Literature DB >> 11283997

Signal-to-noise ratio and absorbed power as functions of main magnetic field strength, and definition of "90 degrees " RF pulse for the head in the birdcage coil.

C M Collins1, M B Smith.   

Abstract

Calculations of the RF magnetic (B(1)) field as a function of frequency between 64 and 345 MHz were performed for a head model in an idealized birdcage coil. Absorbed power (P(abs)) and SNR were calculated at each frequency with three different methods of defining excitation pulse amplitude: maintaining 90 degrees flip angle at the coil center (center alpha = pi/2), maximizing FID amplitude (Max. A(FID)), and maximizing total signal amplitude in a reconstructed image (Max. A(image)). For center alpha = pi/2 and Max. A(image), SNR increases linearly with increasing field strength until 260 MHz, where it begins to increase at a greater rate. For these two methods, P(abs) increases continually, but at a lower rate at higher field strengths. Above 215 MHz in MRI of the human head, the use of FID amplitude to set B(1) excitation pulses may result in apparent decreases in SNR and power requirements with increasing static field strength. Magn Reson Med 45:684-691, 2001. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11283997     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  70 in total

1.  Calculation of SAR for Transmit Coil Arrays.

Authors:  Weihua Mao; Zhangwei Wang; Michael B Smith; Christopher M Collins
Journal:  Concepts Magn Reson Part B Magn Reson Eng       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 1.176

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: optimizing 3 Tesla imaging.

Authors:  Lauren Shapiro; Ernesto Staroswiecki; Garry Gold
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.800

3.  Assessing the Electromagnetic Fields Generated By a Radiofrequency MRI Body Coil at 64 MHz: Defeaturing Versus Accuracy.

Authors:  Elena Lucano; Micaela Liberti; Gonzalo G Mendoza; Tom Lloyd; Maria Ida Iacono; Francesca Apollonio; Steve Wedan; Wolfgang Kainz; Leonardo M Angelone
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Analysis of the role of lead resistivity in specific absorption rate for deep brain stimulator leads at 3T MRI.

Authors:  Leonardo M Angelone; Jyrki Ahveninen; John W Belliveau; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Exploring the limits of RF shimming for high-field MRI of the human head.

Authors:  Weihua Mao; Michael B Smith; Christopher M Collins
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Array-optimized composite pulse for excellent whole-brain homogeneity in high-field MRI.

Authors:  Christopher M Collins; Zhangwei Wang; Weihua Mao; Jieming Fang; Wanzhan Liu; Michael B Smith
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  13C MRS of occipital and frontal lobes at 3 T using a volume coil for stochastic proton decoupling.

Authors:  Shizhe Li; Yan Zhang; Shumin Wang; Maria Ferraris Araneta; Christopher S Johnson; Yun Xiang; Robert B Innis; Jun Shen
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 8.  Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Nicolae Bolog; Daniel Nanz; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  T1 weighted brain images at 7 Tesla unbiased for Proton Density, T2* contrast and RF coil receive B1 sensitivity with simultaneous vessel visualization.

Authors:  Pierre-François Van de Moortele; Edwards J Auerbach; Cheryl Olman; Essa Yacoub; Kâmil Uğurbil; Steen Moeller
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Numerical field calculations considering the human subject for engineering and safety assurance in MRI.

Authors:  Christopher M Collins
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.