Literature DB >> 8402399

Use of high and low responders to novelty in rat studies on the role of the ventral striatum in radial maze performance: effects of intra-accumbens injections of sulpiride.

A R Cools1, B Ellenbroek, D Heeren, L Lubbers.   

Abstract

High and low responders to novelty (Wistar rats) were selected with the help of an open-field test and then equipped with intra-accumbens cannulae. They were then tested in a simple four-arm radial maze during 5 successive days, three trials per day, following intra-accumbens injections of distilled water or the dopaminergic D2 antagonist (+/-)-sulpiride. The injections were given 15 min before the first trial on each day. Both types of drug-naive rats reached the same level of performance on day 5. However, high responders made more visits, more revisits, and needed less time to make the first visit than low responders. Moreover, high responders showed their greatest increase in learning 2 days earlier than low responders. It is discussed that these differences between high and low responders are not due simply to differences in locomotor activity, but are due to a subtle, but important, difference in the mode of learning between both types. Sulpiride significantly attenuated the learning in both rat types; however, its effect in high responders was much less than that in low responders. It is suggested that the effects of sulpiride are not due to changes in locomotor activity, motivation, or perception, but are due to a learning deficit. The data are discussed in view of the genetic variation in the neurochemical and neurobiological makeup of the nucleus accumbens in both types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8402399     DOI: 10.1139/y93-052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0008-4212            Impact factor:   2.273


  9 in total

Review 1.  Catecholaminergic based therapies for functional recovery after TBI.

Authors:  Nicole D Osier; C Edward Dixon
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  A study on the role of the dorsal striatum and the nucleus accumbens in allocentric and egocentric spatial memory consolidation.

Authors:  Elvira De Leonibus; Alberto Oliverio; Andrea Mele
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Analysis of the biphasic locomotor response to ethanol in high and low responders to novelty: a study in Nijmegen Wistar rats.

Authors:  M A Gingras; A R Cools
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Differential novelty detection in rats selectively bred for novelty-seeking behavior.

Authors:  Santiago J Ballaz
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  The modulatory role of accumbens and hippocampus D2 receptors in anxiety and memory.

Authors:  Mohaddeseh Ebrahimi-Ghiri; Mohammad Nasehi; Mohammad-Reza Zarrindast
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Persistent cognitive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury: A dopamine hypothesis.

Authors:  James W Bales; Amy K Wagner; Anthony E Kline; C Edward Dixon
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  6-Hydroxydopamine-Induced Dopamine Reductions in the Nucleus Accumbens, but not the Medial Prefrontal Cortex, Impair Cincinnati Water Maze Egocentric and Morris Water Maze Allocentric Navigation in Male Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Amanda A Braun; Robyn M Amos-Kroohs; Arnold Gutierrez; Kerstin H Lundgren; Kim B Seroogy; Charles V Vorhees; Michael T Williams
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.911

8.  Coping with Space Neophobia in Drosophila melanogaster: The Asymmetric Dynamics of Crossing a Doorway to the Untrodden.

Authors:  Shay Cohen; Yoav Benjamini; Ilan Golani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Adolescent social defeat decreases spatial working memory performance in adulthood.

Authors:  Andrew M Novick; Leah C Miiller; Gina L Forster; Michael J Watt
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.759

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.