| Literature DB >> 19484523 |
B Hailer1, U Wolfhard, K J Altmaier, M Wehr.
Abstract
Patients who need an implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator (ICD) often require a cardiac pacemaker (PM) to treat underlying symptomatic bradycardia. In some cases the simultaneous therapy has caused interactions between the systems with defaults on both sides.Four patients with an ICD of the newer generation received a single or dual chamber pacemaker system. In all cases bipolar pacemaker electrodes were used. They were positioned together with the ICD-electrode in the right ventricular apex without regard to the distance between them. In order to exclude possible interference between systems special tests were performed during the operative procedure with respect to the system implanted first. In a follow-up period of 4-14 months all patients had episodes of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation that were terminated successfully. Two patients with a bradycardia related arrhythmia after shock delivery showed a correct pacemaker stimulation. Subsequent to the start of pacemaker therapy improvement in stress capacity could be documented, partly on the basis of echocardiography.Combined ICD and PM therapy can thus be generally regarded as compatible. For AV-sequential pacing at least three electrodes and two aggregates are necessary. The development of an ICD with the option for a dual-chamber stimulation would simplify the therapy, along with a greater acceptance on part of the patients.Entities:
Year: 1997 PMID: 19484523 DOI: 10.1007/BF03042499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol ISSN: 0938-7412