Literature DB >> 19513705

The influence of ureteral stent on renal pelvic pressure in vivo.

Yi Shao1, Zhi-jie Shen, Jian Zhuo, Hai-tao Liu, Sheng-qiang Yu, Shu-Jie Xia.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore the influence of ureteral stent on renal pelvic pressure by urodynamic study. 41 patients (with unilateral renal and/or ureteral calculi) after minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) were placed a 4.7-Fr ureteral stent and 16-Fr nephrostomy tube. Renal pelvic pressure of these patients was measured by urodynamic study at the 5-7 days after MPCNL. Renal pelvic pressure (RPP), intraabdominal pressure (IAP), and vesical pressure (VP) during the filling and voiding phases were detected by urodynamic study with intravesical perfusion. At the baseline, intraabdominal pressure (IAP(0)) was 27.52 +/- 7.03 cmH(2)O, renal pelvic pressure (RPP(0)) was 33.07 +/- 7.04 cmH(2)O; at the maximum cystometric bladder capacity (MCBC) during the filling phase, vesical pressure (VP(vol)) was 41.61 +/- 10.34 cmH(2)O, renal pelvic pressure (RPP(vol)) was 39.44 +/- 7.33 cmH(2)O; at the maximum vesical pressure during the voiding phase, vesical pressure (VP(max)) was 74.95 +/- 12.79 cmH(2)O, renal pelvic pressure (RPP(max)) was 65.68 +/- 17.03 cmH(2)O. (1) There was a strong relationship between RPP(0) and IAP(0) (P = 0.0001); (2) There was statistical significance among RPP(0), RPP(vol) and RPP(max) (P = 0.0001); (3) RPP was higher than 40 cmH(2)O during the voiding phase, and it was obviously relevant to the VP (P = 0.0001) but not to the MCBC (P = 0.2696). RPP increased mildly during the filling phase and dramatically during the voiding phase after stenting. RPP increased higher than the level required for a backflow (40 cmH(2)O) during the voiding phase. So it was encouraged to remove the stent at earlier stage or decrease using the ureteral stent if possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19513705     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-009-0199-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  20 in total

1.  Renal pelvic pressure responds with augmented increases to increments in intraabdominal pressure.

Authors:  I Karnak; M Bingöl-Koloğlu; E Karaağaoğlu; N Büyükpamukçu; F C Tanyel
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.545

2.  Use of a temporary ureteral drainage stent after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: results from a phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  James E Lingeman; Glenn M Preminger; Yithak Berger; John D Denstedt; Lawrence Goldstone; Joseph W Segura; Brian K Auge; James D Watterson; Ramsay L Kuo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Late complications of ureteral stents.

Authors:  A Ringel; S Richter; M Shalev; I Nissenkorn
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Routine ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteral lithiasis: is it really necessary?

Authors:  N R Netto; J Ikonomidis; C Zillo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  The indwelling ureteric stent: a 'friendly' procedure with unfriendly high morbidity.

Authors:  S Richter; A Ringel; M Shalev; I Nissenkorn
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 6.  Outcomes of stenting after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ghulam Nabi; J Cook; J N'Dow; S McClinton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-02-20

7.  The effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function in geriatric patients in the early postoperative period.

Authors:  Adem Tok; Savas Ozturk; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Ahmet Hamdi Tefekli; Rumeyza Kazancioglu; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Increased intra-abdominal pressure results in both obstructive and nonobstructive types of impairments of renal pelvic excretion.

Authors:  Meltem Bingol-Kologlu; Eser Lay Ergün; Biray Caner; NebiI Büyükpamukçu; Feridun Cahit Tanyel
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Nonstented versus routine stented ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Yi Shao; Jian Zhuo; Xiao-Wen Sun; Wei Wen; Hai-Tao Liu; Shu-Jie Xia
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-09-17

10.  Identifying patients who are suitable for stentless ureteroscopy following treatment of urolithiasis.

Authors:  Brent K Hollenbeck; Timothy G Schuster; Brian D Seifman; Gary J Faerber; J Stuart Wolf
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  Intravesical stent position as a predictor of quality of life in patients with indwelling ureteral stent.

Authors:  Fam Xeng Inn; Nurzarina Ahmed; Loo Guo Hou; Zainal Adwin Zainal Abidin; Lim Li Yi; Zulkifli Md Zainuddin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.370

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.