Literature DB >> 19120810

Male-male competition, female mate choice and their interaction: determining total sexual selection.

John Hunt1, Casper J Breuker, Jennifer A Sadowski, Allen J Moore.   

Abstract

Empirical studies of sexual selection typically focus on one of the two mechanisms of sexual selection without integrating these into a description of total sexual selection, or study total sexual selection without quantifying the contributions of all of the mechanisms of sexual selection. However, this can provide an incomplete or misleading view of how sexually selected traits evolve if the mechanisms of sexual selection are opposing or differ in form. Here, we take a two-fold approach to advocate a direction for future studies of sexual selection. We first show how a quantitative partitioning and examination of sexual selection mechanisms can inform by identifying illustrative studies that describe both male-male competition and female mate choice acting on the same trait. In our sample, the most common trait where this occurred was body size, and selection was typically linear. We found that male-male competition and female mate choice can be reinforcing or opposing, although the former is most common in the literature. The mechanisms of sexual selection can occur simultaneously or sequentially, and we found they were more likely to be opposing when the mechanisms operated sequentially. The degree and timing that these mechanisms interact have important implications for the operation of sexual selection and needs to be considered in designing studies. Our examples highlight where empirical data are needed. We especially lack standardized measures of the form and strength of selection imposed by each mechanism of sexual selection and how they combine to determine total sexual selection. Secondly, using quantitative genetic principles, we outline how the selection imposed by individual mechanisms can be measured and combined to estimate the total strength and form of sexual selection. We discuss the evolutionary consequences of combining the mechanisms of sexual selection and interpreting total sexual selection. We suggest how this approach may result in empirical progress in the field of sexual selection.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19120810     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01633.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  79 in total

1.  Differences in the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection among fitness components in the wild.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Joseph D DiBattista; Jeffrey A Evans; Stephanie M Carlson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Defining individual quality over lifetimes and selective contexts.

Authors:  Simon P Lailvaux; Michael M Kasumovic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Female preference for multi-modal courtship: multiple signals are important for male mating success in peacock spiders.

Authors:  Madeline B Girard; Damian O Elias; Michael M Kasumovic
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Body size differences do not arise from divergent mate preferences in a species pair of threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Megan L Head; Emily A Price; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Is male rhesus macaque facial coloration under intrasexual selection?

Authors:  Megan Petersdorf; Constance Dubuc; Alexander V Georgiev; Sandra Winters; James P Higham
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Who cares? Experimental attention biases provide new insights into a mammalian sexual signal.

Authors:  Constance Dubuc; William L Allen; Julie Cascio; D Susie Lee; Dario Maestripieri; Megan Petersdorf; Sandra Winters; James P Higham
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  Sex roles and sexual selection: lessons from a dynamic model system.

Authors:  Trond Amundsen
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Tactic-dependent plasticity in ejaculate traits in the swordtail Xiphophorus nigrensis.

Authors:  Chad C Smith; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Polyandrous females benefit by producing sons that achieve high reproductive success in a competitive environment.

Authors:  Renée C Firman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Male Scent Gland Signals Mating Status in Greater Spear-Nosed Bats, Phyllostomus hastatus.

Authors:  Danielle M Adams; Yue Li; Gerald S Wilkinson
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.