Literature DB >> 19482842

Radiation dose exposure of computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison of dual-source, 16-slice and 64-slice CT.

J Rixe1, G Conradi, A Rolf, A Schmermund, A Magedanz, D Erkapic, A Deetjen, C W Hamm, T Dill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dual-source CT (DSCT) promises a significant reduction of radiation dose exposure for coronary CT angiography (CTA). Large studies on radiation dose estimates are rare.
OBJECTIVE: To compare radiation dose estimates of DSCT with 16- and 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) for non-invasive coronary angiography. PATIENTS AND
DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis was performed on 292 patients: 56 patients were examined with 16-slice MDCT, 38 patients with 64-slice MDCT and 202 patients using DSCT. The effective dose (ED) estimates were calculated for all patients from the dose-length product and the conversion factor k (0.017 mSv/mGy/cm), as recommended by current guidelines.
RESULTS: The mean (SD) ED for patients examined by 16-slice MDCT was 9.8 (1.8) mSv, for 64-slice MDCT 8.6 (2.8) mSv and for DSCT 11.4 (7.2) mSv. With a protocol of 100 kV tube voltage and 110 ms ECG pulsing window the mean (SD) ED was 3.8 (1.7) mSv for DSCT scanning. When DSCT with a tube voltage of 100 kV was used, a significant inverse correlation between heart rate and radiation dose exposure was found.
CONCLUSIONS: When standard protocols for coronary CTA with 16-, 64-slice MDCT and DSCT scanners are used, the radiation dose is still high. However, using optimised and individually adjusted protocols low estimated radiation doses can be achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19482842     DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2008.161018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  10 in total

Review 1.  Low-dose cardiovascular computed tomography: where are the limits?

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Carla M Thompson; Sandra S Halliburton
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Dose levels at coronary CT angiography--a comparison of Dual Energy-, Dual Source- and 16-slice CT.

Authors:  J Matthias Kerl; Ralf W Bauer; Tobias B Maurer; Rene Aschenbach; Huedayi Korkusuz; Thomas Lehnert; Simon Deseive; Hanns Ackermann; Thomas J Vogl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Comparison of radiation dose and image quality: 320-MDCT versus 64-MDCT coronary angiography.

Authors:  Atif Khan; Faisal Khosa; Khurram Nasir; Aya Yassin; Melvin E Clouse
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Radiation dose optimisation in dynamic volume CT of the heart: tube current adaptation based on anterior-posterior chest diameter.

Authors:  Patrik Rogalla; Jörg Blobel; Sonja Kandel; Henning Meyer; Jürgen Mews; Christian Kloeters; Hany Kashani; Alexander Lembcke; Narinder Paul
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Accuracy of dual-source CT to identify significant coronary artery disease in patients with uncontrolled hypertension presenting with chest pain: comparison with coronary angiography.

Authors:  Mohamed Marwan; Tobias Pflederer; Tiziano Schepis; Martin Seltmann; Lutz Klinghammer; Gerd Muschiol; Dieter Ropers; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Image quality and dose performance of 80 kV low dose scan protocol in high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography: feasibility study.

Authors:  Dan Wang; Xiu-hua Hu; Shi-zheng Zhang; Run-ze Wu; Su-su Xie; Bin Chen; Qiao-wei Zhang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Characteristics of coronary artery disease in symptomatic type 2 diabetic patients: evaluation with CT angiography.

Authors:  Zhi-gang Chu; Zhi-gang Yang; Zhi-hui Dong; Zhi-yu Zhu; Li-qing Peng; Heng Shao; Ci He; Wen Deng; Si-shi Tang; Jing Chen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 9.951

8.  Cancerogenesis Risks between 64 and 320 Row Detector CT for Coronary CTA Screening.

Authors:  Atif N Khan; Faisal Khosa; Boris Nikolic; Waqas Shuaib; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; Mohammad K Khan
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2014-04-29

9.  A comparison study of radiation effective dose in ECG-Gated Coronary CT Angiography and calcium scoring examinations performed with a dual-source CT scanner.

Authors:  Akmal Sabarudin; Tiong Wei Siong; Ang Wee Chin; Ng Kwan Hoong; Muhammad Khalis Abdul Karim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Assessment of Radiation doses to Paediatric Patients in Computed Tomography Procedures.

Authors:  Khalid Alzimami
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.