Literature DB >> 1949351

Single strand breaks in CHO cell DNA induced by ultrasonic cavitation in vitro.

D L Miller1, R M Thomas, M E Frazier.   

Abstract

Ultrasonic cavitation induces a multiplicity of bioeffects in cell suspensions exposed in a 72 RPM rotating-tube exposure system. Single strand DNA breaks (SSBs) were found in cultured Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells exposed directly to 1.61 MHz ultrasound at a continuous 8 W/cm2 spatial peak temporal average (SPTA) intensity with cavitation for 10 min at 2 degrees C. Viability assessed by the trypan blue test was less than 1%, which indicates that these SSBs were in dead cells. Burst mode exposure with 10.5 microseconds bursts repeated each 21 microseconds not only caused SSBs at 5.6 W/cm2 and 8 W/cm2 (SPTA) for 10 min, but also allowed 20% and 7% viability, respectively. In order to determine if any of these breaks resided in the viable fraction of cells, the exposures were repeated with a 30 min postexposure incubation period at 37 degrees C to allow breaks in viable cells to repair. No significant repair occurred, relative to the samples which remained at 2 degrees C to prevent repair. A similar result was obtained with 10.5 microseconds bursts repeated each 42 microseconds at 4 W/cm2 (SPTA) with 46% viability. Thus, the observed ultrasonically induced SSBs reside primarily in the nonviable fraction of cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1949351     DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(91)90140-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  9 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Lessons to be learned: how a comprehensive neurobiological framework of atypical reading development can inform educational practice.

Authors:  Ola Ozernov-Palchik; Xi Yu; Yingying Wang; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-05-19

6.  Distinct sensitivity of normal and malignant cells to ultrasound in vitro.

Authors:  F Lejbkowicz; S Salzberg
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Containerless Bioorganic Reactions in a Floating Droplet by Levitation Technique Using an Ultrasonic Wave.

Authors:  Teruhiko Matsubara; Kenjiro Takemura
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 8.  Landscape of Cellular Bioeffects Triggered by Ultrasound-Induced Sonoporation.

Authors:  Dawid Przystupski; Marek Ussowicz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  In vivo effects of cavitation alone or in combination with chemotherapy in a peritoneal carcinomatosis in the rat.

Authors:  F Prat; J Y Chapelon; F A el Fadil; Y Theillère; T Ponchon; D Cathignol
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.