Literature DB >> 19520371

Using two palpable measurements improves the subject-specific femoral modeling.

Weidong Luo1, Steven J Stanhope, Frances T Sheehan.   

Abstract

Subject-specific musculoskeletal models are essential to biomedical research and clinical applications, such as customized joint replacement, computer-aided surgical planning, gait analysis and automated segmentation. Generating these models from CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is time and resource intensive, requiring special skills. Therefore, in many studies individual bone models are approximated by scaling a generic template. Thus, the primary goal of this study was to determine a set of clinically available parameters (palpable measures and demographic data) that could improve the prediction of femoral dimensions, as compared to predicting these variables using uniform scaling based on palpable length. Similar to previous non-homogenous anthropometric scaling methods, the non-homogenous scaling method proposed in this study improved the prediction over uniform scaling of five key femoral measures. Homogenous scaling forces all dimensions of an object to be scaled equally, whereas non-homogenous scaling allows the dimensions to be scaled independently. The largest improvement was in femoral depth, where the coefficient of determination (r(2)) improved from 0.22 (homogenous) to 0.60 (non-homogeneous). In general, the major advantage of this non-homogenous scaling method is its ability to support the accurate and rapid generation of subject-specific femoral models since all parameters can be collected clinically, without imaging or invasive methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19520371      PMCID: PMC2727693          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  14 in total

1.  Correlation between pre-operative periprosthetic bone density and post-operative bone loss in THA can be explained by strain-adaptive remodelling.

Authors:  J Kerner; R Huiskes; G H van Lenthe; H Weinans; B van Rietbergen; C A Engh; A A Amis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Femoral anatomy, computed tomography and computer-aided design of prosthetic implants.

Authors:  Frank Adam; D S Hammer; D Pape; D Kohn
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2002-01-12       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: A subject-specific approach.

Authors:  Oliver Kessler; Shantanu Patil; Stephan Wirth; Wirth Stefan; Eckart Mayr; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates.

Authors:  K Radermacher; F Portheine; M Anton; A Zimolong; G Kaspers; G Rau; H W Staudte
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Radiograph processing for quantitative assessment of bone remodelling.

Authors:  A L Audenino; E M Zanetti; P M Calderale
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  A three-dimensional musculoskeletal database for the lower extremities.

Authors:  T M Kepple; H J Sommer; K Lohmann Siegel; S J Stanhope
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  An anthropometric scaling method with application to the knee joint.

Authors:  W D Lew; J L Lewis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  A nonhomogeneous anthropometric scaling method based on finite element principles.

Authors:  J L Lewis; W D Lew; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Three-dimensional osteometric scaling and normative modelling of skeletal segments.

Authors:  H J Sommer; N R Miller; G J Pijanowski
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  A model of lower extremity muscular anatomy.

Authors:  R A Brand; R D Crowninshield; C E Wittstock; D R Pedersen; C R Clark; F M van Krieken
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.097

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dynamic sagittal plane trunk control during anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Frances T Sheehan; William H Sipprell; Barry P Boden
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Anthropometric measurements to design best-fit femoral stem for the Indian population.

Authors:  Br Rawal; Rahul Ribeiro; Rajesh Malhotra; Naresh Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.251

3.  Greater trochanter location measurement using a three-dimensional motion capture system during prone hip extension.

Authors:  Ji-Su Yu; Jae-Seop Oh
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2017-02-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.