Literature DB >> 18953665

The effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function in geriatric patients in the early postoperative period.

Adem Tok1, Savas Ozturk, Abdulkadir Tepeler, Ahmet Hamdi Tefekli, Rumeyza Kazancioglu, Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu.   

Abstract

Since percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is a surgical intervention, it may show deteriorative effects on renal function in the early postoperative period. In this study, the deteriorative effects of PNL on renal function were investigated in the geriatric population, and it was compared to the non-geriatric population.A total of 711 patients [64 in the geriatric group (female/male ratio: 33/31, mean age: 70.4 +/- 4.2 years), 647 in the non-geriatric group (female/male ratio: 267/380, mean age: 40.9 +/- 12.7 years)] were included in the study. Demographic data, biochemical parameters, stone diameters, duration of the operation and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) were recorded both preoperatively and postoperatively.The eGFR ratio (post-/preoperative) was 1.13 +/- 1.00 in the geriatric group, 0.98 +/- 0.20 in the non-geriatric group (P < 0.001). Although the mean stone diameter was larger in the geriatric group than the non-geriatric group (10.08 +/- 6.5 mm, 8.28 +/- 5.54 mm, P = 0.037), the mean duration of the operation was shorter in the geriatric group than in the non-geriatric group (55.7 +/- 13.6 min, 61.3 +/- 20.9 min, P = 0.036). Hematocrit, hemoglobin, urea levels, and grade of hydronephrosis were not different between the groups.Renal function impairment is expected to be common in the geriatric patient population since they already have lower basal renal function. In the present study, the ratio of postoperative to preoperative eGFR was higher in the geriatric group. Hematocrit, hemoglobin, and urea levels and degree of hydronephrosis of these two groups did not show a great difference. The relatively short duration of the operation in the geriatric group and the diversity of perioperative and postoperative care of these two groups may explain the difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18953665     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-008-9482-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  10 in total

1.  Relationship of spontaneous passage of ureteral calculi to stone size and location as revealed by unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  Deirdre M Coll; Michael J Varanelli; Robert C Smith
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Treatment of renal calculi in the elderly.

Authors:  L B Kandel
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

4.  Influence of percutaneous renal stone extraction on renal function.

Authors:  K Geterud; G Granérus; C Henriksson; M Moonen
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  1988

5.  Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients aged 60 years or older.

Authors:  A Sahin; N Atsü; E Erdem; S Oner; C Bilen; M Bakkaloğlu; S Kendi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Effect of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on differential renal function as measured by mercaptoacetyl triglycine nuclear renography.

Authors:  James R Chatham; Thomas E Dykes; William G Kennon; Bradley F Schwartz
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  [Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in subjects over the age of 70: a multicentre retrospective study of 210 cases].

Authors:  Bertrand Doré; Pierre Conort; Jacques Irani; J Amiel; Jean-Marie Ferrière; Pascal Glémain; Jacques Hubert; Eric Lechevallier; Paul Meria; Christian Saussine; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  Prog Urol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.915

8.  Short-term and stabilized effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on the kidney.

Authors:  A Tasca; A D'Angelo; F Zattoni; P Ferrarese; L Calò; F Bui; P Cagnato
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy vs open surgery for renal calculi. A comparative study.

Authors:  G M Preminger; R V Clayman; S W Hardeman; J Franklin; T Curry; P C Peters
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Renal effects of percutaneous stone removal.

Authors:  M Eshghi; R G Schiff; A D Smith
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 2.649

  10 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Review on renal recovery after anatrophic nephrolithotomy: Are we really healing our patients?

Authors:  Leonardo de Albuquerque Dos Santos Abreu; Douglas Gregório Camilo-Silva; Gustavo Fiedler; Gustavo Barboza Corguinha; Matheus Miranda Paiva; João Antonio Pereira-Correia; Valter José Fernandes Muller
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

2.  Impacts of percutaneous nephrolithotomy on the estimated glomerular filtration rate during the first few days after surgery.

Authors:  Akbar Nouralizadeh; Mehrdad Mohammadi Sichani; Amir H Kashi
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-09-18

3.  The influence of ureteral stent on renal pelvic pressure in vivo.

Authors:  Yi Shao; Zhi-jie Shen; Jian Zhuo; Hai-tao Liu; Sheng-qiang Yu; Shu-Jie Xia
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-06-10

4.  Effect of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy on early renal function: Does it deteriorate?

Authors:  Seyed Reza Hosseini; Mohammad Ghasem Mohseni; Hamzeh Roshan; Farshid Alizadeh
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2015-09-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.