GOALS OF WORK: Family caregivers play an important role in caring for cancer patients, but the impact of caregivers' unmet needs on the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care they deliver and on their workplace performance are less understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 1,662 family caregivers of cancer patients who had died at any of 17 hospitals in Korea during 2004. The caregivers answered a telephone questionnaire about needs that were not met when they delivered terminal cancer care and how those unmet their needs affected their workplace performance; they also answered the Quality Care Questionnaire-End of Life (QCQ-EOL). RESULTS: Compared with caregivers who did not have unmet needs, caregivers who had unmet needs for symptom management, financial support, or community support showed poorer QCQ-EOL scores (P < 0.01). Caregivers who had unmet needs for financial support (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 7.55; 95% confidential interval (CI) 3.80-15.00), psychosocial support (aOR = 6.24; 95% CI 2.95-13.05), symptom management (aOR = 3.21; 95% CI 2.26-4.54), community support (aOR = 3.82; 95% CI 2.38-6.11), or religious support (aOR = 4.55; 95% CI 1.84-11.26) were more likely to experience work limitations. Caregivers of patients receiving conventional hospital care were more likely to have unmet needs for symptom management (aOR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.00-1.47), psychosocial support (aOR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.37-2.88), and religious support (aOR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.08-2.78) than those of patients receiving palliative hospice care. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers' unmet needs negatively affected both the quality of EOL care they delivered and their workplace performance. More investment in caregiver support and public policies that meet caregiver needs are needed, and hospice use should be encouraged.
GOALS OF WORK: Family caregivers play an important role in caring for cancerpatients, but the impact of caregivers' unmet needs on the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care they deliver and on their workplace performance are less understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 1,662 family caregivers of cancerpatients who had died at any of 17 hospitals in Korea during 2004. The caregivers answered a telephone questionnaire about needs that were not met when they delivered terminal cancer care and how those unmet their needs affected their workplace performance; they also answered the Quality Care Questionnaire-End of Life (QCQ-EOL). RESULTS: Compared with caregivers who did not have unmet needs, caregivers who had unmet needs for symptom management, financial support, or community support showed poorer QCQ-EOL scores (P < 0.01). Caregivers who had unmet needs for financial support (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 7.55; 95% confidential interval (CI) 3.80-15.00), psychosocial support (aOR = 6.24; 95% CI 2.95-13.05), symptom management (aOR = 3.21; 95% CI 2.26-4.54), community support (aOR = 3.82; 95% CI 2.38-6.11), or religious support (aOR = 4.55; 95% CI 1.84-11.26) were more likely to experience work limitations. Caregivers of patients receiving conventional hospital care were more likely to have unmet needs for symptom management (aOR = 1.21; 95% CI 1.00-1.47), psychosocial support (aOR = 1.99; 95% CI 1.37-2.88), and religious support (aOR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.08-2.78) than those of patients receiving palliative hospice care. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers' unmet needs negatively affected both the quality of EOL care they delivered and their workplace performance. More investment in caregiver support and public policies that meet caregiver needs are needed, and hospice use should be encouraged.
Authors: Tobias Kurth; Alexander M Walker; Robert J Glynn; K Arnold Chan; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; James M Robins Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-12-21 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: J A Hayman; K M Langa; M U Kabeto; S J Katz; S M DeMonner; M E Chernew; M B Slavin; A M Fendrick Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kui Son Choi; Yoo Mi Chae; Chang Geol Lee; Si-young Kim; Sang-wook Lee; Dae Seog Heo; Jun Suk Kim; Keun Seok Lee; Young Seon Hong; Young Ho Yun Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2005-04-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: K E Covinsky; L Goldman; E F Cook; R Oye; N Desbiens; D Reding; W Fulkerson; A F Connors; J Lynn; R S Phillips Journal: JAMA Date: 1994-12-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eva Grunfeld; Doug Coyle; Timothy Whelan; Jennifer Clinch; Leonard Reyno; Craig C Earle; Andrew Willan; Raymond Viola; Marjorie Coristine; Teresa Janz; Robert Glossop Journal: CMAJ Date: 2004-06-08 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Richard A Taylor; Gabrielle B Rocque; Andres Azuero; Aras Acemgil; Michelle Y Martin; Meka Astin; Deborah Ejem; Elizabeth Kvale; Karen Heaton; Maria Pisu; Edward E Partridge; Marie A Bakitas Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Lee Ellington; Kristin G Cloyes; Jiayun Xu; Lanell Bellury; Patricia H Berry; Maija Reblin; Margaret F Clayton Journal: Palliat Support Care Date: 2017-05-03
Authors: Florien W Boele; Charles W Given; Barbara A Given; Heidi S Donovan; Richard Schulz; Jason M Weimer; Jan Drappatz; Frank S Lieberman; Paula R Sherwood Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Theresa A Hastert; Julie J Ruterbusch; Mrudula Nair; Mirza Ishrat Noor; Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Kendra Schwartz; Tara E Baird; Felicity W K Harper; Hayley Thompson; Ann G Schwartz Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2019-09-07
Authors: Tao Wang; Alex Molassiotis; Jing-Yu Tan; Betty Pui Man Chung; Hou-Qiang Huang Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 3.603