Literature DB >> 19506498

Intranasal dexmedetomidine premedication is comparable with midazolam in burn children undergoing reconstructive surgery.

Mark D Talon1, Lee C Woodson, Edward R Sherwood, Asle Aarsland, Laksmi McRae, Tobin Benham.   

Abstract

Preoperative anxiety and emergence delirium in children continue to be common even with midazolam premedication. Midazolam is unpleasant tasting even with a flavored vehicle and as a result, patient acceptance is sometimes poor. As an alternative, we evaluated dexmedetomidine administered intranasally. Dexmedetomidine an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist is tasteless, odorless, and painless when administered by this route. Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists produce sedation, facilitate parental separation, and improve conditions for induction of general anesthesia, while preserving airway reflexes. Institutional review board approval was obtained to study 100 pediatric patients randomized to intranasal dexmedetomidine (2 microg/kg) or oral midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) administered 30 to 45 minutes before the surgery. Subjects received general anesthesia with oxygen, nitrous oxide, isoflurane, and analgesics (0.05-0.1 mg/kg morphine or 0.1 mg/kg methadone). Nurses and anesthetists were blinded to the drug administered and evaluated patients for preoperative sedation, conditions for induction of general anesthesia, emergence from anesthesia, and postoperative pain. Responses of 100 patients (50 dexmedetomidine and 50 midazolam) were analyzed. Dexmedetomidine (P=.003) was more effective than midazolam at inducing sleep preoperatively. Dexmedetomidine and midazolam were comparable for conditions at induction (P>0.05), emergence from anesthesia (P>0.05), or postoperative pain (P>0.05). Both drugs were equieffective in these regards. In pediatric patients, dexmedetomidine 2 microg/kg administered intranasally and midazolam 0.5 mg/kg administered orally produced similar conditions during induction and emergence of anesthesia. Intranasal administration of dexmedetomidine is more effective at inducing sleep and in some circumstances offers a useful alternative to oral midazolam in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19506498     DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3181abff90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Burn Care Res        ISSN: 1559-047X            Impact factor:   1.845


  29 in total

Review 1.  Incidence of bradycardia in pediatric patients receiving dexmedetomidine anesthesia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Maowei Gong; Yuanyuan Man; Qiang Fu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2016-12-31

2.  Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Prakhar Gyanesh; Rudrashish Haldar; Divya Srivastava; Prashant Mohan Agrawal; Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari; P K Singh
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Analgesia, sedation and arousal status in burn patients: the gap between recommendations and current practices.

Authors:  A Lavrentieva; N Depetris; I Rodini
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2017-06-30

4.  Efficacy of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Conscious Sedation in Patients Undergoing Surgical Removal of Impacted Third Molar: A Double-Blind Split Mouth Study.

Authors:  Sujeeth Kumar Shetty; Garima Aggarwal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-04-21

Review 5.  Efficacy and safety of intranasal ketamine compared with intranasal dexmedetomidine as a premedication before general anesthesia in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Priyanka Dwivedi; Tejas K Patel; Vijeta Bajpai; Yashpal Singh; Alka Tripathi; Suerkha Kishore
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 6.713

6.  Comparison of two Intranasal Sedatives, Midazolam versus Dexmedetomidine, in Children with High Dental Fear: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Katayoun Salem; Hossein Khoshrang; Elham Esmaeeli; Mona Vatankhah
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2022-06

7.  Pain management following myringotomy and tube placement: intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal fentanyl.

Authors:  Elisabeth Dewhirst; Gina Fedel; Vidya Raman; Julie Rice; N'Diris Barry; Kris R Jatana; Charles Elmaraghy; Meredith Merz; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.675

8.  Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Intranasal Clonidine as a Premedication in Surgery.

Authors:  Gurkaran Kaur Sidhu; Seema Jindal; Gurpreet Kaur; Gurpreet Singh; Kewal Krishan Gupta; Shobha Aggarwal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 1.967

9.  Premedication: Is clonidine the answer?

Authors:  Senthil Gopalakrishnan; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2012-01

10.  Intranasal dexmedetomidine for paediatric sedation for diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Authors:  Uday S Ambi; Chhaya Joshi; Anilkumar Ganeshnavar; Es Adarsh
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.