Literature DB >> 26872810

Endoscopic scene labelling and augmentation using intraoperative pulsatile motion and colour appearance cues with preoperative anatomical priors.

Masoud S Nosrati1, Alborz Amir-Khalili2, Jean-Marc Peyrat3, Julien Abinahed3, Osama Al-Alao4, Abdulla Al-Ansari4, Rafeef Abugharbieh2, Ghassan Hamarneh5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite great advances in medical image segmentation, the accurate and automatic segmentation of endoscopic scenes remains a challenging problem. Two important aspects have to be considered in segmenting an endoscopic scene: (1) noise and clutter due to light reflection and smoke from cutting tissue, and (2) structure occlusion (e.g. vessels occluded by fat, or endophytic tumours occluded by healthy kidney tissue).
METHODS: In this paper, we propose a variational technique to augment a surgeon's endoscopic view by segmenting visible as well as occluded structures in the intraoperative endoscopic view. Our method estimates the 3D pose and deformation of anatomical structures segmented from 3D preoperative data in order to align to and segment corresponding structures in 2D intraoperative endoscopic views. Our preoperative to intraoperative alignment is driven by, first, spatio-temporal, signal processing based vessel pulsation cues and, second, machine learning based analysis of colour and textural visual cues. To our knowledge, this is the first work that utilizes vascular pulsation cues for guiding preoperative to intraoperative registration. In addition, we incorporate a tissue-specific (i.e. heterogeneous) physically based deformation model into our framework to cope with the non-rigid deformation of structures that occurs during the intervention.
RESULTS: We validated the utility of our technique on fifteen challenging clinical cases with 45 % improvements in accuracy compared to the state-of-the-art method.
CONCLUSIONS: A new technique for localizing both visible and occluded structures in an endoscopic view was proposed and tested. This method leverages both preoperative data, as a source of patient-specific prior knowledge, as well as vasculature pulsation and endoscopic visual cues in order to accurately segment the highly noisy and cluttered environment of an endoscopic video. Our results on in vivo clinical cases of partial nephrectomy illustrate the potential of the proposed framework for augmented reality applications in minimally invasive surgeries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D pose estimation; Endoscopy; Image-guided surgery; Kidney; Occluded vessels; Partial nephrectomy; Patient-specific model; Robotic surgery; Segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26872810     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1331-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  20 in total

1.  Automatic region-of-interest segmentation and pathology detection in magnetically guided capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Philip W Mewes; Dominik Neumann; Oleg Licegevic; Johannes Simon; Aleksandar L Juloski; Elli Angelopoulou
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2011

2.  Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  B Escudier; V Kataja
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Visual enhancement of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with 3-charge coupled device camera: assessing intraoperative tissue perfusion and vascular anatomy by visible hemoglobin spectral response.

Authors:  Nicole J Crane; Suzanne M Gillern; Kambiz Tajkarimi; Ira W Levin; Peter A Pinto; Eric A Elster
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Active contours without edges.

Authors:  T F Chan; L A Vese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 10.856

5.  Variational image segmentation for endoscopic human colonic aberrant crypt foci.

Authors:  Isabel N Figueiredo; Pedro N Figueiredo; Georg Stadler; Omar Ghattas; Adérito Araujo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  An effective visualisation and registration system for image-guided robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Philip Pratt; Erik Mayer; Justin Vale; Daniel Cohen; Eddie Edwards; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-01-13

7.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumor: duplicating open surgical techniques.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Mihir M Desai; Jihad H Kaouk; Anoop M Meraney; David P Murphy; Gyung Tak Sung; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  The Generalized Log-Ratio Transformation: Learning Shape and Adjacency Priors for Simultaneous Thigh Muscle Segmentation.

Authors:  Shawn Andrews; Ghassan Hamarneh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Comparison of 1,800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Louis R Kavoussi; Brian R Lane; Michael L Blute; Denise Babineau; J Roberto Colombo; Igor Frank; Sompol Permpongkosol; Christopher J Weight; Jihad H Kaouk; Michael W Kattan; Andrew C Novick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Towards real time 2D to 3D registration for ultrasound-guided endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Raúl San José Estépar; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Kirby G Vosburgh
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.924

View more
  6 in total

1.  Augmented reality in a tumor resection model.

Authors:  Pauline Chauvet; Toby Collins; Clement Debize; Lorraine Novais-Gameiro; Bruno Pereira; Adrien Bartoli; Michel Canis; Nicolas Bourdel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Urological Diseases and Management: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  B M Zeeshan Hameed; Aiswarya V L S Dhavileswarapu; Syed Zahid Raza; Hadis Karimi; Harneet Singh Khanuja; Dasharathraj K Shetty; Sufyan Ibrahim; Milap J Shah; Nithesh Naik; Rahul Paul; Bhavan Prasad Rai; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Evolving robotic surgery training and improving patient safety, with the integration of novel technologies.

Authors:  I-Hsuan Alan Chen; Ahmed Ghazi; Ashwin Sridhar; Danail Stoyanov; Mark Slack; John D Kelly; Justin W Collins
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence for renal cancer: From imaging to histology and beyond.

Authors:  Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Luisa Egen; Chanel E Fischetti; Stefano Puliatti; Gomez Rivas Juan; Mark Taratkin; Rivero Belenchon Ines; Marie Angela Sidoti Abate; Julia Mühlbauer; Frederik Wessels; Enrico Checcucci; Giovanni Cacciamani
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2022-06-18

Review 5.  Machine learning applications to enhance patient specific care for urologic surgery.

Authors:  Patrick W Doyle; Nicholas L Kavoussi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Recent Development of Augmented Reality in Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  P Vávra; J Roman; P Zonča; P Ihnát; M Němec; J Kumar; N Habib; A El-Gendi
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 2.682

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.