Literature DB >> 19497351

Differential novelty detection in rats selectively bred for novelty-seeking behavior.

Santiago J Ballaz1.   

Abstract

"Novelty-seeking" behavior describes the variability of rats' locomotor response, namely high and low responders (HR and LR respectively), when exposed to a novel environment. Novelty-seeking in the rat is considered to model "sensation-seeking" in humans, a personality trait related to substance abuse. It is assumed that HR rats and LR rats differ in their emotional reactivity because of the disparate incentive value of contextual stimulus, thus differentially interacting with their environment. However, little is known about how HR and LR rats recognize novelty arising from the environment. The present study evaluates whether phenotype may affect spontaneous, non-spatial novelty discrimination. Selectively bred HR and LR rats were submitted to the novel-object recognition test. The task involved a delay of 3h after a first encounter with an object ("old"), which had to be discriminated from a second object ("new"). Object discrimination was assessed minute-by-minute during a 3-min choice session. Amnesic effects of scopolamine (0.5mg/kg, intraperitoneal) were also analyzed. HR-bred rats showed sustained novel-object recognition throughout the 3-min choice session, whereas LR-bred rats began to discriminate between objects only in the last minute. Surprisingly, level of discrimination in scopolamine-treated HR-bred rats was significant during the first minute of the choice test and diminished thereafter, presumably because both objects became equally familiar as they were explored. Additionally, scopolamine induced changes in muscarine M(2) receptor gene expression in a phenotype-dependent manner. Because consistent object discrimination mainly arises during the first minute, these findings may reflect differential novelty detection in HR-bred respect to LR-bred rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19497351      PMCID: PMC3087883          DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.05.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  23 in total

1.  Muscarinic M2 receptor mRNA expression and receptor binding in cholinergic and non-cholinergic cells in the rat brain: a correlative study using in situ hybridization histochemistry and receptor autoradiography.

Authors:  M T Vilaró; K H Wiederhold; J M Palacios; G Mengod
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.590

2.  Selective muscarinic antagonists differentially affect in vivo acetylcholine release and memory performances of young and aged rats.

Authors:  M G Vannucchi; C Scali; S R Kopf; G Pepeu; F Casamenti
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration.

Authors:  P V Piazza; J M Deminière; M Le Moal; H Simon
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-09-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Central cholinergic pathways in the rat: an overview based on an alternative nomenclature (Ch1-Ch6).

Authors:  M M Mesulam; E J Mufson; B H Wainer; A I Levey
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 5.  Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior.

Authors:  M T Bardo; R L Donohew; N G Harrington
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Dopaminergic and cholinergic antagonism in a novel-object detection task with rats.

Authors:  J Besheer; K R Short; R A Bevins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-29       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Use of high and low responders to novelty in rat studies on the role of the ventral striatum in radial maze performance: effects of intra-accumbens injections of sulpiride.

Authors:  A R Cools; B Ellenbroek; D Heeren; L Lubbers
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.273

8.  Individual responses to novelty are associated with differences in behavioral and neurochemical profiles.

Authors:  K Antoniou; G Papathanasiou; E Papalexi; T Hyphantis; G G Nomikos; C Spyraki; Z Papadopoulou-Daifoti
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. II: Effects of piracetam and pramiracetam.

Authors:  A Ennaceur; A Cavoy; J C Costa; J Delacour
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1989-06-01       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Reactivity to novelty during youth as a predictive factor of cognitive impairment in the elderly: a longitudinal study in rats.

Authors:  F Dellu; W Mayo; M Vallée; M Le Moal; H Simon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-08-08       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  4 in total

1.  After-hyperpolarization currents and acetylcholine control sigmoid transfer functions in a spiking cortical model.

Authors:  Jesse Palma; Massimiliano Versace; Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Persistence and storage of activity patterns in spiking recurrent cortical networks: modulation of sigmoid signals by after-hyperpolarization currents and acetylcholine.

Authors:  Jesse Palma; Stephen Grossberg; Massimiliano Versace
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 3.  Acetylcholine Neuromodulation in Normal and Abnormal Learning and Memory: Vigilance Control in Waking, Sleep, Autism, Amnesia and Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.492

4.  Resonant Cholinergic Dynamics in Cognitive and Motor Decision-Making: Attention, Category Learning, and Choice in Neocortex, Superior Colliculus, and Optic Tectum.

Authors:  Stephen Grossberg; Jesse Palma; Massimiliano Versace
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.677

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.