Literature DB >> 18390236

A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.

Sergio E T Quaresma1, Patricia R Cury, Wilson R Sendyk, Claudio Sendyk.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the influence of 2 commercially available dental implant systems on stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting alveolar bone under simulated occlusal forces, employing a finite element analysis. The implants and abutments evaluated consisted of a stepped cylinder implant connected to a screw-retained, internal, hexagonal abutment (system 1) and a conical implant connected to a solid, internal, conical abutment (system 2). A porcelain-covered, silver-palladium alloy was used as a crown. In each case, a simulated, 100-N vertical load was applied to the buccal cusp. A finite element model was created based on the physical properties of each component, and the values of the von Mises stresses generated in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting alveolar bone were calculated. In the prostheses, the maximum von Mises stresses were concentrated at the points of load application in both systems, and they were greater in system 1 (148 N/mm2) than in system 2 (55 N/mm2). Stress was greater on the abutment of system 2 than of system 1 on both the buccal (342 N/mm2 x 294 N/mm2) and lingual (294 N/mm2 x 148 N/ mm2) faces. Stress in the cortical, alveolar bone crest was greater in system 1 than in system 2 (buccal: 99.5 N/mm2 x 55 N/mm2, lingual: 55 N/mm2 x 24.5 N/mm2, respectively). Within the limits of this investigation, the stepped cylinder implant connected to a screw-retained, internal hexagonal abutment produces greater stresses on the alveolar bone and prosthesis and lower stresses on the abutment complex. In contrast, the conical implant connected to a solid, internal, conical abutment furnishes lower stresses on the alveolar bone and prosthesis and greater stresses on the abutment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18390236     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2008)34[1:AFEAOT]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  16 in total

1.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of platform switched implant.

Authors:  Se-Young Moon; Young-Jun Lim; Myung-Joo Kim; Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 2.  Implant-abutment connections on single crowns: a systematic review.

Authors:  F M Ceruso; P Barnaba; S Mazzoleni; L Ottria; M Gargari; A Zuccon; G Bruno; A DI Fiore
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-01-21

3.  A Finite Element Stress Analysis of a Concical Triangular Connection in Implants: A New Proposal.

Authors:  Romy Angeles Maslucan; John Alexis Dominguez
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Peri-implant bone reactions around immediately loaded conical implants with different prosthetic suprastructures: histological and histomorphometrical study on minipigs.

Authors:  Bartolomeo Assenza; Antonio Scarano; Vittoria Perrotti; Iole Vozza; Alessandro Quaranta; Manlio Quaranta; Adriano Piattelli; Giovanna Iezzi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of a passive and friction fit implant abutment interface and the influence of occlusal table dimension on the stress distribution pattern on the implant and surrounding bone.

Authors:  Hasan Sarfaraz; Anoopa Paulose; K Kamalakanth Shenoy; Akhter Hussain
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

6.  Characteristics of the tooth in the initial movement: the influence of the restraint site to the periodontal ligament and the alveolar bone.

Authors:  Kyoko Shinya; Akikazu Shinya; Rizako Nakahara; Yuji Nakasone; Akiyoshi Shinya
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2009-05-15

7.  Effects of Implant-Abutment Connection Type and Inter-Implant Distance on Inter-Implant Bone Stress and Microgap: Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.

Authors:  Takashi Matsuoka; Tamaki Nakano; Satoshi Yamaguchi; Shinji Ono; Shota Watanabe; Takumi Sato; Hirofumi Yatani
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  A three-dimensional finite element study on the stress distribution pattern of two prosthetic abutments for external hexagon implants.

Authors:  Wagner Moreira; Caio Hermann; Jucélio Tomás Pereira; Jean Anacleto Balbinoti; Rodrigo Tiossi
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2013-10

9.  Narrow-diameter implants with conical connection for restoring the posterior edentulous region.

Authors:  In-Hee Woo; Ju-Won Kim; So-Young Kang; Young-Hee Kim; Byoung-Eun Yang
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-08-05

10.  Long-term cumulative survival and mechanical complications of single-tooth Ankylos Implants: focus on the abutment neck fractures.

Authors:  Hye Won Shim; Byoung-Eun Yang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.