BACKGROUND: A number of studies have computed the minimally important difference (MID) for health-related quality of life instruments. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is consistency in the magnitude of MID estimates from different instruments. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify studies that computed an MID and contained sufficient information to compute an effect size (ES). Thirty-eight studies fulfilled the criteria, resulting in 62 ESs. RESULTS: For all but 6 studies, the MID estimates were close to one half a SD (mean = 0.495, SD = 0.155). There was no consistent relationship with factors such as disease-specific or generic instrument or the number of response options. Negative changes were not associated with larger ESs. Population-based estimation procedures and brief follow-up were associated with smaller ESs, and acute conditions with larger ESs. An explanation for this consistency is that research in psychology has shown that the limit of people's ability to discriminate over a wide range of tasks is approximately 1 part in 7, which is very close to half a SD. CONCLUSION: In most circumstances, the threshold of discrimination for changes in health-related quality of life for chronic diseases appears to be approximately half a SD.
BACKGROUND: A number of studies have computed the minimally important difference (MID) for health-related quality of life instruments. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is consistency in the magnitude of MID estimates from different instruments. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify studies that computed an MID and contained sufficient information to compute an effect size (ES). Thirty-eight studies fulfilled the criteria, resulting in 62 ESs. RESULTS: For all but 6 studies, the MID estimates were close to one half a SD (mean = 0.495, SD = 0.155). There was no consistent relationship with factors such as disease-specific or generic instrument or the number of response options. Negative changes were not associated with larger ESs. Population-based estimation procedures and brief follow-up were associated with smaller ESs, and acute conditions with larger ESs. An explanation for this consistency is that research in psychology has shown that the limit of people's ability to discriminate over a wide range of tasks is approximately 1 part in 7, which is very close to half a SD. CONCLUSION: In most circumstances, the threshold of discrimination for changes in health-related quality of life for chronic diseases appears to be approximately half a SD.
Authors: C Quinten; C Kenis; L Decoster; P R Debruyne; I De Groof; C Focan; F Cornelis; V Verschaeve; C Bachmann; D Bron; S Luce; G Debugne; H Van den Bulck; J C Goeminne; A Baitar; K Geboers; B Petit; C Langenaeken; R Van Rijswijk; P Specenier; G Jerusalem; J P Praet; K Vandenborre; M Lycke; J Flamaing; K Milisen; J P Lobelle; H Wildiers Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Adam S DeConde; Jess C Mace; Vijay R Ramakrishnan; Jeremiah A Alt; Timothy L Smith Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2017-08-04 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Jennifer L Barton; John Imboden; Jonathan Graf; David Glidden; Edward H Yelin; Dean Schillinger Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Weidong Lu; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Rachel A Freedman; Im Hee Shin; Nancy U Lin; Ann H Partridge; David S Rosenthal; Jennifer A Ligibel Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-10-14
Authors: Neuza Silva; Marco Pereira; Christiane Otto; Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer; Maria Cristina Canavarro; Monika Bullinger Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-05-04 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Sandra R Wilson; Robert A Wise; Mario Castro; Michael J Mulligan; Estela Ayala; Alan Chausow; Qiwen Huang; Santosh Gummidipundi Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: H Jacobi; M Rakowicz; R Rola; R Fancellu; C Mariotti; P Charles; A Dürr; M Küper; D Timmann; C Linnemann; L Schöls; O Kaut; C Schaub; A Filla; L Baliko; B Melegh; J-S Kang; P Giunti; B P C van de Warrenburg; R Fimmers; T Klockgether Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 3.847
Authors: Maria Jose Catalan; Jose Antonio Molina-Arjona; Pablo Mir; Esther Cubo; Jose Matias Arbelo; Pablo Martinez-Martin Journal: J Neurol Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Nicholas A Kolaitis; Allison Soong; Pavan Shrestha; Hanjing Zhuo; John Neuhaus; Patti P Katz; John R Greenland; Jeffrey Golden; Lorriana E Leard; Rupal J Shah; Steven R Hays; Jasleen Kukreja; Mary Ellen Kleinhenz; Paul D Blanc; Jonathan P Singer Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 5.209