Literature DB >> 10512657

Predicting flock vigilance from simple passerine interactions: modelling with cellular automata.

.   

Abstract

Vigilance in flocks can be described and modelled as a plausible set of local interactions between neighbouring birds. Each bird in the modelled flock chooses to feed or to scan based solely on whether or not its neighbours are feeding or scanning. This simple model has the ability both to reproduce observations that have not been previously explained and to predict flock behaviours that might be confirmed with future field studies. Examples include simulations showing decreased vigilance with increased flock size (as observed in the field), greater time spent scanning when obstacles such as trees are present (as observed) and a coordinated feed/scan pattern (that is predicted to become increasingly coordinated when the birds look up from feeding more frequently). The numerical model also predicts that flock geometry influences vigilance. If two flocks are the same size, individuals in the one with the larger perimeter will spend more time scanning. This prediction could be tested with field studies and already has been observed empirically for two limiting cases: birds arranged in a line (high perimeters, high scan times) and birds in a circle (lower perimeters, lower scan times). As demonstrated by its multiple successes, cellular models of this type are a powerful new approach to understanding bird flock behaviours. Copyright 1999 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Year:  1999        PMID: 10512657     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  7 in total

1.  Evolutionary stability of vigilance coordination among social foragers.

Authors:  Miguel A Rodríguez-Gironés; Rodrigo A Vásquez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  New perspectives in gaze sensitivity research.

Authors:  Gabrielle L Davidson; Nicola S Clayton
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Prey synchronize their vigilant behaviour with other group members.

Authors:  Olivier Pays; Pierre-Cyril Renaud; Patrice Loisel; Maud Petit; Jean-François Gerard; Peter J Jarman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The value of constant surveillance in a risky environment.

Authors:  M B V Bell; A N Radford; R Rose; H M Wade; A R Ridley
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Sleeping gulls monitor the vigilance behaviour of their neighbours.

Authors:  Guy Beauchamp
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Responses of a top and a meso predator and their prey to moon phases.

Authors:  Vincenzo Penteriani; Anna Kuparinen; Maria del Mar Delgado; Francisco Palomares; José Vicente López-Bao; José María Fedriani; Javier Calzada; Sacramento Moreno; Rafael Villafuerte; Letizia Campioni; Rui Lourenço
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  How group size affects vigilance dynamics and time allocation patterns: the key role of imitation and tempo.

Authors:  Pablo Michelena; Jean-Louis Deneubourg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.