Literature DB >> 19520593

A method to separate conservative and magnetically-induced electric fields in calculations for MRI and MRS in electrically-small samples.

BuSik Park1, Andrew G Webb, Christopher M Collins.   

Abstract

This work presents a method to separately analyze the conservative electric fields (E(c), primarily originating with the scalar electric potential in the coil winding), and the magnetically-induced electric fields (E(i), caused by the time-varying magnetic field B1) within samples that are much smaller than one wavelength at the frequency of interest. The method consists of first using a numerical simulation method to calculate the total electric field (E(t)) and conduction currents (J), then calculating E(i) based on J, and finally calculating E(c) by subtracting E(i) from E(t). The method was applied to calculate electric fields for a small cylindrical sample in a solenoid at 600MHz. When a non-conductive sample was modeled, calculated values of E(i) and E(c) were at least in rough agreement with very simple analytical approximations. When the sample was given dielectric and/or conductive properties, E(c) was seen to decrease, but still remained much larger than E(i). When a recently-published approach to reduce heating by placing a passive conductor in the shape of a slotted cylinder between the coil and sample was modeled, reduced E(c) and improved B1 homogeneity within the sample resulted, in agreement with the published results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19520593      PMCID: PMC2722947          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2009.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  6 in total

1.  Signal-to-noise ratio and absorbed power as functions of main magnetic field strength, and definition of "90 degrees " RF pulse for the head in the birdcage coil.

Authors:  C M Collins; M B Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  The signal-to-noise ratio of the nuclear magnetic resonance experiment. 1976.

Authors:  D I Hoult; R E Richards
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Using a cross-coil to reduce RF heating by an order of magnitude in triple-resonance multinuclear MAS at high fields.

Authors:  F David Doty; Jatin Kulkarni; Christopher Turner; George Entzminger; Anthony Bielecki
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Consideration of magnetically-induced and conservative electric fields within a loaded gradient coil.

Authors:  Weihua Mao; Blaine A Chronik; Rebecca E Feldman; Michael B Smith; Christopher M Collins
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Resonator with reduced sample heating and increased homogeneity for solid-state NMR.

Authors:  Alexander Krahn; Uwe Priller; Lyndon Emsley; Frank Engelke
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Using low-E resonators to reduce RF heating in biological samples for static solid-state NMR up to 900 MHz.

Authors:  Peter L Gor'kov; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Conggang Li; Myriam Cotten; Jarrod J Buffy; Nathaniel J Traaseth; Gianluigi Veglia; William W Brey
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 2.229

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  A novel method to decrease electric field and SAR using an external high dielectric sleeve at 3 T head MRI: numerical and experimental results.

Authors:  Bu S Park; Sunder S Rajan; Joshua W Guag; Leonardo M Angelone
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  A method to measure specific absorption rate of nanoparticles in colloidal suspension using different configurations of radio-frequency fields.

Authors:  Dhivya Ketharnath; Rohit Pande; Leiming Xie; Srimeenakshi Srinivasan; Biana Godin; Jarek Wosik
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Faraday shields within a solenoidal coil to reduce sample heating: numerical comparison of designs and experimental verification.

Authors:  BuSik Park; Thomas Neuberger; Andrew G Webb; Don C Bigler; Christopher M Collins
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2009-10-04       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  RF Safety Evaluation of a Breast Tissue Expander Device for MRI: Numerical Simulation and Experiment.

Authors:  Bu S Park; Amir Razjouyan; Leonardo M Angelone; Brent McCright; Sunder S Rajan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.006

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.