Literature DB >> 1641129

Muscarinic M2 receptor mRNA expression and receptor binding in cholinergic and non-cholinergic cells in the rat brain: a correlative study using in situ hybridization histochemistry and receptor autoradiography.

M T Vilaró1, K H Wiederhold, J M Palacios, G Mengod.   

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to identify the cells containing mRNA coding for the m2 subtype of muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the rat brain. In situ hybridization histochemistry was used, with oligonucleotides as hybridization probes. The distribution of cholinergic cells was examined in consecutive sections with probes complementary to choline acetyltransferase mRNA. Furthermore, the microscopic distribution of muscarinic cholinergic binding sites was examined with a non-selective ligand ([3H]N-methylscopolamine) and with ligands proposed to be M1-selective ([3H]pirenzepine) or M2-selective ([3H]oxotremorine-M). The majority of choline acetyltransferase mRNA-rich (i.e. cholinergic) cell groups (medial septum-diagonal band complex, nucleus basalis, pedunculopontine and laterodorsal tegmental nuclei, nucleus parabigeminalis, several motor nuclei of the brainstem, motoneurons of the spinal cord), also contained m2 mRNA, strongly suggesting that at least a fraction of these receptors may be presynaptic autoreceptors. A few groups of cholinergic cells were an exception to this fact: the medial habenula and some cranial nerve nuclei (principal oculomotor, trochlear, abducens, dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus). Furthermore, m2 mRNA was not restricted to cholinergic cells but was also present in many other cells throughout the rat brain. The distribution of m2 mRNA was in good, although not complete, agreement with that of binding sites for the M2 preferential agonist [3H]oxotremorine-M, but not with [3H]pirenzepine binding sites. Regions where the presence of [3H]oxotremorine-M binding sites was not correlated with that of m2 mRNA are the caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens, olfactory tubercle and islands of Calleja. The present results strongly suggest that the M2 receptor is expressed by a majority of cholinergic cells, where it probably plays a role as autoreceptor. However, many non-cholinergic neurons also express this receptor, which would be, presumably, postsynaptically located. Finally, comparison between the distribution of m2 mRNA and that of the proposed M2-selective ligand [3H]oxotremorine-M indicates that this ligand, in addition to M2 receptors, may also recognize in certain brain areas other muscarinic receptor populations, particularly M4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1641129     DOI: 10.1016/0306-4522(92)90253-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  34 in total

1.  Ethanol and vestibular stimulation reveal simple and complex aspects of cerebellar heterogeneity.

Authors:  Leonard M Eisenman
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Classifying neuronal subclasses of the cerebellum through constellation pharmacology.

Authors:  Kigen J Curtice; Lee S Leavitt; Kevin Chase; Shrinivasan Raghuraman; Martin P Horvath; Baldomero M Olivera; Russell W Teichert
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the nucleus accumbens core and shell contribute to cocaine priming-induced reinstatement of drug seeking.

Authors:  Judy Yee; Katie R Famous; Thomas J Hopkins; Michael C McMullen; R Christopher Pierce; Heath D Schmidt
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.432

4.  Distribution of 5-HT4 receptor mRNA in the rat brain.

Authors:  C Ullmer; P Engels; S Abdel'Al; H Lübbert
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  The role of N-, Q- and R-type Ca2+ channels in feedback inhibition of ACh release from rat basal forebrain neurones.

Authors:  T G Allen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Autoradiographical and immunohistochemical analysis of receptor localization in the central nervous system.

Authors:  J G Chabot; S Kar; R Quirion
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1996-11

7.  Muscarinic receptors mediating depression and long-term potentiation in rat hippocampus.

Authors:  J M Auerbach; M Segal
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Cholinergic interneurons in the dorsal and ventral striatum: anatomical and functional considerations in normal and diseased conditions.

Authors:  Kalynda K Gonzales; Yoland Smith
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Knockouts reveal overlapping functions of M(2) and M(4) muscarinic receptors and evidence for a local glutamatergic circuit within the laterodorsal tegmental nucleus.

Authors:  Kristi A Kohlmeier; Masaru Ishibashi; Jürgen Wess; Martha E Bickford; Christopher S Leonard
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Acetylcholine from the mesopontine tegmental nuclei differentially affects methamphetamine induced locomotor activity and neurotransmitter levels in the mesolimbic pathway.

Authors:  Lauren K Dobbs; Gregory P Mark
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.