Literature DB >> 28924746

Visual long-term memory is not unitary: Flexible storage of visual information as features or objects as a function of affect.

Philipp Spachtholz1, Christof Kuhbandner2.   

Abstract

Research has shown that observers store surprisingly highly detailed long-term memory representations of visual objects after only a single viewing. However, the nature of these representations is currently not well understood. In particular, it may be that the nature of such memory representations is not unitary but reflects the flexible operating of two separate memory subsystems: a feature-based subsystem that stores visual experiences in the form of independent features, and an object-based subsystem that stores visual experiences in the form of coherent objects. Such an assumption is usually difficult to test, because overt memory responses reflect the joint output of both systems. Therefore, to disentangle the two systems, we (1) manipulated the affective state of observers (negative vs. positive) during initial object perception, to introduce systematic variance in the way that visual experiences are stored, and (2) measured both the electrophysiological activity at encoding (via electroencephalography) and later feature memory performance for the objects. The results showed that the nature of stored memory representations varied qualitatively as a function of affective state. Negative affect promoted the independent storage of object features, driven by preattentive brain activities (feature-based memory representations), whereas positive affect promoted the dependent storage of object features, driven by attention-related brain activities (object-based memory representations). Taken together, these findings suggest that visual long-term memory is not a unitary phenomenon. Instead, incoming information can be stored flexibly by means of two qualitatively different long-term memory subsystems, based on the requirements of the current situation.

Keywords:  EEG; Emotions; Memory representations; Subsequent memory effect; Visual long-term memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28924746     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-017-0538-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  35 in total

1.  Change detection.

Authors:  Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  How emotions inform judgment and regulate thought.

Authors:  Gerald L Clore; Jeffrey R Huntsinger
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Implicit and explicit memory for visual patterns.

Authors:  G Musen; A Treisman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science.

Authors:  Andy Clark
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  Neural correlates of encoding in an incidental learning paradigm.

Authors:  K A Paller; M Kutas; A R Mayes
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1987-10

7.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Affect influences feature binding in memory: Trading between richness and strength of memory representations.

Authors:  Philipp Spachtholz; Christof Kuhbandner; Reinhard Pekrun
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2016-06-23

9.  FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data.

Authors:  Robert Oostenveld; Pascal Fries; Eric Maris; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-23

10.  Brain networks supporting perceptual grouping and contour selection.

Authors:  Gregor Volberg; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-04
View more
  3 in total

1.  Real-World Objects Are Represented in Visual Long-Term Memory Both as Unbound Features and as Bound Objects.

Authors:  Christof Kuhbandner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-12-07

2.  Real-world objects are not stored in holistic representations in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yuri A Markov; Igor S Utochkin; Timothy F Brady
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  High-Fidelity Visual Long-Term Memory within an Unattended Blink of an Eye.

Authors:  Christof Kuhbandner; Elizabeth A Rosas-Corona; Philipp Spachtholz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.