Literature DB >> 11547052

Routine ureteral stenting after ureteroscopy for ureteral lithiasis: is it really necessary?

N R Netto1, J Ikonomidis, C Zillo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the cost-effectiveness of routine ureteral stenting after ureteroscopic stone removal.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 295 consecutive patients who underwent rigid ureteroscopic stone removal 133 in group 1 and 162 in group 2 were randomized to receive and not receive a stent, respectively, after the procedure. Operative time, stone size, stone location, success rate, postoperative pain and complications were analyzed in each group.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the 2 groups regarding stone size, stone location, success rate, postoperative pain or complications. However, in group 1 operative time was significantly longer than in group 2 (chi-square test p = 0.019). The hospital charge per patient when placing and not placing a stent after ureteroscopy for stone removal was $9,900.95 and $3,661.78, respectively. The female patients with a stent without a suture required an extra charge for stent removal in the operating room, while no men had a stent with a suture.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine catheter placement after ureteroscopic stone removal increased operative time and did not seem to improve patient outcome. The cost was 30% that without a stent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11547052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  28 in total

Review 1.  Barriers to generalizability of health economic evaluations in Latin America and the Caribbean region.

Authors:  Federico Augustovski; Cynthia Iglesias; Andrea Manca; Michael Drummond; Adolfo Rubinstein; Sebastián García Martí
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Ureteral stenting practices following routine ureteroscopy: an international survey.

Authors:  Jorge F Pereira; Paul Bower; Eric Jung; Egor Parkhomenko; Timothy Tran; Simone Thavaseelan; Gyan Pareek
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  A cost analysis of stenting in uncomplicated semirigid ureteroscopic stone removal.

Authors:  Stephan Seklehner; Karl-Dietrich Sievert; Richard Lee; Paul F Engelhardt; Claus Riedl; Thomas Kunit
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Does the use of ureteral stents with extraction strings increase urinary infection rates?

Authors:  Yuval Freifeld; Demitry Goldin; Luai Khalili; Boris Friedman; Leonid Boyarsky; Ilan Klein; Faris Gazy; Avi Stein; Yoram Dekel
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Is stone diameter a variable in the decision process of employing a ureteral stent in patients undergoing uncomplicated ureterorenoscopy and associated intracorporeal lithotripsy?

Authors:  Stefano C M Picozzi; Cristian Ricci; Robert Stubinski; Stefano Casellato; Dario Ratti; Alberto Macchi; Giorgio Bozzini; Luca Carmignani
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  [Management of ureteral stones].

Authors:  M Straub; M Bader; F Strittmatter
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  Meta-analysis of postoperatively stenting or not in patients underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Turun Song; Banghua Liao; Shuo Zheng; Qiang Wei
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2011-05-15

8.  Is routine ureteral stenting necessary after uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy for lower ureteral stones larger than 1 cm?

Authors:  Kenan Isen; Isen Kenan; Salih Bogatekin; Bogatekin Salih; Suat Em; Em Suat; Huseyin Ergin; Ergin Huseyin; Vehbi Kilic; Kilic Vehbi
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2008-04-02

9.  The influence of ureteral stent on renal pelvic pressure in vivo.

Authors:  Yi Shao; Zhi-jie Shen; Jian Zhuo; Hai-tao Liu; Sheng-qiang Yu; Shu-Jie Xia
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-06-10

10.  Indications of stented uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Chung-Jing Wang; Shi-Wei Huang; Chien-Hsing Chang
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-01-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.