Literature DB >> 19486666

Transmembrane helix association affinity can be modulated by flanking and noninterfacial residues.

Jinming Zhang1, Themis Lazaridis.   

Abstract

The GxxxG sequence motif mediates the association of transmembrane (TM) helices by providing a site of close contact between them. However, it is not sufficient for strong association. For example, both bacteriophage M13 major coat protein (MCP) and human erythrocyte protein glycophorin A (GpA) contain a GxxxG motif in their TM domains and form a homodimer, but the association affinity of MCP, measured by the ToxCAT in vivo assay, is dramatically weaker than that of GpA. Even when all interfacial residues of MCP were substituted for those of GpA (MCP-GpA), association remained significantly weaker than in GpA. Here we provide an explanation for these experimental observations using molecular dynamics simulations in an implicit membrane (IMM1-GC). The association free energies of GpA29 (GpA with 29 residues all from the wild-type sequence), GpA15p11 (GpA with 15 residues from the wild-type sequence plus 11 flanking residues from the ToxCAT construct), MCP, and MCP-GpA TM helices were calculated and compared. MCP and MCP-GpA have the same flanking residues used in the ToxCAT assay as those in GpA15p11, but the position of the flanking residues relative to the GxxxG motif is different. The calculated association free energies follow experimental observations: the association affinity of MCP-GpA falls between those of GpA15p11 and MCP wild-type. MCP exhibits an equally strong interhelical interaction in the TM domain. A major reason for the weaker association of MCP in the calculations was the noninterfacial residue Lys-40, which in the dimer structure is forced to be buried in the membrane interior. To alleviate the desolvation cost, in MCP and MCP-GpA dimers, Lys-40 gets deprotonated. A second factor that modulates association affinity is the flanking residues. Thanks to them, GpA15p11 exhibits a much stronger association affinity than GpA29. The positioning of the flanking residues is also important, as evidenced by the difference in association affinity between MCP and MCP-GpA on one hand and GpA15p11 on the other. Thus, residues outside the contact interface can exert a significant influence on transmembrane helix association affinity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19486666      PMCID: PMC2711494          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  55 in total

1.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution.

Authors:  T Lazaridis; M Karplus
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-05-01

2.  The effect of interactions involving ionizable residues flanking membrane-inserted hydrophobic helices upon helix-helix interaction.

Authors:  Scott Lew; Gregory A Caputo; Erwin London
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Membrane-bound conformation of M13 major coat protein: a structure validation through FRET-derived constraints.

Authors:  Werner L Vos; Rob B M Koehorst; Ruud B Spruijt; Marcus A Hemminga
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Energetics of the native and non-native states of the glycophorin transmembrane helix dimer.

Authors:  Madhusoodanan Mottamal; Jinming Zhang; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-03-01

5.  The contribution of C alpha-H...O hydrogen bonds to membrane protein stability depends on the position of the amide.

Authors:  Madhusoodanan Mottamal; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  TOXCAT: a measure of transmembrane helix association in a biological membrane.

Authors:  W P Russ; D M Engelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The role of anionic lipids in protein insertion and translocation in bacterial membranes.

Authors:  W van Klompenburg; B de Kruijff
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1998-03-01       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  Interface connections of a transmembrane voltage sensor.

Authors:  J Alfredo Freites; Douglas J Tobias; Gunnar von Heijne; Stephen H White
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Transmembrane glycine zippers: physiological and pathological roles in membrane proteins.

Authors:  Sanguk Kim; Tae-Joon Jeon; Amit Oberai; Duan Yang; Jacob J Schmidt; James U Bowie
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Implicit solvent simulations of peptide interactions with anionic lipid membranes.

Authors:  Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-02-15
View more
  13 in total

1.  GxxxG motifs, phenylalanine, and cholesterol guide the self-association of transmembrane domains of ErbB2 receptors.

Authors:  Anupam Prakash; Lorant Janosi; Manolis Doxastakis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Structure elucidation of dimeric transmembrane domains of bitopic proteins.

Authors:  Eduard V Bocharov; Pavel E Volynsky; Konstantin V Pavlov; Roman G Efremov; Alexander S Arseniev
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Single-spanning transmembrane domains in cell growth and cell-cell interactions: More than meets the eye?

Authors:  Pierre Hubert; Paul Sawma; Jean-Pierre Duneau; Jonathan Khao; Jérôme Hénin; Dominique Bagnard; James Sturgis
Journal:  Cell Adh Migr       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Interactions between ionizable amino acid side chains at a lipid bilayer-water interface.

Authors:  Olga Yuzlenko; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 2.991

5.  What ATP binding does to the Ca2+ pump and how nonproductive phosphoryl transfer is prevented in the absence of Ca2.

Authors:  Yoshiki Kabashima; Haruo Ogawa; Rie Nakajima; Chikashi Toyoshima
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A putative transmembrane leucine zipper of agrobacterium VirB10 is essential for t-pilus biogenesis but not type IV secretion.

Authors:  Isaac Garza; Peter J Christie
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  A thermodynamic approach to alamethicin pore formation.

Authors:  Asif Rahaman; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-09-23

8.  Self-association of models of transmembrane domains of ErbB receptors in a lipid bilayer.

Authors:  Anupam Prakash; Lorant Janosi; Manolis Doxastakis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Prediction, refinement, and persistency of transmembrane helix dimers in lipid bilayers using implicit and explicit solvent/lipid representations: microsecond molecular dynamics simulations of ErbB1/B2 and EphA1.

Authors:  Liqun Zhang; Alexander J Sodt; Richard M Venable; Richard W Pastor; Matthias Buck
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-11-05

10.  Role of Cholesterol in Transmembrane Dimerization of the ErbB2 Growth Factor Receptor.

Authors:  Aiswarya B Pawar; Durba Sengupta
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 1.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.