Literature DB >> 19487758

Intent to remember briefly presented human faces and other pictorial stimuli enhances recognition memory.

Richard A Block1.   

Abstract

Since the early days of psychology, researchers have investigated whether or not intending to remember information affects subsequent memory performance. The literature contains methodological issues and empirical contradictions, with ambiguous effects. In five experiments, a total of 576 participants viewed a rapid series of pictorial stimuli under either incidental- or intentional-memory conditions. Although the methodology was stringent, intent to remember consistently enhanced recognition memory. Recognition was enhanced even when participants viewed a picture of a human face, of an ape face, or of a bird for as little as 0.5-1.0 sec, with no interstimulus interval between it and the next picture. Rehearsal, depth of processing, and attentional allocation are discussed to explain how people might intentionally encode pictorial information to enhance their subsequent recognition memory performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19487758     DOI: 10.3758/MC.37.5.667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  21 in total

Review 1.  The development of face expertise.

Authors:  I Gauthier; C A Nelson
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Featural vs. configurational information in faces: a conceptual and empirical analysis.

Authors:  Sam S Rakover
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2002-02

3.  Studies in incidental learning: I. The effects of crowding and isolation.

Authors:  L POSTMAN; L W PHILLIPS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1954-07

4.  Is face recognition not so unique after all?

Authors:  I Gauthier; N K Logothetis
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 5.  Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact.

Authors:  Romina Palermo; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

7.  Domain specificity versus expertise: factors influencing distinct processing of faces.

Authors:  David Carmel; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-02

Review 8.  What is "special" about face perception?

Authors:  M J Farah; K D Wilson; M Drain; J N Tanaka
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.

Authors:  J G Snodgrass; J Corwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1988-03

10.  Rehearsal and storage of visual information.

Authors:  W O Shaffer; R M Shiffrin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-02
View more
  4 in total

1.  "Wanted!" the effects of reward on face recognition: electrophysiological correlates.

Authors:  Francesco Marini; Tessa Marzi; Maria P Viggiano
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Visual long-term memory is not unitary: Flexible storage of visual information as features or objects as a function of affect.

Authors:  Philipp Spachtholz; Christof Kuhbandner
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Opposing patterns of neural priming in same-exemplar vs. different-exemplar repetition predict subsequent memory.

Authors:  Anna Manelis; Mark E Wheeler; Christopher A Paynter; Lisa Storey; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  The effect of intentionality on verbal memory assessment over days.

Authors:  Renata Kochhann; Bárbara Costa Beber; Patrícia Ferreira; Maila Rossato Holz; Rafael Ruschel; Analuiza Camozzato de Pádua; Cláudia da Cunha Godinho; Iván Izquierdo; Márcia Lorena Fagundes Chaves
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2020-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.