Literature DB >> 19509357

Impact of cancer on health-related quality of life of older Americans.

Bryce B Reeve1, Arnold L Potosky, Ashley Wilder Smith, Paul K Han, Ron D Hays, William W Davis, Neeraj K Arora, Samuel C Haffer, Steven B Clauser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of cancer on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is poorly understood because of the lack of baseline HRQOL status before cancer diagnosis. To our knowledge, this is the first population-based study to quantify the nature and extent of HRQOL changes from before to after cancer diagnosis for nine types of cancer patients and to compare their health with individuals without cancer.
METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registry data were linked with the Medicare Health Outcomes Survey (MHOS) data; data were collected from Medicare beneficiaries who were aged 65 years and older from 1998 through 2003. Cancer patients (n = 1432; with prostate, breast, colorectal, lung, bladder, endometrial, or kidney cancers; melanoma; or non-Hodgkin lymphoma [NHL]) were selected whose first cancer diagnosis occurred between their baseline and follow-up MHOS assessments. Control subjects without cancer (n = 7160) were matched to cancer patients by use of propensity scores that were estimated from demographics and comorbid medical conditions. Analysis of covariance models were used to estimate changes in HRQOL as assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 survey (mean score = 50, SD = 10). All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS: Patients with all cancer types (except melanoma and endometrial cancer) reported statistically significant declines in physical health (mean scores: prostate cancer = -3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -2.5 to -4.2; breast cancer = -3.5, 95% CI = -2.5 to -4.5; bladder cancer = -4.3, 95% CI = -2.5 to -6.1; colorectal cancer = -4.4, 95% CI = -3.3 to -5.5; kidney cancer = -5.7, 95% CI = -3.2 to -8.2; NHL = -6.7, 95% CI = -4.4 to -9.1; and lung cancer = -7.5, 95% CI = -5.9 to -9.2) compared with the control subjects (mean score = -1.8, 95% CI = -1.6 to -2.0) (all P < .05). However, only lung (mean score = -5.4, 95% CI = -3.5 to -7.2), colorectal (mean score = -3.5, 95% CI = -2.2 to -4.7), and prostate (mean score = -2.8, 95% CI = -1.8 to -3.7) cancer patients showed statistically significant decreases in mental health relative to the mean change of the control subjects (mean score = -1.2, 95% CI = -0.9 to -1.4) (all P < .05).
CONCLUSION: These findings provide validation of the specific deleterious effects of cancer on HRQOL and an evidence base for future research and clinical interventions aimed at understanding and remediating these effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19509357      PMCID: PMC2720781          DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  31 in total

1.  The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it?

Authors:  R D Hays; J M Woolley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Norman; Jeff A Sloan; Kathleen W Wyrwich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Are healthier older adults choosing managed care?

Authors:  Gail A Jensen; Michael A Morrisey
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2004-02

4.  The nurses' health study: a cohort of US women followed since 1976.

Authors:  G A Colditz
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr

5.  Health-related quality-of-life effects of radical prostatectomy and primary radiotherapy for screen-detected or clinically diagnosed localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  J B Madalinska; M L Essink-Bot; H J de Koning; W J Kirkels; P J van der Maas; F H Schröder
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  The persistent impact of breast carcinoma on functional health status: prospective evidence from the Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  Y L Michael; I Kawachi; L F Berkman; M D Holmes; G A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  The impact of cancer treatment on quality of life outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  C G Bacon; E Giovannucci; M Testa; I Kawachi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Functional impact of breast cancer by age at diagnosis.

Authors:  Candyce H Kroenke; Bernard Rosner; Wendy Y Chen; Ichiro Kawachi; Graham A Colditz; Michelle D Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Health-related quality of life of cancer and noncancer patients in Medicare managed care.

Authors:  Frank Baker; Samuel C Haffer; Maxine Denniston
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Cancer survivors in the United States: age, health, and disability.

Authors:  Maria Hewitt; Julia H Rowland; Rosemary Yancik
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.053

View more
  79 in total

1.  Quality of life during the course of cancer treatment in older newly diagnosed patients. Results of a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  M T E Puts; J Monette; V Girre; C Wolfson; M Monette; G Batist; H Bergman
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  The association between chronic disease burden and quality of life among breast cancer survivors in Missouri.

Authors:  Anjali D Deshpande; Julianne A Sefko; Donna B Jeffe; Mario Schootman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Cancer survivorship research in Europe and the United States: where have we been, where are we going, and what can we learn from each other?

Authors:  Julia H Rowland; Erin E Kent; Laura P Forsythe; Jon Håvard Loge; Lars Hjorth; Adam Glaser; Vittorio Mattioli; Sophie D Fosså
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The prognostic value of pre-diagnosis health-related quality of life on survival: a prospective cohort study of older Americans with lung cancer.

Authors:  Laura C Pinheiro; Timothy M Zagar; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Sexual activity and body image: examining gender variability and the influence of psychological distress in cancer patients.

Authors:  Jessica Krok; Tamara Baker; Susan McMillan
Journal:  J Gend Stud       Date:  2013-10-01

6.  Association between Time since Cancer Diagnosis and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Population-Level Analysis.

Authors:  Shi-Yi Wang; Sylvia H Hsu; Cary P Gross; Tara Sanft; Amy J Davidoff; Xiaomei Ma; James B Yu
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Patient and provider communication about employment following a cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Janet S de Moor; Kisha Coa; Erin E Kent; Carmen Moten; Sarah Kobrin; Cheryl Altice; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.442

8.  Cancer survivors in the United States: prevalence across the survivorship trajectory and implications for care.

Authors:  Janet S de Moor; Angela B Mariotto; Carla Parry; Catherine M Alfano; Lynne Padgett; Erin E Kent; Laura Forsythe; Steve Scoppa; Mark Hachey; Julia H Rowland
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 9.  Disease drivers of aging.

Authors:  Richard J Hodes; Felipe Sierra; Steven N Austad; Elissa Epel; Gretchen N Neigh; Kristine M Erlandson; Marissa J Schafer; Nathan K LeBrasseur; Christopher Wiley; Judith Campisi; Mary E Sehl; Rosario Scalia; Satoru Eguchi; Balakuntalam S Kasinath; Jeffrey B Halter; Harvey Jay Cohen; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Tim A Ahles; Nir Barzilai; Arti Hurria; Peter W Hunt
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  The Possibilities for Activity Scale (PActS): Development, validity, and reliability.

Authors:  Mackenzi Pergolotti; Malcolm P Cutchin
Journal:  Can J Occup Ther       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.614

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.