temporal abutment screw to protect osseointegration in immediate loaded implants.

Authors:  Herminio García-Roncero; Jordi Caballé-Serrano; Jordi Cano-Batalla; Josep Cabratosa-Termes; Oscar Figueras-Álvarez
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Biomechanical Stability of Dental Implants in Augmented Maxillary Sites: Results of a Randomized Clinical Study with Four Different Biomaterials and PRF and a Biological View on Guided Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Troedhan Angelo; Wainwright Marcel; Kurrek Andreas; Schlichting Izabela
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-12       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The Effect of Coronal Implant Design and Drilling Protocol on Bone-to-Implant Contact: A 3-Month Study in the Minipig Calvarium.

Authors:  Omer Cohen; Dieter D Bosshardt; Evegeny Weinberg; Gil Slutzkey; Ofer Moses
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to Increase Bone Density in Low-Density Bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep.

Authors:  Paolo Trisi; Marco Berardini; Antonello Falco; Michele Podaliri Vulpiani
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.