Literature DB >> 19473778

Effect of translational and rotational errors on complex dose distributions with off-line and on-line position verification.

Irene M Lips1, Uulke A van der Heide, Alexis N T J Kotte, Marco van Vulpen, Arjan Bel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of translational and rotational errors on prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with an integrated boost to the tumor and to evaluate the effect of the use of an on-line correction protocol. METHODS AND MATERIALS: For 19 patients, who had been treated with prostate IMRT and fiducial marker-based position verification, highly inhomogeneous IMRT plans, including an integrated tumor boost, were made using varying margins (2, 4, 6, and 8 mm). The measured translational and rotational errors were used to calculate the dose using two positioning strategies: an off-line and an on-line protocol to correct the translational shifts. The estimated dose to the targets and the organs at risk was compared with the intended dose.
RESULTS: Residual deviations after off-line correction led to statistically significant, but very small, reductions in dose coverage. Even when a 2-mm margin was used, the average reduction in dose to 99% of the volume was 1.4 +/- 1.9 Gy for the tumor, 1.5 +/- 1.5 Gy for the prostate without seminal vesicles (boost volume), and 4.3 +/- 4.6 Gy, including the seminal vesicles (clinical target volume). Patients with large systematic rotational errors demonstrated a substantial decrease in dose, especially for the clinical target volume. If an on-line correction protocol was used, the average mean dose and dose to 99% of the volume of the targets improved. However, the extensive dose reduction for patients with large rotational errors barely recovered with on-line correction.
CONCLUSION: For complex prostate IMRT with an integrated tumor boost, the use of an on-line correction protocol yields little improvement without the correction of rotational errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19473778     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

1.  Dosimetric consequences of rotational errors in radiation therapy of pediatric brain tumor patients.

Authors:  Chris Beltran; Alexander Pegram; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Accuracy of an automatic patient-positioning system based on the correlation of two edge images in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Myonggeun Yoon; Minho Cheong; Jinsung Kim; Dong Ho Shin; Sung Yong Park; Se Byeong Lee
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Dosimetric benefit of DMLC tracking for conventional and sub-volume boosted prostate intensity-modulated arc radiotherapy.

Authors:  Tobias Pommer; Marianne Falk; Per R Poulsen; Paul J Keall; Ricky T O'Brien; Peter Meidahl Petersen; Per Munck af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Target margins in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Slav Yartsev; Glenn Bauman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Six-Dimensional Correction of Intra-Fractional Prostate Motion with CyberKnife Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Siyuan Lei; Nathaniel Piel; Eric K Oermann; Viola Chen; Andrew W Ju; Kedar N Dahal; Heather N Hanscom; Joy S Kim; Xia Yu; Guowei Zhang; Brian T Collins; Reena Jha; Anatoly Dritschilo; Simeng Suy; Sean P Collins
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Single blind randomized phase III trial to investigate the benefit of a focal lesion ablative microboost in prostate cancer (FLAME-trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Irene M Lips; Uulke A van der Heide; Karin Haustermans; Emile N J T van Lin; Floris Pos; Stefan P G Franken; Alexis N T J Kotte; Carla H van Gils; Marco van Vulpen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Prostate rotation detected from implanted markers can affect dose coverage and cannot be simply dismissed.

Authors:  Qingyang Shang; Lawrence J Sheplan Olsen; Kevin Stephans; Rahul Tendulkar; Ping Xia
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Margin evaluation of translational and rotational set-up errors in intensity modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiang Zhang; Guo-Ping Shan; Ji-Ping Liu; Bin-Bing Wang
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-02-24

9.  Simulating intrafraction prostate motion with a random walk model.

Authors:  Tobias Pommer; Jung Hun Oh; Per Munck Af Rosenschöld; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-03-28

10.  Focal dose escalation for prostate cancer using 68Ga-HBED-CC PSMA PET/CT and MRI: a planning study based on histology reference.

Authors:  Constantinos Zamboglou; Benedikt Thomann; Khodor Koubar; Peter Bronsert; Tobias Krauss; Hans C Rischke; Ilias Sachpazidis; Vanessa Drendel; Nasr Salman; Kathrin Reichel; Cordula A Jilg; Martin Werner; Philipp T Meyer; Michael Bock; Dimos Baltas; Anca L Grosu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.