Literature DB >> 19477962

Hemispheric competence for auditory spatial representation.

Lucas Spierer1, Anne Bellmann-Thiran, Philippe Maeder, Micah M Murray, Stephanie Clarke.   

Abstract

Sound localization relies on the analysis of interaural time and intensity differences, as well as attenuation patterns by the outer ear. We investigated the relative contributions of interaural time and intensity difference cues to sound localization by testing 60 healthy subjects: 25 with focal left and 25 with focal right hemispheric brain damage. Group and single-case behavioural analyses, as well as anatomo-clinical correlations, confirmed that deficits were more frequent and much more severe after right than left hemispheric lesions and for the processing of interaural time than intensity difference cues. For spatial processing based on interaural time difference cues, different error types were evident in the individual data. Deficits in discriminating between neighbouring positions occurred in both hemispaces after focal right hemispheric brain damage, but were restricted to the contralesional hemispace after focal left hemispheric brain damage. Alloacusis (perceptual shifts across the midline) occurred only after focal right hemispheric brain damage and was associated with minor or severe deficits in position discrimination. During spatial processing based on interaural intensity cues, deficits were less severe in the right hemispheric brain damage than left hemispheric brain damage group and no alloacusis occurred. These results, matched to anatomical data, suggest the existence of a binaural sound localization system predominantly based on interaural time difference cues and primarily supported by the right hemisphere. More generally, our data suggest that two distinct mechanisms contribute to: (i) the precise computation of spatial coordinates allowing spatial comparison within the contralateral hemispace for the left hemisphere and the whole space for the right hemisphere; and (ii) the building up of global auditory spatial representations in right temporo-parietal cortices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19477962     DOI: 10.1093/brain/awp127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  31 in total

1.  Neural time course of visually enhanced echo suppression.

Authors:  Christopher W Bishop; Sam London; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  An expanded role for the dorsal auditory pathway in sensorimotor control and integration.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Widespread and Opponent fMRI Signals Represent Sound Location in Macaque Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Michael Ortiz-Rios; Frederico A C Azevedo; Paweł Kuśmierek; Dávid Z Balla; Matthias H Munk; Georgios A Keliris; Nikos K Logothetis; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 4.  Where, When, and How: Are they all sensorimotor? Towards a unified view of the dorsal pathway in vision and audition.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  An event-related FMRI study of exogenous orienting across vision and audition.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Evoked and intrinsic asymmetries during auditory attention: implications for the contralateral and neglect models of functioning.

Authors:  Terri M Teshiba; Josef Ling; David A Ruhl; Bronwyn S Bedrick; Amanda Peña; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Joint Representation of Spatial and Phonetic Features in the Human Core Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Prachi Patel; Laura K Long; Jose L Herrero; Ashesh D Mehta; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 9.423

8.  Tuning to Binaural Cues in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Susan A McLaughlin; Nathan C Higgins; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

9.  Evidence for cue-independent spatial representation in the human auditory cortex during active listening.

Authors:  Nathan C Higgins; Susan A McLaughlin; Teemu Rinne; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Evidence for opponent process analysis of sound source location in humans.

Authors:  Paul M Briley; Pádraig T Kitterick; A Quentin Summerfield
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.