Literature DB >> 16900317

Natural selection and divergence in mate preference during speciation.

Patrik Nosil1, Bernard J Crespi, Regine Gries, Gerhard Gries.   

Abstract

Sexual isolation can evolve due to natural selection against hybrids (reinforcement). However, many different forms of hybrid dysfunction, and selective processes that do not involve hybrids, can contribute to the evolution of sexual isolation. Here we review how different selective processes affect the evolution of sexual isolation, describe approaches for distinguishing among them, and assess how they contribute to variation in sexual isolation among populations of Timema cristinae stick-insects. Pairs of allopatric populations of T. cristinae living on different host-plant species exhibit greater sexual isolation than those on the same host, indicating that some sexual isolation has evolved due to host adaptation. Sexual isolation is strongest in regions where populations on different hosts are in geographic contact, a pattern of reproductive character displacement that is indicative of reinforcement. Ecological costs to hybridization do occur but traits under ecological selection (predation) do not co-vary strongly with the probability of between-population mating such that selection on ecological traits is not predicted to produce a strong correlated evolutionary response in mate preference. Moreover, F1 hybrid egg inviability is lacking and the factors contributing to reproductive character displacement require further study. Finally, we show that sexual isolation involves, at least in part, olfactory communication. Our results illustrate how understanding of the evolution of sexual isolation can be enhanced by isolating the roles of diverse ecological and evolutionary processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16900317     DOI: 10.1007/s10709-006-0013-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  22 in total

1.  Pedigrees, assortative mating and speciation in Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Body size differences do not arise from divergent mate preferences in a species pair of threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Emily A Price; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 3.  Behavioural reproductive isolation and speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Punita Nanda; Bashisth Narayan Singh
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 4.  Role of sexual selection in speciation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Akanksha Singh; Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Neutral and selection-driven decay of sexual traits in asexual stick insects.

Authors:  Tanja Schwander; Bernard J Crespi; Regine Gries; Gerhard Gries
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sexual selection against natural hybrids may contribute to reinforcement in a house mouse hybrid zone.

Authors:  Yasmin Latour; Marco Perriat-Sanguinet; Pierre Caminade; Pierre Boursot; Carole M Smadja; Guila Ganem
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Adaptive zones shape the magnitude of premating reproductive isolation in Timema stick insects.

Authors:  Moritz Muschick; Víctor Soria-Carrasco; Jeffrey L Feder; Zach Gompert; Patrik Nosil
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Changes of sex pheromone communication systems associated with tebufenozide and abamectin resistance in diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.).

Authors:  Zhen Xu; Guang-Chun Cao; Shuang-Lin Dong
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Ecological character displacement in the face of gene flow: evidence from two species of nightingales.

Authors:  Radka Reifová; Jiří Reif; Marcin Antczak; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Male courtship preferences demonstrate discrimination against allopatric colour morphs in a cichlid fish.

Authors:  P Zoppoth; S Koblmüller; K M Sefc
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.