Literature DB >> 19474072

Body size differences do not arise from divergent mate preferences in a species pair of threespine stickleback.

Megan L Head1, Emily A Price, Janette W Boughman.   

Abstract

Ecological speciation can be driven by divergent natural and/or sexual selection. The relative contribution of these processes to species divergence, however, is unknown. Here, we investigate how sexual selection in the form of male and female mate preferences contributes to divergence of body size. This trait is known be under divergent natural selection and also contributes to sexual isolation in species pairs of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). We show that neither female nor male size preferences contribute to body size divergence in this species pair, suggesting that size-based sexual isolation arises primarily through natural selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19474072      PMCID: PMC2781927          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  12 in total

1.  Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks.

Authors:  H D Rundle; L Nagel; J Wenrick Boughman; D Schluter
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-01-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks.

Authors:  J W Boughman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  The evolution of premating isolation: local adaptation and natural and sexual selection against hybrids.

Authors:  Maria R Servedio
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Male-male competition and nuptial-colour displacement as a diversifying force in Lake Victoria cichlid fishes.

Authors:  Ole Seehausen; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Parallel evolution of sexual isolation in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Janette Wenrick Boughman; Howard D Rundle; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Experimental evidence that predation promotes divergence in adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil; Bernard J Crespi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.

Authors:  Genevieve M Kozak; Melissa Reisland; Janette W Boughmann
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 8.  Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection.

Authors:  John Hunt; Casper J Breuker; Jennifer A Sadowski; Allen J Moore
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Measuring female mating preferences.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 10.  Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation.

Authors:  Patrik Nosil; Bernard J Crespi; Regine Gries; Gerhard Gries
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 1.082

View more
  7 in total

1.  Predator experience overrides learned aversion to heterospecifics in stickleback species pairs.

Authors:  Genevieve M Kozak; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Male choice in the stream-anadromous stickleback complex.

Authors:  Jeffrey S McKinnon; Nick Hamele; Nicole Frey; Jennifer Chou; Leia McAleavey; Jess Greene; Windi Paulson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Environmental change mediates mate choice for an extended phenotype, but not for mate quality.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Rebecca J Fox; Iain Barber
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  The relationship between male sexual signals, cognitive performance, and mating success in stickleback fish.

Authors:  Ross Minter; Jason Keagy; Robin M Tinghitella
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Genetic basis for body size variation between an anadromous and two derived lacustrine populations of threespine stickleback Gasterosteus aculeatus in southwest Alaska.

Authors:  Ella Bowles; Rebecca A Johnston; Stevi L Vanderzwan; Sean M Rogers
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.624

6.  Female mate preferences for male body size and shape promote sexual isolation in threespine sticklebacks.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Genevieve M Kozak; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Identification of major and minor QTL for ecologically important morphological traits in three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Jun Liu; Takahito Shikano; Tuomas Leinonen; José Manuel Cano; Meng-Hua Li; Juha Merilä
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.154

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.