Helmut Schmidt1, Jörn Lötsch. 1. Pharmazentrum frankfurt/ZAFES, Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Theodor Stern Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Abstract
AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic interrelations of pupillary effects of dihydrocodeine by two different analytic approaches. METHODS:Dihydrocodeine plasma concentrations and miotic effects were available from a previous study with 24-h measurements after administration of 60 mg dihydrocodeine to nine healthy young men. Plasma concentration versus time course was described either by a one-compartment model or by linear splines using NONMEM. Dihydrocodeine concentrations at the effect site were obtained by convolution of a first-order transfer function with the function describing the plasma concentration versus time courses, and miotic effects were related to effect-site concentrations by a sigmoidal pharmacodynamic model. RESULTS: Bayesian individual fits of miotic effects were only slightly better with the spline approach than with the compartmental approach (median individual absolute weighted residuals 0.046 versus 0.058, respectively, Wilcoxon test p = 0.008; residual errors of an additive error model 0.0979 versus 0.184, respectively). Both approaches provided similar pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic population parameter values. The transfer half-life between plasma and effect site was 21.1 min (95% CI 11.1-34.7 min) and 19.8 min (95% CI 11.9-34 min) with spline and compartmental approaches, respectively, and miosis occurred with EC50 of 207 or 230 ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION: Two modeling approaches to the miotic effects of dihydrocodeine provided similar transfer half-lives between plasma and effect site, which also agreed with previous independently estimated values obtained from analgesic effects, suggesting that pupil size is a valid biomarker to estimate the value of ke0 for opioid central nervous system (CNS) effects.
RCT Entities:
AIM: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic interrelations of pupillary effects of dihydrocodeine by two different analytic approaches. METHODS:Dihydrocodeine plasma concentrations and miotic effects were available from a previous study with 24-h measurements after administration of 60 mg dihydrocodeine to nine healthy young men. Plasma concentration versus time course was described either by a one-compartment model or by linear splines using NONMEM. Dihydrocodeine concentrations at the effect site were obtained by convolution of a first-order transfer function with the function describing the plasma concentration versus time courses, and miotic effects were related to effect-site concentrations by a sigmoidal pharmacodynamic model. RESULTS: Bayesian individual fits of miotic effects were only slightly better with the spline approach than with the compartmental approach (median individual absolute weighted residuals 0.046 versus 0.058, respectively, Wilcoxon test p = 0.008; residual errors of an additive error model 0.0979 versus 0.184, respectively). Both approaches provided similar pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic population parameter values. The transfer half-life between plasma and effect site was 21.1 min (95% CI 11.1-34.7 min) and 19.8 min (95% CI 11.9-34 min) with spline and compartmental approaches, respectively, and miosis occurred with EC50 of 207 or 230 ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSION: Two modeling approaches to the miotic effects of dihydrocodeine provided similar transfer half-lives between plasma and effect site, which also agreed with previous independently estimated values obtained from analgesic effects, suggesting that pupil size is a valid biomarker to estimate the value of ke0 for opioid central nervous system (CNS) effects.
Authors: U Arvidsson; M Riedl; S Chakrabarti; J H Lee; A H Nakano; R J Dado; H H Loh; P Y Law; M W Wessendorf; R Elde Journal: J Neurosci Date: 1995-05 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: E Sarton; E Olofsen; R Romberg; J den Hartigh; B Kest; D Nieuwenhuijs; A Burm; L Teppema; A Dahan Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: J Roy Robertson; Gillian M Raab; Malcolm Bruce; James S McKenzie; Helen R Storkey; Amy Salter Journal: Addiction Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Nicolás Marco-Ariño; Sergio Vide; Mercè Agustí; Andrew Chen; Sebastián Jaramillo; Itziar Irurzun-Arana; Adrià Pacheco; Carmen Gonzalez; Erik W Jensen; Patricia Capsi-Morales; José F Valencia; Iñaki F Troconiz; Pedro L Gambus; Merlin D Larson Journal: CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol Date: 2021-11-18