Literature DB >> 19502980

Revision cochlear implantation.

Daniel M Zeitler1, Cameron L Budenz, John Thomas Roland.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cochlear implantation is a well tolerated and effective procedure in the rehabilitation of profoundly and severely hearing-impaired individuals. Cochlear reimplantation may be necessary for a variety of reasons. The recent literature regarding the indications, surgical considerations, and outcomes in revision cochlear implant (RCI) surgery is reviewed here. RECENT
FINDINGS: A small but significant percentage (3-8%) of all cochlear implant procedures requires RCI surgery. The most common indication for RCI is hard failure (40-80%), but other common indications include soft failures, wound complications, infection, improper initial placement, and electrode extrusions. There is a high rate of surgical success in RCI with preservation or improvement of preoperative performance in the majority of patients, in addition to the alleviation of prereimplantation symptoms. Both children and adults benefit from RCI when indicated and experience similar auditory successes following RCI.
SUMMARY: The need for RCI is uncommon, but the potential for restoration or improvement in speech perception and alleviation of symptoms exists. Regardless of indication, RCI surgery is well tolerated, and, with thoughtful preparation, individualized patient counseling, and proper surgical technique, most patients can expect successful outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19502980     DOI: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e32832dd6ac

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 1068-9508            Impact factor:   2.064


  8 in total

1.  The histopathology of revision cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Joonhan Lee; Donald K Eddington; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Surgical findings and auditory performance after cochlear implant revision surgery.

Authors:  R Manrique-Huarte; A Huarte; M J Manrique
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Electrode migration after cochlear implant surgery: more common than expected?

Authors:  Aarno Dietz; Minna Wennström; Antti Lehtimäki; Heikki Löppönen; Hannu Valtonen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Management of major post-cochlear implant wound infections.

Authors:  Wong-Kein Low; Mahalakshmi Rangabashyam; Feifan Wang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Comparisons of Auditory Performance and Speech Intelligibility after Cochlear Implant Reimplantation in Mandarin-Speaking Users.

Authors:  Chung-Feng Hwang; Hui-Chen Ko; Yung-Ting Tsou; Kai-Chieh Chan; Hsuan-Yeh Fang; Che-Ming Wu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Feasibility of Revision Cochlear Implant Surgery for Better Speech Comprehension.

Authors:  Kyurin Hwang; Jae Yong Lee; Hyeon Seok Oh; Byung Don Lee; Jinsei Jung; Jae Young Choi
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2019-03-13

7.  Cochlear implant revision surgeries in children.

Authors:  Maria Stella Arantes do Amaral; Ana Cláudia Mirândola B Reis; Eduardo T Massuda; Miguel Angelo Hyppolito
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-02-16

8.  Intra-operative radiological diagnosis of a tip roll-over electrode array displacement using fluoroscopy, when electrophysiological testing is normal: the importance of both techniques in cochlear implant surgery.

Authors:  Octavio Garaycochea; Raquel Manrique-Huarte; Manuel Manrique
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.