Literature DB >> 19495815

Peri-implant bone reactions around immediately loaded conical implants with different prosthetic suprastructures: histological and histomorphometrical study on minipigs.

Bartolomeo Assenza1, Antonio Scarano, Vittoria Perrotti, Iole Vozza, Alessandro Quaranta, Manlio Quaranta, Adriano Piattelli, Giovanna Iezzi.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate peri-implant bone reactions around immediately loaded conical implants with metal and acrylic resin prosthetic restorations. Five splinted conical implants were inserted in each hemimandible of six minipigs at the alveolar crest level. Ten implants were inserted in each minipig. All the implants were immediately loaded. The implants were divided into a group with an acrylic resin prosthetic restoration and into another group with a metal prosthetic restoration. No postoperative complications or deaths of the minipigs occurred. All minipigs were killed after 3 months. No implant was lost. A total of 60 implants were retrieved and processed to obtain thin ground sections. Histology and histomorphometry showed the presence of compact, mature bone around all the implants. Bone was in close contact with the implant surface starting from the first or second implant threads. A high quantity of mineralized bone was present around immediately loaded conical, root form implants. No differences in the peri-implant bone response were found in the groups with different prosthetic reconstructions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19495815     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-009-0289-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  37 in total

1.  [Effect of implant geometry on strain distribution in peri-implant bone].

Authors:  U Joos; D Vollmer; J Kleinheinz
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2000-05

2.  Good occlusal practice in removable prosthodontics.

Authors:  S J Davies; R M Gray; J F McCord
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2001-11-10       Impact factor: 1.626

3.  Histologic and histomorphometric evaluation of peri-implant bone subjected to immediate loading: an experimental study with Macaca fascicularis.

Authors:  George E Romanos; Chooi Gait Toh; Chong Huat Siar; Dasan Swaminathan
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  In vivo registration of force development with ceramic and acrylic resin occlusal materials on implant-supported prostheses.

Authors:  Roger Bassit; Håkan Lindström; Bo Rangert
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  The influence of occlusal surface material on peak masticatory forces using osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses.

Authors:  J A Hobkirk; K J Psarros
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Primary stability of a conical implant and a hybrid, cylindric screw-type implant in vitro.

Authors:  Jun Sakoh; Ulrich Wahlmann; Elmar Stender; Rer Nat; Bilal Al-Nawas; Wilfried Wagner
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.

Authors:  Sergio E T Quaresma; Patricia R Cury; Wilson R Sendyk; Claudio Sendyk
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Influence of initial implant mobility on the integration of titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  C J Ivanoff; L Sennerby; U Lekholm
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.977

9.  Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; P I Brånemark; H A Hansson; J Lindström
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1981

10.  The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. part 4: a histologic study in monkeys.

Authors:  Takashi Miyata; Yukinao Kobayashi; Hisao Araki; Takaichi Ohto; Kitetsu Shin
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

View more
  3 in total

1.  Twist removal of healed vs. nonhealed implants-a mechanical and histological study in mini pigs.

Authors:  Ricardo de Oliveira Silva; Fabrício Passador; Paulo Henrique Ferreira Caria
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2016-11-25

2.  Is maxillary diastema an appropriate site for implantation in rats?

Authors:  Gang Yue; Husham Edani; Andrew Sullivan; Shuying Jiang; Hamed Kazerani; Mohammad Ali Saghiri
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2020-02-26

3.  The minipig intraoral dental implant model: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marta Liliana Musskopf; Amanda Finger Stadler; Ulf Me Wikesjö; Cristiano Susin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.